A woman died in a car accident in Yueyang. The perpetrator is the police chief. What was the cause of the accident?

65438+10.5, Yueyang, Hunan. Some citizens questioned that the traffic police found that the perpetrators were leaders when dealing with traffic accidents, and released people without alcohol testing, which caused concern. In this regard, the Pingjiang County Public Security Bureau stated that the perpetrator did serve as the director of the police station, but he was an ordinary policeman at the time of the incident.

At the same time, the traffic police conducted an alcohol test on the spot, initially excluding drunk driving; The traffic accident was caused by a pedestrian being hung down and being crushed to death by the vehicle behind him. At present, the perpetrators have been detained and the case has been handed over to the Municipal Bureau.

The impact of the incident was that the woman was run over and killed. The perpetrator was the director of the police station. Dealing with traffic accidents still needs to be realistic. Although the death of a person is very painful for everyone, because the driver of the accident vehicle is a policeman, the punishment cannot be aggravated, nor can this mood be aggravated by rumors.

The previous news was that the traffic police saw that the police did not give him an alcohol test after driving and let him go without permission. This is easy to cause public outrage and is suspected of shielding the law. However, according to the local police, the police accepted the alcohol test on the spot and ruled out drunk driving. It seems that the information in the previous legend is untrue, misleading the relevant public opinion.

It is still necessary to clarify the responsibility for the handling of traffic accidents that have caused heated discussion. The car driven by the police knocked down the woman who was crossing the road, and she was killed by the car behind her. First of all, it depends on whether the woman has crossed the road in violation of traffic regulations. If not, the vehicle is responsible. The car in front knocked down people, and the car behind ran over people.

The two cars should distinguish the responsibilities, and see whose primary responsibility and secondary responsibility, or whether to share the responsibilities equally. If the preceding vehicle bears the main responsibility or full responsibility, according to the traffic management law, one person's death may be suspected of committing a crime; If it is not all or the main responsibility, the driver in front of the car does not need to bear criminal responsibility.

Conclusion It should be very important to elevate the handling of this matter to the direct responsibility of the Municipal Bureau. It's best to explain the whole thing to the public in detail so that everyone can understand it better. There can be no ambiguity, otherwise it will trigger a new round of public opinion speculation.

In the process of driving, if a pedestrian crosses the road and does not slow down, he is mainly responsible for the accident; If the rear vehicle fails to drive in a safe and civilized manner according to the operation specifications, and pedestrians fail to pass after crossing the road to confirm safety, * * * shall bear the secondary responsibility for the accident. Law enforcement must be strict, and offenders will be prosecuted. For the illegal and criminal acts of civil servants, a bowl of water should be leveled and dealt with according to law with stricter requirements.