Is it necessary to send children to study in the city for the sake of children?

From the perspective of reading alone, I don't think it is necessary.

Especially in today's society. The network is so developed that it connects the whole world. The amount of information is unprecedented. You can not only read and buy books through the internet, but also listen to books, watch videos and listen to others to help you interpret a book. Very convenient. As long as you live with internet.

As for saying that cities can broaden people's horizons, I don't think so. Look at Zhuge Liang's thatched cottage. It's three points in the world. People's horizons have nothing to do with the region, but with what books they read. In addition, it is related to the eyes of parents. Parents' broad vision can guide their children to work hard in the right direction. Children in rural areas are equally successful. There are countless examples of this. Conversely, children in some big cities can't go to college.

If you want your children to receive a better education, then big cities may have an advantage. The main reason is the advantage of teachers, which is undeniable. The level of teachers in big cities is much better. In addition, the teaching conditions in big cities are also better. At least laboratory playgrounds and classrooms are better than remote areas.

My aunt went to junior high school in the provincial capital for her children. She spent hundreds of thousands of dollars back and forth and traveled for two whole months. In the craziest time, whenever I hear the information about the enrollment of this school, I will get to the bottom of it and pursue it. Actually, my cousin's grades are quite good. Although the primary school is in the countryside, she has a solid knowledge because of her diligence.

I was curious at first, why my aunt worked so hard to send my cousin to school in the provincial capital. In a conversation, she said that because of her different knowledge. In the provincial capital, her classmates and teachers are knowledgeable people, and her environment is full of opportunities and new things. Going to school in the countryside does not worry about grades. What worries me most is her narrow knowledge. I am afraid that she will be deceived by the ease in front of her, and that she will stagnate.

A good environment is all-round for a person's cultivation. For a student, learning is the main thing, but it is never the whole thing.

This makes me feel necessary. If conditions permit, it is very important to send children to schools in cities with high teaching quality and high cultural level so that children can get a good education.

At present, there are many private schools, and the quality and level of some teachers are not high. If teachers are not responsible, they will ruin their children.

So the problem of going to school can never be solved or done. Children are the pillars of the country, and it is difficult to correct them because they have not laid a good foundation, so we must start with dolls. Parents should also pay attention to education. Finally, I wish everyone a happy family, peace and health, happiness and happiness, and a good life every day!

Two words: must! Four words: very necessary!

Generally speaking, the size of a city is directly proportional to the concentration of high-quality educational resources. That is, the bigger the city, the more concentrated the quality education resources are. At the same time, the investment in education is the same! The first-class schools in villages and towns can hardly compete with the second-and third-rate schools in big cities at the same level, let alone the first-class schools in big cities. Schools in towns and villages are far behind those in big cities in campus construction, educational equipment and equipment investment, and teachers are even more prominent! When middle schools in big cities have popularized English classes in English, English teachers in township schools may not even have standard pronunciation, but also have the accent of their hometown dialect. This is a living reality.

Secondly, when you study in the city, you are much more exposed to things than when you study in villages and towns! The more latest information you get. Students who study together are more knowledgeable than they will be in the future. For the students in these cities, take Wan Li Road and cut off thousands of books. Their travel experience alone may be much more than that of adults in villages and towns. While adults in small towns are still complacent about having been to the provincial capital, many urban students may have taken traveling abroad as a routine. Therefore, the environment determines a child's vision and experience.

Therefore, as long as conditions permit, we must send our children to study in the city! The bigger the city, the better. The more economically developed coastal areas are, the better for children.

First of all, if your family conditions permit, I support learning from quality educational resources. Because I always believe in first-class schools and first-class standards. Just like social and economic development, it is always the concept of taking the city as the center and the countryside surrounding the city. But if you are in a remote area, when can you surround these places? Education level is always linked to economic level. Children in rural areas finish their homework after school, herding sheep to do farm work, and children in cities finish their homework skills. These special skills are the key means to promote the development of brain thinking, which rural children cannot enjoy.

