Compared with Japanese, China is a real maritime power. Can you give me a detailed comparison? Thank you.

China is just a coastal continental country, and has never been a maritime power in history.

China has a long land border and many neighboring countries, including more than one country with strong military strength. So China had to keep a strong army, which doomed China to throw himself into the sea.

In contrast, Japan, as an island country, not only has the thinking of a maritime nation, but also has the thinking of a maritime nation and a profound naval tradition. In particular, it does not have to maintain a huge army. So it can throw itself into the sea.

If China had a naval competition with Japan, it would almost certainly be as thankless as the naval competition between Germany and Britain before the First World War.

Whether France is competing with Britain in the world or the former Soviet Union is wrestling with the United States. In the end, mainland countries like France and the Soviet Union lost to maritime countries because their national strength could not be maintained.

China should learn a lesson. Is it necessary to challenge its maritime hegemony with drums and gongs before the world leader really rises and is still in its infancy (after all, the United States is behind Japan)?

How to locate the goal of developing China Navy?

The navy is a service that burns money. Only by combining it with economic benefits can we achieve the balance between input and output and achieve sustainable and benign development.

Instead of clinging to breaking through the island chain of the western Pacific like attacking the city and pulling out the village, it is better to look to the Indian Ocean in the west.

Africa is the future of China. Whether it is investment, or energy and raw material supply. In the future 100, the Indian Ocean will be the lifeline of China.

At least China's navy is not aimed at the United States, but should be put into use in Assange's territory.