Wing Chun, Sanda, Xingyiquan, Boxing and Karate, which street fighting is the most practical? Which is more practical?

I used to think it was Sanda, but now I think it is traditional martial arts.

Sanda, as a challenge technique, is still excellent.

However, why is traditional Wushu superior to Sanda in street combat?

There are many reasons, mainly:

1. Traditional Wushu is a summary of folk street fighting techniques. Many techniques of Sanda seem to be practical, but their practical application is flawed. For example, Sanda, which looks like a scientific posture, protects the head more than traditional martial arts, but in fact, in irregular fighting, the body and crotch need more protection, even more than the head. If you look at wing chun, it will be more perfect.

2. Without the protection of boxing gloves, the head-holding defense is very fragile, and blocking is more reasonable than the head-holding defense.

3. In the case of using weapons, the leg method can only be used as an auxiliary attack, not as the main attack means. (The main attack must be weapons), not to mention improving your legs.

4. It is different to hit people without boxing gloves, as Bruce Lee also said. Do you know why traditional martial arts use palms? Because the vibration of the palm can easily hurt people's internal organs.

That's all I know.

So my ranking is: 1, Wing Chun, Xingyiquan 2, Sanda 3, Boxing, Karate.