The difference between Barnard's system organization theory and traditional organization theory

Barnard broke the traditional organizational theory, that is, the view that power comes from the superior. He believes that power does not come from the boss's administrative authorization, but from the acceptance of subordinates. Only when subordinates understand the administrative orders and think that they are in line with organizational goals and personal interests will they be accepted.

Therefore, an organization cannot rely solely on the authorization and power orders of its superiors, but must obtain the unanimous support and cooperation of all personnel. Barnard's unique understanding of organizational power is a great contribution to organizational theory.

The main points of Barnard's organization theory are:

Barnard believes that an organization is a cooperative system between people, and he defines an organization as "a system of activities or forces that two or more people consciously coordinate". His definition of organization emphasizes the cooperation between people in the organization and the sociality and systematicness of the organization itself. This has deepened the understanding of the organization from the perspective of sociology.

Barnard also pointed out that due to the inconsistency between personal goals and social goals, we must attach importance to the relationship between "effectiveness" and "efficiency". Effectiveness refers to the realization of organizational goals, and efficiency refers to the satisfaction of personal goals. Without efficiency, an organization cannot be effective. If personal goals are not achieved, the organization is inefficient and cannot continue to exist.