The same China people, the same students, and the same ten years of hard study. Why does it take 600 to 650 points for foreign students to enter Tsinghua Peking University, while Beijing studies?

What's the point of being so cynical? I'm from Tsinghua, and I feel normal.

First of all, it must be clear that 500 points is not enough for Beijing students. I entered Tsinghua from Hubei in 679, and my score in Hubei was 663. The minimum number of Beijingers in our class is 650. When you say Beijing Student 500, you mean art students. . Art students have low requirements for cultural courses. Tsinghua Academy of Fine Arts has 500 cultural courses in other places.

Secondly, even if students in Beijing "can get in as long as 500", what does it matter? Candidates in Hainan still get 800 points. . Tsinghua Peking University is the first person to enroll students in all regions. Even Beijingers are top-notch among the admitted Beijingers. Beijingers are still trying to get into Tsinghua Peking University. Do you think others are that easy to talk to? This has nothing to do with admission scores.

In addition, every region has its own local protection policies, such as Jiansheng, to prevent local students from failing to attend good schools. I don't know whether Beijing has a policy or not, but I know Hubei does. Wuhan people will drop 20 points if they study Chinese studies at Wuhan University (if you don't even know the difference between the investment line and the admission line, and spray Wuhan people cheaply, then I am completely speechless with you). Imagine what other schools would do if everyone went to Tsinghua Peking University and lost their academic qualifications.

To put it bluntly, you are jealous that Beijingers enter Tsinghua Peking University more than other places. However, the enrollment of Tsinghua Peking University still depends on its strength. There are many Beijingers coming in, but they are all Beijing's fine products. When you get to the university, you will never say that Beijingers are "weaker" than us. At present, the general method of university enrollment is to decide whether to increase the number of places according to the level of students in the region in previous years. If you have this ability, the students there are among the top in the whole school, so I think it is not impossible for you to recruit more people there than in Beijing. It's hard after all.

Besides, if there is no so-called "welfare and preferential treatment" in Beijing, why do so many people work so hard to get a Beijing hukou? . Social injustice is the driving force of social development. If everyone is really the same in material interests, where is the motivation for struggle?

The current enrollment system is the result of comprehensive scientific analysis in many aspects. It can't be said to be the best, but there is nothing better than it at present. He at least achieved the fairness of most people. Don't spray unless you actually know it.