What is the level of Professor Tsinghua University?

Although Tsinghua is a vice-ministerial university, the president of Tsinghua is a vice-ministerial university, and only the president and party secretary are vice-ministerial universities. The administrative level of vice presidents is the same as that of other universities, and the administrative level of other leading cadres is the same. So Tsinghua's professor is the CPC.

Professors are the highest level of university teachers' titles, which is equivalent to the super-high level of middle school teachers. Professors need to undertake teaching tasks. If you are a scientific researcher, you don't need to undertake teaching tasks.

The titles of university teachers are divided into four levels: teaching assistant, lecturer, associate professor and professor, among which the lecturer is an intermediate title, and there is little difference between teaching assistant and lecturer, mainly depending on whether there are teaching tasks.

Extended data:

Without publishing a paper, Jiang, a teacher of Nanjing Forestry University who has been teaching for 33 years, was named a professor. According to media reports, a few days ago, many colleges and universities in Jiangsu introduced a new policy of professional title evaluation: when evaluating and hiring teachers with "teaching expertise", the number of published papers will no longer be used as the assessment content, but the teaching performance will replace the scientific research performance, focusing on their teaching level and personnel training results.

In fact, there is not much new idea to classify and evaluate teachers in colleges and universities in Jiangsu instead of evaluating teachers with "teaching expertise" by the number of published papers. This is the direction of professional title evaluation and talent evaluation reform.

The "Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Professional Title System" issued by the Central Office and the State Council put forward to the National Education Conference, resolutely overcoming the stubborn diseases of only grades, only further studies, only diplomas, only papers and only hats.

Subsequently, the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Education and other five departments issued the "Notice on Carrying out the Special Action of Cleaning up" Only Papers, Only Professional Titles, Only Education, Only Awards "and so on. All of these need to break the "only paper theory". It is commendable that many colleges and universities in Jiangsu have implemented this requirement.

Universities that don't pay attention to undergraduate education are unqualified universities, presidents who don't pay attention to undergraduate education are unqualified presidents, and professors who don't participate in undergraduate education are unqualified professors.

It is a teacher's duty for university teachers to engage in teaching. However, due to the heroic evaluation of professional titles in colleges and universities, university teaching is marginalized, "water classes" abound, and students lack a sense of classroom acquisition, which restricts the improvement of undergraduate talent training quality. On the other hand, too much emphasis on the number of papers and not on the quality has also led to a large number of low-level scientific research results being mass-produced.

Professional title evaluation is a baton to guide college teachers to handle the relationship between teaching and scientific research. Teaching promotes scientific research, scientific research promotes teaching, and scientific research and teaching complement each other.

But different teachers have different emphases on what they love and are good at. For most people, it is not easy to do both scientific research and teaching well. Therefore, classified evaluation, using different rulers to evaluate different types of teachers, and guiding teachers' classified development can make the best use of their talents.

Last year, since the national conference on undergraduate education in colleges and universities in the new era was held, it has become the core content of higher education reform to adhere to the principle of "taking this as the foundation", promote the "four returns" and accelerate the construction of high-level undergraduate education. Eliminating "water course" and creating "golden course" are the urgent tasks to improve the quality of undergraduate education.

Creating the "golden curriculum" requires teachers to pay a lot of effort and investment, which involves the evaluation of professional titles related to teachers' vital interests. If we don't change the "thesis-only" evaluation method of professional titles, it is still "teaching well is better than writing well", then it will be difficult to really motivate college teachers to pay attention to teaching and devote themselves to teaching.

Breaking away from "only discussing papers" can not only eliminate teachers' worries about teaching, but also guide and encourage more teachers who love and are good at teaching to return to their teaching posts, constantly improve their teaching ability and professional level, and create more "golden courses" to lay a solid foundation for running high-quality undergraduate education.

Of course, we should also see that the evaluation of professional titles pays more attention to scientific research than teaching, which is also related to the fact that scientific research results are easy to quantify, while teaching quality is difficult to quantify and subjective.

Therefore, what is the meaning of "teaching well" by replacing scientific research results with teaching results? The same standards must be objective, detailed, fair and just. At the same time, classified evaluation is not to let teachers give up scientific research. In practice, we should also deal with the relationship between scientific research and teaching to avoid going from one extreme to the other.

Baidu encyclopedia-professor

Baidu encyclopedia-administrative level of colleges and universities

People's Daily Online-Guangming Daily: "Teaching well" can evaluate the knowledge that professors should become * * *.