Secondly, children are sent to the city and don't let go. As parents, they care more than before, because some children are like caged birds. Once it breaks up, it will let itself go. Without parents, there are many temptations in the city, especially for teenagers. It's easy to go astray, so we should pay more attention to it psychologically.

I can only give you some advice on my understanding!

If you want to consider your child's academic performance, there are two situations:

1, your child's academic performance is not good, and his consciousness is not strong.

In this case, we should consider sending our children to the city to study as much as possible. Students in schools in rural areas are clearly divided into two extremes. About 30% students have good academic performance, about 60% students have poor academic performance, and about 10% students have average academic performance. What does this mean? This shows that if your child's academic performance is poor, then it is likely to enter the end of poor performance. As the saying goes, "Birds of a feather flock together, people are divided into groups", and entering the "poor" end is simply a broken jar. Especially in rural junior high schools, there are fast classes and slow classes, and entering the slow class = being abandoned.

The proportion of students in schools in the city is very large, and the proportion of students with poor grades is very small. In other words, even if your child's grades are not good, it is easy to slowly enter the ranks of middle school students in an environment with a very large proportion of middle school students. At the very least, your child's chances of breaking the jar are very small.

Your child has good academic performance and strong self-consciousness.

In this case, you don't have to go to school in the city, even in rural schools, you are more likely to be concerned by teachers. "Caring" will cause your child to be closely watched by the teacher, and it is really hard to get worse.

Some people may say, "Are rural teachers so biased?" . Don't! That's not true. Teachers always want to teach every student well, but because most of these students with poor grades are left-behind children, even if your teacher works hard at school and has a good educational effect, once these students return to China, the teacher's educational effect will go up in smoke. Let me put it more thoroughly: teachers want to teach these poor students in rural areas well, but there is nothing they can do. Education needs the joint efforts of families and schools, and one person's strength is useless.

Of course. I consider communication, knowledge and other factors, so it is certainly better to study in the city, but is this "better" a reason to send children to study in the city? I don't think so. I think children have strong comprehensive ability? In fact, it is more related to "nature", which is difficult to change.

Look forward to your recognition and attention!

Urban resources and horizons are much better than those in rural areas, but it also depends on whether children's own personality is suitable for going out alone. If they don't adapt at school, they will be in trouble if they are isolated. Preferably at home. It depends on his current state, whether he is happy and satisfied in his hometown or "not enough to eat". It is the most important thing to think that the environment in his hometown can't satisfy him.

Of course, high-quality educational resources are in cities, especially big cities. However, the educational resources in cities are not balanced, and not every school has high-quality educational resources and excellent teachers. In fact, teachers and educational resources are just things that guide students, and they are the same everywhere.

Moreover, with the rapid development of online education, many educational resources can be obtained from the Internet. If a child is diligent and studious, he can become a success no matter where he goes to school, mainly depending on his determination and will.

In my opinion, to educate children well, parents should be educated first. Parents are the children's first teachers, which have a great and far-reaching influence on the children's life. Therefore, parents must first find ways to educate themselves.

I don't advocate asking early children to learn too much. They should have fun when they are young, so that they can win the Nobel Prize when they grow up.

@ jingjing jingjing jingjing jingjing jingjing jingjing

This is necessary. Teachers' endowments, teaching methods, educational resources, students' level and students' horizons are all different, including teachers' horizons. Studying in the city, I think you have to pay a lot more. I think it is necessary to study in the city if conditions permit.

At the stage of studying, choosing a city is not important, but choosing a school is more important. Choose the school and then choose the head teacher, the head teacher is the soul of a class, whether its teaching methods are accepted by children and so on. More importantly, no matter how good a teacher is, your children reject it and refuse it.

Of course, unfortunately, we don't have that many choices. Everyone knows to choose the best and most suitable one, but often we can't get what we want.

When we have no choice, we prefer to change ourselves. Relatively speaking, changing yourself is the cheapest and easiest.