Also a defender who leads the era of small ball, why can't Nash become Curry?

Next, I will talk about the reason why Nash, who also led the era of small balls, could not surpass Curry. To sum up, there are three points:

First, the team system is different. Nash's sun is mainly from 2004-2005 season to 2009-20 10 season. At that time, his teammates were mainly Sta Damel and Marion, as well as the best sixth man Barbosa (who joined in 2003-2004 and played for 7 years) and Joe Johnson (20065438+). Four years), boris diaw (2005-2006 season, four years), Raza Bell (2005-2006 season, four years), Quentin Richardson (2004-2005 season only), grant hill (2007-2008 season, five years).

The best year for the Suns is undoubtedly the season when Nash and Stoudemire just joined (2004-2005). They went from a western downstream team to 62 wins and 20 losses in that year, all the way to the western conference finals in the playoffs, but lost to the Spurs. Lost to Mavericks in 2005-2006 season, and lost to Lakers in 2009-20 10 season.

It should be said that the Suns' attack was very strong, but it must be mentioned that their poor defense has been criticized. Even in the past three years, the primary reason is the configuration of their team. There is basically no orthodox center. Before Stoudemire went to play center, Marion's height and weight had been seriously lost, and the defense was very difficult. Let's compare the data of their gain and loss points and color zone loss points in these three years with the three years when the Warriors won the championship.

In contrast, it should be said that the sun's score data has been completely crushed. The Warriors' 67 wins and two years are not mentioned for the time being. The record of 20 17-20 18 season should be close to that of the suns. Even so, the Warriors lost 6.7 points, and the Suns lost points in the 2009-20 10 season. It can be seen that warriors are also thin inside. More points lost in the color zone can explain the problem. The defensive problems of the Suns are really worrying. How do you say "defense is the best attack"? It is futile to defend a big colander and then attack, so the sun can't go too far.

Second, the league situation is different. We know that the year when the Warriors won the championship was the 20 14-20 15 season. It should be said that since those years, the league pattern has been relatively clear. The GDP of Spurs, Mavericks and Lakers in the west has also declined, and the rising Thunder is still a little young. In the east, except for James' knight, the green shirt army is still relatively hard, and the Raptors are ok, and others. Therefore, in those years, the warriors in Curry basically had no rivals in the west, leaving only the knights in the east to compete, reaching the finals for five consecutive years, facing the Cavaliers four times and winning three of them.

On the contrary, during Nash's several seasons in the Suns, the league can be said to be competing with each other. It should be said that until the Celtics formed the Big Three in the 2007-2008 season, the league rarely held a group to keep warm, and each team was equal in strength. Almost every year, the championship changes hands (of course, in 2009-20 1 1 season, the Lakers won it twice in a row), and it is even more difficult to win it again. The Lakers, Mavericks and Spurs in the west are all hard bones, and the Pistons, Heat and Celtics in the east. It should be said that it is quite difficult to break through in the west, because we also know that the west is strong and the east is weak.

Third, the question of coincidence When it comes to the three champions of the Warriors, to be honest, on the one hand, they rely on the offensive ability and the success of small ball tactics of their Huashui brothers and Durant. On the other hand, their champion also has great chance. Especially in the first championship, it can be seen that even though the Warriors can play the first regular season record in the league in 20 14-20 15 season, the Cavaliers have three giants, but in that year's finals, Love decided to reimburse the dislocated elbow, and then the first injured season in Owen Finals was reimbursed, leaving James alone to carry the banner. If there is no "Death" in the next two championships, it may not be easy for the Warriors to win the championship easily.

Although Nash has Stoudemire here, the series and attack of the team depend entirely on Nash. Once Nash is lost on the court, the Sun's attack cannot be launched. In contrast, the Warriors have many all-star players who can lead the team. This is the horror of the peak warrior.

Curry and Nash are both small guards and members of the 180 club. Nash's three-pointers are superb, even better in passing ability, although Nash has only won the MVP in the regular season twice. At that time, the Suns were the first team to play small ball. So, the question is, why can't Nash be Curry? Ok, please "go to the sea" to show you the way slowly.

Nash and Curry were in different times. Nash and Curry are actually two types of point guards. Nash's series of organization and projection is actually a variant of the traditional point guard. Curry is the representative of the point guard in the new era, with unparalleled projection ability. Although Nash also has super projection ability, his explosive power is not as good as Curry's.

