Hexi Letters: Which is the higher status, the Japanese "emperor" or China "emperor"?

First of all, we must make it clear that the "emperor system" that the Japanese claimed to have lasted for more than 2,000 years does not really exist, and there is not even the most basic archaeological evidence. Aside from the confusing myth that "God shines on heaven and makes man", as early as the middle of the seventh century, Japan didn't even have words. Naturally, there is no such thing as an "emperor", and of course there is no such thing as an "emperor". According to the records in China's history books, until the 4th century AD, Japan was still a slave tribe, and the influence and influence of the chieftain was not as good as that of the emperor in the Central Plains, or even as good as that of the vassal, but it was almost the same as that of the chieftain "Wang Ye" among the ethnic minorities in Yunnan, Guizhou and other places in western Sichuan before liberation. What surprised historians even more was that after the word "Emperor" appeared, Japanese rulers actually sealed their ancestors for dozens of generations (whether they were as suspicious as Wei Xiaobao's father or not). This backward historical fabrication of paranoia is really chilling. Its absurdity is as ridiculous as today's insistence on changing all the honorifics of Xia, Shang and Zhou emperors to "emperors" for the sake of perception. If Jie is renamed Xia Youdi, Shang and Zhou Wendi, even we will be bored. Secondly, "Emperor" is the title of the ancient king of China. Why did the Japanese steal it? Most likely, this was done by an envoy of the Tang Dynasty in Tang Gaozong's time. At that time, Tang Gaozong claimed to be the "emperor" and Wu Zetian claimed to be the "queen of heaven". Japanese envoys to the Tang Dynasty lived in China for different lengths of time, but even people who know Chinese may not understand that, under normal circumstances, people in China do not directly call the son of heaven "emperor" when writing or speaking, just as westerners do not call their father "father". Therefore, the envoys of the Tang Dynasty were very confused. They might mistakenly take the "Emperor" of Tang Gaozong as the official name of the supreme ruler and bring it back to their chiefs intact. So, who has a higher position, the emperor or the emperor? The latter, of course! We have clear historical data to prove this. After the unification of the six countries, Ying Zheng was not satisfied with being just a king, and asked his liegeman to redraw his title. To this end, there is a saying: "I (Li Si) and others are willing to discuss with the doctor:' There were emperors in ancient times, and the emperors Huang, Tai Huang and Tai Huang were the most expensive.' ""Wang (Ying Zheng) said: Go to Thailand to write the emperor, take the title of ancient emperor and call him the emperor. " From this, we can draw a conclusion: the emperor