Which is easier to divide the money, a million heroes or a peak?

To give you a straight answer: it's easier to share money at the summit.

The reason for this is the following：

1. Compared with the products of millions of heroes in the live broadcast room, the summit will get more investment because it is an APP. If you don't believe me, look at Wang Sicong. Brother Sicong threw100000 to the top of the mountain on his birthday. The first outlet is 20 18, and the answer is broadcast live. As a stubborn entertainment circle, Master Sicong took the lead. It is conceivable that the summit will not be bad in terms of money.

You can make money if someone invests. If there is no money for a project, then everyone will share the chicken feathers. Catch the summit and take advantage of this wave of heat to save money before making money. With popularity, there will be traffic, and with financial owners, there will be traffic. With financial owners, there will be money, and money will bring more users. Users will get the money and benefits of calling their friends, so there will be more and more users.

Therefore, in its development period, we ordinary users can still easily benefit from the summit.

Second, obviously, as the summit of APP, it has more advantages in user viscosity than as a million heroes in the live broadcast room. Of course, it is conceivable that millions of heroes cannot be trapped in a live broadcast room all the time. It is only a matter of time before they want to grow and make money. Maybe they are doing it now, but they are always one step behind.

Why the user viscosity of Summit as an APP is higher than that of Million Heroes is because of its particularity. Users click on the summit to answer questions and divide the bonus. The goal is clear, that is to say, every user who clicks in is answering questions for the live broadcast.

As a million heroes in a live broadcast room of watermelon video, its users are easily attracted by other live broadcast rooms, and then some users with insufficient viscosity are lost.

The improvement of user viscosity can make the summit develop in a healthy direction, investors will continue to invest, and everyone can share the money.

I am not optimistic about these live answers. Ever since I learned about the summit, I don't think it will last long. I won't talk about eating the keyboard punch. Anyway, I won't really eat it. You don't believe me, and neither do I.

I will talk a little about the reasons:

Mainly because I think there will be many bottlenecks in the development of this thing. For example, Weibo is sharing question banks, various question banks, QQ WeChat group and cheating in the group every day. The magic is one foot high and the Tao is ten feet high. You're really not sure about this identity. The method is always more difficult. If people want to cheat, they must find a way.

If we can't overcome this problem, then the so-called knowledge realization and live answering questions are just a farce for the whole people.

Even if this problem is overcome, this kind of live answering will face problems such as users' boredom, their own innovation can never satisfy users, they can't innovate, and how to change it.

Finally: Anyway, I wish the live broadcast of the answers will get better and better. After all, learning something is much better than eating chicken!