The so-called "three madness of the brave" often begins with a wave of consecutive scores in Curry. Although the sun and the warriors are shelling, there are still great differences. The system created by warriors is more perfect and innovative on the basis of predecessors. In fact, Sun's system failed to get rid of the inherent defects of shelling and break through the original framework.

The bombardment in Nash's era does not mean three points, but more is to pass Nash's breakthrough to his teammates with the greatest opportunity through his creativity. The Suns don't have many pitchers, and Nash's shooting percentage is not high. More people have found teammates like Smalian Richardson Hill. The most intuitive performance is that the pick-and-roll of the Warriors basically bounced out, and the sun mostly cut in.

Another factor is that it belonged to the center era of Duncan and Shaq. As a bully, Nash had no choice but to be hacked one year. I believe everyone knows that Nash's organization series is the sun's greatest weapon.

Summary: Nash and Curry lived in different times, and I think they are equally great.

Also a defender who leads the era of small ball, why can't Nash become Curry? How great is Curry? Just look at the data!

1, Curry opened the court space with three-pointers, and more offensive tactics can be evolved. Shrinking defense is no longer a habit. Larger court space can improve the game appreciation, and the attack is smoother. More choices can be evolved from three-pointers tactics. This is what Curry means to the Warriors. 18- 19 season, fourth quarter of game 5 of the western conference semifinals 14 points, and 33 points at half-time of game 6. 17- 18 season in the third quarter. 15- 16 season came back from injury, and the overtime score against trailblazer G4 was 17. The West reversed the Thunder in three consecutive games with 33+8+7, and directly defeated Durant with a fatal three-pointer in the fourth quarter. 14- 15 season finals averaged 10.8 points in the fourth quarter, second only to O 'Neill in 2000 in recent 20 years.

2, 18- 19 season western conference finals, averaging 37+8+8, sweeping the lead 4-0. /kloc-play the lone ranger in the first round of the playoffs in 0/6 season. After the first game, the lone ranger decisively sacrificed Durant's tactics. As a result, he continued to use the whole series, and Durant's shooting percentage was only 36.8%. /kloc-In 0/6, the Western Warriors hit Durant by releasing Radisson, making him hit only 40% in four of seven games. Durant scored 2 points in the crucial moment of ClutcheTime 65438+9 in the whole series. Durant said helplessly, "I have been making mistakes and playing in the crowd. They sent two or three people to intercept me. I tried very hard. Maybe I should shoot directly at three people. "

3. Curry is obviously superior to Durant in how to deal with the problem better when facing double-teaming. He can switch between the scoring machine and the offensive command master at will. No player has ever dared to say that he ignores the double-team. Even if Jordan, Kobe and James are all under the double-team, he dare not say that the double-team is useless.

Summary: Although the Warrior is the peak of Curry, it may not be so great without the Warrior System.

Conclusion Curry feels that he is throwing something. Even if you attack me, I can hit it from a distance. And Nash, first of all, he has top shooting skills and three-point ability in a row, but more than half of his shots come from empty seats or teammates are uncomfortable. If Nash hits several three-point opponents in a row, Nash will definitely not continue to vote, because at this level of space, he will definitely find the missing person. Stand up when your teammates miss the shot, and attract defense when you feel hot to create a gap for your teammates. This is the value of Nash's two MVPs.

If you only look at personal data, it is better to look at the database. One more thing, there was a bully inside at that time, which decided the balance between inside and outside. At the beginning, the warriors only had a splash. Basically, whoever held it threw it, giving them a few years to temper and change. Now even D 'Antoni regrets it. If Nash is given more right to fire, history may go in another direction.

Therefore, it is not certain that Nash will not become Curry. If Curry had been with the Suns, he might not have achieved such good results. what do you think? Let's have a look at this table.

Nash created the shelling tactics, Curry created the small ball era, and the two great point guards led different styles of offensive systems in their respective eras. Nash is a traditional point guard with the ability of elite projection and historical organization. Curry, on the other hand, is an emerging projective point guard, relying on unprecedented three points, successfully leading the league to a new era.

As a frequent visitor to the 180 club, Nash won no less honors than Curry in the regular season, winning the MVP twice and assisting five times, and was selected for a period of time for three consecutive years. This performance is excellent enough. Why didn't Nash reach Curry's height in his career?

