There has never been a record in history that Tang Bin was "the first upright official in the Qing Dynasty". Why do some people insist on such propaganda?

Some scholars have pointed out that Tang Bin's Draft of Ming History is suspected of plagiarizing the draft of Ming History. "For example, Fang's manuscript is the same as that written by Tang Bin. Because Tang Bin is the president, he may delete the manuscript from the manuscript of Qian 'an history (taking advantage of his position). ..... and its writing, compared with Tang Qian's Ann draft, are relatively simple, you know the soup draft is actually an increase and change. All this is based on Shi Li (Jinhua)' s Collection of Textual Research. (Zhongzhou Ancient Books Publishing House, version 1982, Liu Jie, editor-in-chief of "History of China")

In the tenth year of Yongzheng (1732), Tang Bin entered the "Hall of Virtue". At this time, it was in the cruel period of the "literary inquisition" in the Qing Dynasty. In order to strengthen the rule in the ideological field, the rulers of the Qing Dynasty tried to put out the rebellious consciousness of the Han people by violent means. Lv Liuliang was opened to slaughter, and a large number of Han people were arrested and persecuted. Lv Liuliang was a famous Neo-Confucianism contemporary with Tang Bin in the late Ming and early Qing Dynasties. But unlike Tang Bin, after the death of the Ming Dynasty, he vowed not to be an official in the Qing Dynasty, to live in seclusion in the mountains, to become a monk, and to write. There was a poem "Although the breeze is hard to blow me, the bright moon does not shine on people", which aroused the hatred of the rulers of the Qing Dynasty. Tang Bin was the first senior intellectual of Han nationality to join the Manchu government. During his tenure, he vigorously promoted the cultural policy advocated by Manchu. In Jiangsu, he banned anti-Qing publications in the name of "sweeping pornography", and the draft of the Ming Dynasty was also in line with the taste of Manchu rulers. In order to consolidate the achievements of "literary inquisition", 45 years after his death, Tang Bin was set an example by Yong Zhengdi and incorporated into the Immortal Temple.

Only a few Han Chinese, such as Tang Bin and Yang, who were absolutely obedient and dedicated to singing hymns, could do it in the Qing Dynasty. During the Ming and Qing Dynasties, Chinese classics were banned by Manchu, leaving a tragic situation, while Manchu classics were mostly deleted in the name of reconstruction. Therefore, in the face of historical events, ancient book retrieval is often either missing, one-sided or even distorted. Therefore, Lu Xun said bluntly that if future generations in the world read books such as Sikuquanshu, "they will never feel that China once had a man of great backbone".

The current academic circles are impetuous and flashy, catering to utilitarianism. In the history of China, there are jokes, rudeness, crooked ways and so on. Not only does it lack academic responsibility, but it also lacks due social and moral responsibility. For example, when the country was rebuilding history of qing dynasty, some people proposed to affirm Wu Sangui, which seemed to be an academic "innovation", but actually deconstructed the moral system of the Chinese nation. The result of the development of this theory is to rehabilitate Wang Jingwei and others for "saving the country by curve". Throughout the world, not only Japan and Russia, but also the United States, which is highly democratic and attaches importance to individual life, is absolutely tough and strict in its position concerning the fundamental interests of the nation and the country. This is the moral bottom line of a good person. The statement of "affirming the Qing Dynasty in Wu Sangui" is not only far from the current moral standard of the country, but also will ruin the patriotic spirit formed by the Chinese nation for thousands of years. Judging from the bitter experience, it is conceivable that every dynasty of the Chinese nation has been leaped by fresh life and iron bones, and it is by no means a so-called "prosperous time" that you can see with your eyes open.

It is worth mentioning that Tang Bin and Yu Chenglong, as representatives of senior intellectuals of the Han nationality at that time, were first recruited into the Manchu Dynasty, which changed the precedent that most of them stayed in Confucianism at that time. In addition, the draft of Ming History, which Tang Bin participated in, is more in line with the policy requirements of suppressing Han culture in the "literary inquisition" in the late Qing Dynasty. Therefore, Tang Bin was deliberately set up by the rulers after the Qing Dynasty as a model for later Confucian scholars, which made the Han people follow suit in order to achieve the political goal of fundamentally gathering the Han people. He was also contemporary with Gu (16 13- 1682) and Huang Zongxi (1610/695) and (1638). Moreover, the Tang family was also an old aristocratic family favored by the Ming Dynasty, and their basic education was also carried out in the Ming Dynasty. From the point of view of this nation, there is a speculative sense of existence in Tang Bin's thought, and we can't blindly worship and imitate it.

Modern Zou Rong said in the article "Revolutionary Army": "Although people have the virtues of being quiet slaves such as Yang, Tang Bin and so on. I often condemn and insult them, but I can't hear them. " It can be seen that although you are a "quiet slave", you still have to be discriminated against by the rulers of the Qing Dynasty. Judging from the nearly 300-year rule history of the Qing Dynasty, the relationship between courtiers and rulers serving the rulers of the Qing Dynasty cannot be equated with the relationship between "monarch" and "minister" in the traditional sense of China, and Nuo Nuo is the only one, more like the relationship between "slave" and "master". Even the proportion and weight distribution of Manchu and Han officials are strikingly different from those of various dynasties in history. This is a deep-seated problem worthy of reflection for those who need to rebuild national self-confidence to realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation today.

Tang Bin's epitaph is now in Shangqiu Museum, written by fellow villager Tian Lanfang and engraved by Wu. Both of them are civilian Confucian scholars, and their ranks and ranks seem to be relatively low, which seems to be inconsistent with the style and standards of emperor sacrifice and burial. It can be seen that Tang Bin's status and influence before and after his death were not respected as deliberately publicized later.