Comparison between Jetta Avant-garde (90,000) and Santana Zhijun (65,438 438+ 10/0,000). Regardless of the price, please compare the performance and quality. Thank you. It's super high.

Put it simply. Saying those parameters is a headache. Ok, I'll tell you the advantages and disadvantages of these two cars respectively.

First of all, Jetta, advantages: anti-building, acceleration, fuel saving, good passability, good climbing performance, cross-flow scavenging Ea 1 13 dual-valve cast iron engine. Features 100 accelerates quickly. 100 after the hunchback and panting helicopter. Disadvantages: the rear shock absorption is easy to break, the butt of the booster sleeve collapses, the door creaks, and the gear lever is awkward. The waiting speed of cold start is unstable, and the throttle valve is easy to get dirty. Because it is a cross-flow scavenging two-valve engine, it is easy to deposit carbon.

Advantages of Zhijun: B-class car, business, atmosphere, fuel saving, poor acceleration, better and more comfortable interior than Jetta. EA 1 12 cast iron engine 100 was killed by Jetta. Jetta 100 was spiked.

Disadvantages: air leakage in the door, abnormal noise in the inner room, narrow field of vision, unstable waiting speed of the engine, and collision.

Jetta is cheap to maintain and easy to repair, not as advanced as Zhijun engine. In terms of quality, Jetta is resistant to manufacturing.