Sun's shelling tactics didn't do it. Why did the Warriors succeed? They are all historical point guards. Why didn't Nash succeed like Curry? The biggest problem lies in defense rather than attack. Taking the 2004-05 season as an example, the Suns' offensive efficiency in the regular season was 1 12.7 (League No.65438 +0), and in the playoffs it was 1 16.7 (League No.65438 +0). Even in the playoffs, in the Western Conference series against the Spurs, the Sun's overall shooting percentage was as high as 49%, and the three-point shooting percentage was as high as 4 1.3%. It takes 800 to kill a thousand enemies. Although the Suns rely on shelling to play a very high offensive efficiency on the offensive end, the lack of effective defense as a support, especially in the playoffs that emphasize defense, will make the Suns suffer a lot. Especially in the Western Conference series against the Spurs, the Sun's defensive problems are vividly reflected. In the five series, the Sun's total GDP of the Spurs averaged 27.4 points, 23.2 points and 22.2 points respectively. In contrast, in the whole playoffs in 2004-05, the combined GDP was 23.6 points, 16.0 points and 16.6 points respectively.

Except Marion, the other five starters of the Suns have some defensive problems. The sun with great disparity in strength will inevitably be despised and eliminated in the face of the spurs, which are integrated with offense and defense. This season's "The Lone Ranger" and "Mosaic" are good examples. Although the offensive efficiency is the top two in the league, the mediocre defensive ability of the two teams can not support the stability of the two teams' records. Although the Suns have fallen to the west for two years in a row, on the one hand, the defensive shortcomings of the Suns are too obvious, on the other hand, the Suns also lack an efficient singles player. If Nash and Stoudemire are compared to the Splash Brothers, then the Suns still lack a Durant on the offensive end. This also proves the helplessness of the small ball market in disguise. The luxury of the five-star warrior lineup is not comparable to that of the sun. Not only is the starting lineup not as luxurious as the Warriors, but the strength of the bench cannot be compared with it. In those days, Sun Bench, except the sixth man Babes, can be used as a surprise point, and other players are only third-rate. If the Suns have the lineup configuration at the peak of the Warriors, Nash's historical position is not necessarily lower than Curry's. After all, Curry didn't get the MVP in the finals.

Nash's personal strength is not inferior to Curry's, but unfortunately, neither Nash nor Curry has that explosive physical quality. The former increases the skill talent for the organization, while the latter increases the skill talent for three aspects. This is an inevitable result, in terms of its era. Even though Nash's skill talent chooses organization, his three-point ability is excellent, with a career three-point shooting rate as high as 42.8% and an average of 1.4. You know, this is done in an era of higher defensive intensity and lower three-point status. If we put Nash into today's era, Nash's three-point score is not necessarily worse than Curry's.

Fate made man, and Nash met the peak GDP, which also doomed Nash to be difficult to succeed. At that time, the spurs won the championship every base year, and the core lineup was stable for a long time. Coupled with the offensive and defensive dominance of Duncan and head coach Popovich, if we put today's warriors in that era, maybe Curry will live like Nash for a lifetime.

As the saying goes, times make heroes. With the gradual decline of the Twin Towers model and the inside line, coupled with the gradual promotion of offensive in the league, the dominance of outside players gradually surpassed that of inside players. From the 2007-08 season to the 18- 19 season, none of the MVP in the regular season was an inside player, while the MVP in the finals was from 20 1 1-65438+. The outbreak of Curry and the operation of the Warriors, together with Cole's coaching, made success inevitable.

It's not that Nash is not good enough. He won the MVP in the regular season for two consecutive years in the era when the inside was dominant. This is not a simple matter. During the ten years from 65438 to 0996-2006, no outside player won the MVP in the regular season except Nash. During this decade, four inside players won the MVP once or twice, while only three outside players won the MVP, except Jordan's two. There are many powerful stars in NBA history, but only a few players really have the right time and place. Although Nash didn't win a championship in his career and didn't lead an era like Curry, it is undeniable that Nash's gorgeous style and excellent ability are really commendable.

That's right! Nash took D 'Antoni's escape tactics to the extreme as early as the sun! At that time, they didn't have a good insider, and the bully Stoudemire played the position of power forward, and Marion was also a power forward. In a real sense, the Suns are typical small ball tactical players, focusing on projection, and fast offensive and defensive conversion is their foundation! So why didn't Nash succeed in the era of small balls? And Curry succeeded? I might as well make a brief comment on this issue. ...

