Junior high school students' comprehensive practical activity plan

Junior high school students' comprehensive practical activity plan

Situation 1: People can't help eating and going to the toilet. The secondary school affiliated to Hebei Xinle Teachers' Training School should control students' metabolism and set a rule of "no toilet at night": whoever dares to go to the toilet without authorization will be punished! When the regulations came out, the students were in an uproar, but they dared not speak out. At night, the food bag is used to drain the urgency of urination, and there are often leaks, which makes the bed full of urine stains; If you have to change a washbasin, you can use it to wash and urinate, which is another dirty thing. Bound by regulations, students complain, parents are angry. (Zhao Yan Metropolis Daily165438+1October 28th). What are the advantages of such inhuman means in academic research? The school explained: "Just for the convenience of management." I don't know why children have to worry about saving trouble. Furthermore, how can going to the toilet affect management? Parents don't understand this inhuman rule.

Once upon a time, there were various forms of school rules and disciplines on campus, including those that restricted hairstyles and makeup, those that restricted clothing and those that restricted personal behavior. For example, middle school students are not allowed to talk to strangers, primary school students are not allowed to walk around after class, and several sets of school uniforms are uniformly customized. Schools are all for the good of students, and many school rules are derived from "once bitten, twice shy". Moreover, a considerable number of restrictions on private rights have been welcomed by the vast majority of parents, and they have been given a green light all the way. Few students and parents object to this case of "no urine order", but even a militarized life may not be able to do this.

However, when private rights encounter school rules and have a fierce collision, we have to reflect on whether strict school rules are a preventive measure or a kind of "lazy teaching". Why are the school rules so ruthless when the humanization of law is advocated and law enforcement needs warmth? And this rule is obviously unfair. The "no urine order" only prohibits students, teachers and educatees from living under the same roof, but they do not enjoy the same basic rights and interests. Why should educators set an example? Even if they are criminals deprived of personal freedom, they should have the right to eat and drink Lazar.

In today's people-oriented society, it is only a manifestation of the incompetence of educators to "manage conveniently" by limiting the private rights of the managed, and the problem suppressed by the "no urine order" has attracted enough attention from local education and even many competent departments. Because blindly sacrificing the rights and interests of the managed to strengthen and facilitate the management thinking, it is time to really change! Otherwise, it is inevitable that there will be more absurd instructions such as "no urine orders".

Situation 2: An unexpected thing happened in Suixi County Central Primary School a few days ago: Tan Xinfang, the vice principal, was completed, all the teachers in the school went for a drink, and more than 2,500 students were suspended for one day. Yes, strictly speaking, it's a one-day class, and the class on Monday was transferred to last Saturday. However, the Suixi County Education Bureau stipulates that all primary and secondary schools in the county must report to the county education bureau for approval if they change classes or suspend classes for more than half a day. Class transfer in primary schools in Cheng Yue has not been reported.

There is no doubt that the behavior featuring Vice President Tan is extremely wrong and illegal. I noticed that when many teachers talked about this matter, they all emphasized that "Vice President Tan is honest and diligent, and usually handles the relationship between colleagues and teachers very well"; Vice President Tan himself said that in the process of building a private house, "he didn't use a penny of public funds from the school from beginning to end, and during the two years of building construction, he didn't get any financial reimbursement for every penny of travel expenses from the city to Zhanjiang." Of course, readers and writers can understand the subtext, which shows that Vice Chairman Tan has a good personality and official quality. It's not right, but it's understandable. This reminds me of the strange thing not long ago that "a good policeman killed a good policeman". After the incident was exposed, both units ignored the willy-nilly, and first declared that their policemen were good policemen. In my opinion, whether intentionally or unintentionally, similar emphasis is suspected of blurring the nature of the event. Whether Vice President Tan has won the heartfelt love of his colleagues and whether there are financial problems is another matter. The incident happened, which was caused by bad influence. It is not helpful to understand the nature of the event without dissecting it from the depths of thought.

It is a local custom to hold a banquet in a new house, which is understandable in itself; But what happened to leading cadres may be related to the rights and wrongs. Two days ago, Lanzhou stipulated that leading cadres must report to the party organization, the superior discipline inspection commission and the organization and personnel department of their unit to handle matters such as weddings, funerals and weddings, and explain the handling situation, such as what car they used and what gifts they received. They regard this as "fighting corruption and promoting honesty from scratch". The implication is that these small things are often the breakthrough of corruption. From various examples, it is not difficult to find that for some people, attending these occasions is due to the arrogance of powerful people and they have to do it; For others, they may find an excellent opportunity to flatter. Then, all the excitement on the surface and the filth in the bones are hard to hide. I once disdained all kinds of instructions for cadres to "forbid" to be too specific. Now it seems that it is really not possible to be specific. After the incident of "cadres dressed as bandits" was exposed, some cadres concluded: "Because of our negligence, the masses took advantage." This absurd logic should be put right, that is, once the "no" rule is not refined, those cadres with bad conduct will take advantage of their positions to discipline and state laws. What I don't quite understand is, why did Vice President Tan have to choose Monday as the day to enter the class, but he didn't make adequate preparations last weekend? You can wait for the next one, but only for five days. Even if that day belongs to "auspicious day", it is appropriate to join the job, and students should study every day. In the final analysis, it is they, Vice President Tan and other primary school leaders who do not pay attention to the rights and interests of more than 2,000 students.

Because of "seriously disturbing the normal teaching order of the school and having a bad influence", Vice President Tan is now suspended for inspection, and there is nothing to regret. I am more worried about whether this incident can really teach him a lesson and serve as a warning to others.