How about Citroen C5? Used. Come on!

Last year's 1.6L, 65438+ 10 was changed to C5 2.3L in October, and it has been running for 5500Km. My feelings are as follows, I hope I can help you:

Fuel consumption 1: When you step on the accelerator, the instantaneous fuel consumption shows a feeling of pain. If you step on the accelerator too hard, the maximum fuel consumption can reach 16~ 17 Stable at 40 yards, the instantaneous fuel consumption is more than 8, stable at 60 yards, but the instantaneous fuel consumption display is only more than 7, stable at 90 yards, and the instantaneous fuel consumption display is still only more than 7, slightly higher than 60 yards. It seems that I would rather take a detour than take the elevated road.

2. Safety maintenance: 1.6 tons, big guy. A few years ago, a Mondeo cut in line and slapped my left front ass. I felt it in the car, but I didn't even shake it But it took me 750 meters to touch up the paint. Once I accidentally scratched the tire on the side of the road and broke the skin. According to the Internet, if it's over 1000 meters, don't maintain it.

Appearance: Personally, I think the side is not as beautiful as Audi's L, but it is more beautiful than other cars. At first glance, it looks a little lame, but fortunately, there are daytime running lights, which can increase the lighting points.

Interior: Absolutely textured, more exquisite than American and German, and more elegant than Japanese.

5 space and comfort: the interior space is average, the height is a little short, the seat is too thick and cold, but it takes up the rear space, which is a little sorry for the wheelbase of 28 15.

6 Quality: There is no problem at present. After all, the quality of 200,000 things will not be too bad.

7 power and handling: overtaking in corners is a bit reluctant, and the reaction of slamming on the accelerator is lagging behind, which is definitely not as good as that with T, and it is similar to the Accord.