The difference between Nash and Curry is that the function is too single. Simply put, Nash belongs to the traditional point guard, and his advantage is that he is good at organizing and passing the ball. He is skilled in ball control and has a very broad vision of passing. He always observes the position of his teammates. Once a teammate is found vacant, his passing can always achieve the best effect. However, Nash's disadvantage is that he can't play without the ball. If there is no ball in hand, Nash is basically no threat and can't play his advantage!

Curry is different. He belongs to a dual-energy defender. Curry is no less than Nash in possession of the ball. Both hands can control the ball well. Although the breakthrough speed is not fast, the rhythm is well mastered. In addition, Curry is more capable of projecting from outside. His three-pointer is undoubtedly a nightmare for defenders. The most important thing is that Curry can play the tactics of running without the ball. Even if there is no ball in his hand, he can find a shooting opportunity by running.

To put it bluntly, Curry is more comprehensive than Nash!

Another important factor is that Curry's Warriors have more people to handle the ball, making it easier to play as a whole, while Nash's Suns don't have so many people to dominate the ball. Take the Warriors in the 20 14-20 15 season as an example!

That season, their core lineup was Curry, Thompson, Barnes, Green and Bogut, and there were Igdala and Livingston on the bench.

There are many people who can dominate the ball in this lineup, but their organizational core is not Curry, but power forward Green. The advantage of being organized by Green is to reduce the burden on Curry. Curry can play more efficiently on the offensive end without holding the ball too much!

On the bench, Igdala became the organizational core of that team. His presence is similar to Green's role on the court, and both of them can revitalize the team's offense. At the same time, Bogut can organize a series of teams inside. In this way, Curry, Thompson and Barnes on the outside have many opportunities to shoot in the open space. When these perimeter players are running, it is difficult for the opponent's defense to find the defensive focus. No player dares to be empty, or he will pay the price!

However, Nash is different. His Suns have neither Green nor Igdala, and there is no organizer like Bogut. Most of the organizational responsibility falls on Nash's shoulders, and this kind of play is more likely to be targeted, so the opponent's defense only needs to be directed at Nash. As long as he is strangled at this point, it will be difficult for the Sun to play smoothly, thus failing to give full play to the advantages of small ball tactics!

Not all teams can play ball tactics! The success of the Warriors is inseparable from the existence of Curry, and their success is difficult to replicate! A master of passing and a master of three points, one lies in the technical field of passing and the other lies in unreasonable three points. Curry conquered everyone with his three points.

There is such a strange phenomenon in NBA, which is obviously shelling. Why did the Warriors become popular in the league in recent years, but the Sun, the originator of shelling, failed to attract other teams in the league to follow suit? They are also defenders who lead the era of small ball. Why are things different between Nash and Curry? In fact, there are two main reasons, please continue to listen to me in detail.

First of all, they live in different times.

The so-called times make heroes, this sentence is also applicable in the NBA. Nash lived in the era of traditional center play, and players in all positions performed their duties. Although three-pointers can also play a certain role, they are far less important than now. So even though Nash can be selected for the "180 Club" all the year round, his three-pointer influence is limited, and his role is more inclined to organize the team's attack. As a traditional point guard, Nash can win the MVP twice in a row, which proves that he has the strongest strength in the position of point guard.

Therefore, it can't be said that Nash can't be Curry. Both of them are excellent point guards, but they live in different times and have different influences.

Second, both of them have their own merits, and Curry's three points are even better.

Nash's ability to control the ball and his vision of passing the ball belong to the master level, so combing the team's attack is the best choice for him, which also coincides with the fact that the team has players with super physical talents such as Stoudemire and Richardson, who will take turns bombing the opponent's basket as soon as they get to speed. Therefore, the shelling tactics of Sun era focused more on scoring bombing inside. Nash's vision of the overall situation and passing the ball made him a good wedding dress for his teammates, so all kinds of incredible and unconstrained assists followed.

