How about Jane lai's book? Please make an objective evaluation. Thank you.

First of all, I'm really a fan of Fiberhome. I've been studying for 8 years. However, I want to evaluate this book fairly.

Advantages of this book:

1. As can be seen from the article, the author must have devoted a lot of thoughts to this book. The article quotes many hundreds of classics, which can never be written without profound accumulation and understanding. Compared with some works, it is very enjoyable.

The greatest advantage of this novel is that it dares to break through. Why do you dare to break through? He dares to write some boring truths that readers don't like in the book, which makes readers who don't like it feel boring and makes readers who like to read feel and think. Is it boring? Yes, but it's just right and indispensable!

3. If we say that this book is desirable, we can't help but mention its plot mode and foreshadowing. Some unimportant passers-by in the early stage of the article may become important clues in the next few hundred chapters, which makes people have to sigh the author's thinking. The pattern of this work can also be seen clearly. The four worlds are divided into groups because of people's hearts, and the interlacing of them has to be sighed. I saw a netizen upstairs saying that this is a small white text, which is really true. The pattern is large, the foreshadowing is far away, and the plot is continuous and staggered, which is amazing. Is the content bloated and useless? Although boring, but indispensable, just right!

This article attaches great importance to the psychological description of characters. For example, in the passage of Jane Lake, the protagonist is faced with the choice of "friendship" and "truth in the heart". His collapse, behavior and thoughts are orderly, in short, logical, and one choice to another is like the psychological process of our normal people. Obviously, the author must have joined his thinking about life when he first entered the society, which is vivid and lifelike.

In this work, the personality of the characters is vividly reflected. A person's personality is fully reflected in the subtle movements, psychology, language and other writing styles of the author. For example, the attitude and language changes of mountain gods, river mothers and "masters" in rivers and lakes are extremely philistine. Isn't this just like what people around us encounter in life and workplace? The immortals on the mountain are like caged birds, polluted by the world. Why not be vivid and real? Why can't you see a person's character through such little moves as "getting up and giving up your seat" and "sitting back and forth"?

Disadvantages:

1. The description of emotional lines in this novel is really flattering. In the early stage, except for the touching scene where the hero went to the Great Wall, there were few descriptions of the hero and heroine in other plots, which was really inconsistent with the deep feelings in the following articles, and the emotional promotion was too blunt.

The biggest shortcoming of this book is its advantages, that is, its shortcomings, boring truth, chewy words and long foreshadowing, which can all be reasons to hate him. This novel is better than the explanation of truth, which is contended by a hundred schools of thought, because it is tasteless, beautiful in language, flashy, huge in structure and complex in content.

There are too many diaries in some places in the novel, such as the Haoran World War. Because the territory is too vast, the author wants to write too many things, so he can't write the real battlefield, and he can only write some trivial events, which is somewhat disappointing. But it is not clear whether this is the author's foreshadowing. Just like the wild attack in the article, many people spray wild to save money and material resources, but lengthen the front. The author's thinking is obviously flawed and unreasonable. What's more, he said that the plot of the novel collapsed. But in the end, the author laid the groundwork, only to know that Zhou Mi wanted to complete the ultimate plan of "going to heaven", to turn the war around with one person, to change the whole chess game with one chess piece, and to turn the worst strategy into the best one. This also makes many people face up to it, so it is difficult to determine whether the author is intentional.

In a word, Jane's book is still very good, with great potential, and it is expected to become a masterpiece or even a masterpiece. After all, there are still many articles that pave the way: how to compete with the three realms after careful promotion, how Chen Ping-An finally pursues to explain the truth that anyone in the world can use in a simple sentence, and how to hand over a sword that is restored with the swordsman's mentality and identity. So some of what Heifen said is reasonable, but exaggerated. This book is still very good.