Combined with the movie The Day After Tomorrow, this paper discusses what global warming is and its causes.

According to my research, if what I said is right, then what is upstairs must be nonsense.

The day after tomorrow is an excellent film, but his environmental theory should be wrong.

In my opinion, global warming is a natural phenomenon and very normal. Besides, if the weather gets warmer, it will get cold. This is a cyclical process, but we are in a period of warming.

But if you are not tired of watching it, I can give you a thorough analysis of the climate problem.

First of all, let me make it clear that there is no problem with the climate. Basically this is the real situation! !

According to historical data, from the end of World War II to 1975, the global climate gradually became cold, and then from 1975 to 2000, the climate became warmer. From 2000 to 20 10, the climate was not driven by continuous warming. Some experts believe that the climate has begun to get colder.

Let's analyze the above data. You can find that after the end of World War II, the industry developed at a high speed, emitting a lot of carbon dioxide, but the climate did not get warmer. On the contrary, from 75 years later to 2000, the temperature rose, and then until now, the temperature has not changed. It can be seen that the climate has a curve fluctuation process, which is about 25 years. This has nothing to do with carbon dioxide. Because if the increase of carbon dioxide will lead to an increase in temperature, there will be no process of temperature cooling after the end of World War II.

Then let's talk about carbon dioxide. Theoretically, carbon dioxide is indeed a kind of "insulation gas", but what I want to say is that the carbon dioxide emitted by human beings is actually very insignificant. The content of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 0.054%. The annual carbon dioxide produced by bacteria and fallen leaves is about 654.38+050 billion tons. Human-related activities, including breathing and automobile exhaust, are produced every year.

Moreover, from the study of the surface of ice samples, there are many ice ages and high temperature periods on the earth, but this is obviously different from the level of carbon dioxide content. Historically, the temperature always reached its peak several centuries after it reached its peak, but after it reached its peak, it gradually became cold.

The researchers concluded that during the high temperature period, due to the gradual increase of temperature, a large amount of carbon dioxide in the ocean was released, resulting in a high carbon dioxide content. When the temperature gradually decreases, the release of carbon dioxide will gradually stop until it is not released, and finally carbon dioxide will be "recycled", so the temperature will be different from the carbon dioxide content.

From this conclusion, we can find that our previous understanding that carbon dioxide causes high temperature has no scientific basis. The final answer is that temperature affects the content of carbon dioxide.

In addition, when it comes to heat preservation gas, the heat preservation effect of carbon dioxide is actually poor. Who is worse than it? Worse than water vapor, much worse ~ ~

Based on the above statement, we can draw the final conclusion that the process of climate warming is actually a normal change of the earth's climate. There was a warmer period on earth than now in history, that is, the Middle Ages, when the world society was quite rich, and most famous churches in Europe were built at that time, while in China, it was experiencing the peak of feudal society-Kaiyuan Shi Sheng! In addition, the industrial revolution was a famous ice age in history. At that time, the Thames was frozen, and vendors often set up shop on the ice in winter. So there is no problem with the climate, and the temperature changes are as normal as all the year round.

Then you may think, why is the slogan of "low carbon" so loud now when there is no problem with the climate?

I tell you, the Copenhagen conference, said to be a conference to save the planet, was actually a political conspiracy by economically developed countries to restrict the development of developing countries, and the environment was just used.

The global climate problem originated in Britain, and the initiator was Margaret Thatcher, the first famous female prime minister in Britain. Because of the acid rain phenomenon in Britain during her campaign, she put forward the campaign slogan of global environmental degradation and protection, which just catered to the psychology of two people. First, after World War II, because of the existence of the atomic bomb, human beings blindly realized that they had great power and thought that they could destroy the earth. The second is the fear of "having great power", which in turn will be destroyed by your own strength. So Thatcher took advantage of this slogan and became the first female prime minister in Britain. This law will be widely used by politicians in various countries in various political and economic fields, especially in the economic field.

The world economy is like a plate of water, and all countries in the world are like a plate of water. If you lay the plate flat, the water content in all parts of the plate is the same. If you hold it unevenly, some parts of the plate will get more water and some parts will get less water. However, the big countries led by the United States hope that the plate can tilt and get more water.

As a result, big countries throw out the just banner of "energy saving, emission reduction, low carbon and environmental protection", shouting this slogan loudly and confidently, taking environmental protection as the commanding height of morality, and making them "take the environment as the emperor and make them disobey me". Anyone who doesn't listen to him can punish you with this, and it can be cruel. Just as Christians punished pagans in the Middle Ages, they can use the stake. You have to understand that reducing carbon dioxide emissions means that for developing countries, output will drop and economic development will slow down. If you slow down, the advantages of developed countries such as the United States will become more obvious. The "water" of the economy will fall on the United States, and the "water" of the United States will naturally increase.