Curry belongs to another kind of point guard. His focus is not on organizing the team's attack. He is very aggressive on the offensive end, especially the three-pointers. With this advantage, he is undoubtedly the absolute core of the team's attack. However, the appearance of Curry made the position of the point guard, which was already vague, even more vague, so he simply gave up the traditional point guard style and focused on the offensive end. There is no doubt that three-pointers are more valuable than two-pointers, and Curry's high hit rate makes him more valuable, so the more you throw, the more accurate you are. People like to see players use three points to improve the enjoyment of the game, and sponsors are more willing. This has also become a kind of * * * knowledge, both the audience and the players are shouting for the wonderful three-pointers, so the evolutionary version of the shelling tactics has become popular.

So, this is the difference between Nash and Curry. As an old fan, he will be more keen on Nash's style of play, and fans in the new era will naturally prefer Curry's style of play. No one is better than anyone else, but the tastes of fans have changed.

No matter how the times change and how the league plays, one thing is certain: Nash and Curry are both representatives in the position of point guard.

Thank you for inviting me. First of all, because of this picture, let's take this opportunity to remember the great Kobe Bryant together. Bryant! Moreover, Nash's personal ability is not much worse than Curry's, but his grades and historical status are much lower. The main reason is that he lost by luck. He didn't meet a good team and coach at the beginning of his career and was treated unfairly at the peak. Nash's scoring ability at the peak was not as good as Curry's. His average score on the regular court never exceeded 20+ in one season, and only reached 20+ in two seasons in the playoffs. However, the shooting percentage is higher than Curry's, which has remained above 50% in all six regular games and above 40% in three points. He is far superior to Curry in possession and control errors. In five seasons, the average assists in the regular court exceeded 10, and the mistakes were controlled at about three times. Curry has never averaged more than 7 assists per game in any season, and his mistakes are basically more than 3 times.

But although he didn't win the championship, his leading ability was not weaker than Curry's, and his personal ability was not much worse than Curry's at the peak. The technical characteristics of the whole profession are different! Nash Curry is a high-quality point guard, but there are still some differences between them. Nash prefers organization, and Curry prefers scoring.

Compared with Curry's road to winning the championship, it is very lucky. 20 15 the clippers, the biggest rival in the west, were eliminated in the semi-finals due to negligence and entered the finals without any suspense. In the finals, the opponent knight also reimbursed Owen after falling in love. In the end, they beat the isolated James 4-2 to win the championship. After the failure of 20 16, Durant, the top three superstar in the league at that time, actually found him, so the two men cooperated to win two championships again.

NBA is a stage that depends on both strength and luck, and there will be a big gap between the honors and achievements of players with similar competitive strength!

Therefore, Nash's strength is not worse than Curry's, but maybe it's just luck. If there is no conflict in Horry in the 2007 playoffs ... it's a pity that there is no if in competitive sports!

Nash and Curry are two styles of defenders, Nash is the main force of passing and Curry is the main force of attacking. Nash has two MVPs, five assists, eight All-Stars and three best players in his career. He is the absolute core of the Suns, and the excellent consciousness alliance of offensive and defensive transformation is unparalleled. What is most underestimated is his scoring ability, which has all the qualities of an excellent scorer. In fact, his teammate Hill said: If Nash is selfish, he can easily win the scoring championship.

The problem itself has a problem. Is Nash's era the era of small balls? If it counts, it is also the beginning of the rise of the ball and the end of Nash's career, so it is not representative. The question is, why can't Nash be Curry? On the contrary, can Curry be Nash? Everyone is an independent individual, and every star has his own distinctive characteristics. You can't simply say who can be who.

Nash and Curry are both in the No.1 position. Nash emphasizes organization, and Curry has more outstanding scoring ability. Nash is a member of 180 club, and Curry's organizational ability is equally outstanding. Nash is like a commander, making his teammates integrate into the team well, and he is a master of running and blasting. Curry's three-point shot is extremely fast and has a high hit rate, which often attracts double doubles to create opportunities for teammates.

If Curry focuses on organization, I think Curry can average double digits in assists per game. If Nash focuses on scoring, he can average a considerable number of points per game. Are they still the people we know? Therefore, players should give full play to their strengths, foster strengths and avoid weaknesses, and become the most special self with their own unique labels.

Curry, Marion and Stoudemire can't be a climate at all! The latter two have no projection ability at all. In 2008, they didn't blow the whistle, which interfered with Curry's ball, so that Curry couldn't find the shooting rhythm! There is no second Thompson to mobilize his defense. Can this ball win?