As the biggest victorious country in World War II, the United States successfully carved up the economy after World War II. Its content is that Africa, Asia and South America export raw materials and cheap crude products, and the first and second world countries (North America and Western Europe) led by the United States are responsible for logistics, advertising marketing, design, packaging and retail. The final product is digested by China or re-exported to developing countries. Among them, the profit of rough processing of raw materials export is the lowest, and the profit of logistics, advertising marketing, design, packaging and retail is the most abundant, so the western powers are rich and we are poor. This was carefully planned by the western developed countries headed by the United States.

However, developing countries are not necessarily satisfied with the status quo, and they are all striving for development. But if developing countries develop to the point of destroying the world economic structure planned by western developed countries, the west can no longer tolerate it. They carefully concocted "protecting the world environment", a fat liar who can go down in history! !

In addition, there are more realistic problems. After the American financial crisis, a large number of unemployed people appeared. How to deal with the employment rate is a big problem on Obama's desk. Obama himself is the representative of the blue-collar class, so it is natural to increase workers' jobs. To this end, the United States has made two heavy punches.

The first heavy blow to Japan was the Toyota incident in Japan. By cracking down on Japanese high-end goods such as Toyota, the United States reduced the sales of imported high-end goods, reduced the cost of American goods, and increased the sales and profits of American goods. I don't need to say more about this here. You can find out for yourself.

Second punch, straight to China. Because the increase of industries led by the automobile industry is not enough to meet the employment rate in the United States, nor can it meet Obama's promise to increase 3 million jobs, it is necessary to increase new economic growth points, and the United States has set its goal as a new energy-saving and environmental-friendly industry. However, the United States also wants to ensure that the energy-saving and environmentally-friendly new energy products produced have a market, so the United States has set its goal in China.

First of all, the US feint demands RMB appreciation.

So, what are the benefits of RMB appreciation for the United States? On the surface, this is because the United States is trying to restrict China's exports and make American buyers pay more for cheap goods from China, thus turning their purchasing eyes back to China, so that its own factory will start.

However, this is fatal for China enterprises. As long as the RMB appreciates further by 5-7%, the factories in China will close down, while the United States wants the RMB to appreciate by 30%, which basically means that China enterprises will die.

After that, the United States threatened to label China as a "currency manipulator" and successfully persuaded the European Union to put pressure on China.

However, what the United States has done is not to kill China immediately. His real purpose is to drag China to the negotiating table and increase the bargaining chip.

Sure enough, China really returned to the negotiating table, completely according to the American way of thinking. China and the United States have reached the following understanding.

1, the United States no longer mentions RMB appreciation; 2. The United States is considering recognizing China as a market economy system (clearly, it is considered, and it is not said how long it will be considered); With the contribution of China, the United States "helped" China to build three third-generation nuclear power plants (China already has a safer and more economical fourth-generation nuclear energy product).

Having said that, you should understand that this heavy blow of the United States is actually to find a buyer for American energy-saving and new energy products, and to force others to buy them. The Opium War fought by Britain in order to gain commercial privileges in China was essentially no different.

So my point is that the so-called climate crisis does not exist at all, there is confrontation between countries, and politicians are always dark. This is still a world where the law of the jungle prevails. If there is a climate crisis, it means that the economically developed countries led by the United States create the illusion of climate deterioration to exploit our developing countries. In fact, this society is nominally protecting the environment, but in fact it is destroying the environment. The material used in solar panels is polysilicon, which is very harmful to the environment in the manufacturing process. This is the real source of our environmental crisis. Garbage siege and water pollution are the real culprits that threaten us and nature! Not carbon dioxide.

In order to defend our economy (but not the environment), I suggest that as an ordinary person, what we should do and what we can do to help the country is: under the same conditions, we should try our best to buy domestic goods and spend them in domestic enterprises and businesses, so that people's wealth can stay at home instead of being earned by foreigners. Let our domestic enterprises make more money, so as to give employees more wages. With more wages, they can promote consumption and revitalize China's retail industry, so that China's economy will enter a virtuous circle, so that our economy will be more developed, everyone in China will benefit, and our country will have more confidence in foreign negotiations! ! As for the environment, I only hope that the government can solve the water pollution and garbage siege as soon as possible!

Knowledge and opinions are learned, articles are written by oneself, and right and wrong also have their own answers.