Why can't many old audiences of Beijing Opera accept the innovation of Beijing Opera? What do you think of this?

Rather than saying that the old audience of Beijing opera can't accept Beijing opera innovation, it is better to ask what Beijing opera innovation refers to! Beijing opera model opera, modern Beijing opera, is it Beijing opera? If this topic is controversial, what are the artistic characteristics of traditional Peking Opera? What are the characteristics of modern Peking Opera?

The original name of modern Peking Opera is Revolutionary Modern Peking Opera, Revolutionary Modern Peking Opera Model Opera and Model Opera. Modern Peking Opera began to appear in the late Cultural Revolution. Peking Opera is defined by traditional Peking Opera, and based on the classic figures and stories of historical tradition, it mainly tells stories such as historical figures and folklore.

The most outstanding innovation of modern Peking Opera is the theme, which takes the production and life of modern China people as the story, including the story of revolutionary struggle under the leadership of China's * * * production party.

Beijing opera performance is basically the pursuit of freehand brushwork, and the stage performance is as suitable as possible for virtual beautification. For example, Beijing opera characters outline their shapes according to their faces and perform stylized performances according to their personalities.

One reason is that drama is no longer a fashionable popular art.

Film, television and other emerging art forms completely occupy the vast majority of the audience. Audiences who are still interested in drama, especially Beijing opera, have a good understanding and interest in Beijing opera. This kind of audience must be very familiar with the classic parts of Beijing opera, and it is difficult to have * * * songs for new plays that have not yet become classics or are unfamiliar.

You can't throw away the original old dramas, just like ancient villages, ancient streets, ancient trees and ancients. In Shang Yan, you can't just think about making money, but the society needs various styles of entertainment in artistic situations to meet the requirements of the audience. Li Yugang, Degang Guo and Shanghai Peking Opera Theatre all did well. Please don't set them against Beijing Opera! Just let a hundred flowers blossom, just ask for a lower fare so that ordinary people can afford it!

This is different from the movie audience.

Few people want to watch a movie of a movie star constantly, but only some viewers who are quite in-depth in this field can do it. Then their views on some new films will be compared with similar classic works, which is often difficult to agree with.

Many new historical dramas appeared before the Cultural Revolution, such as Wild Pig Forest by Li, Orphan of Zhao by Ma, Tan and Qiu, Official History by Ma and Battle of Red Cliffs. Very good. Several model operas arranged during the Cultural Revolution are also very good.

Like Tang poetry and Song poetry, Peking Opera has a strict framework.

The framework of Peking Opera is stricter than the metrical framework of poetry, because Peking Opera not only has the metrical framework of singing, but also has strict requirements on singing, movements, and even clothing and makeup. The so-called singing opera is one-sided. If there is innovation, it is subversion of Beijing opera, not Beijing opera.

Who says old audiences don't accept Beijing opera innovation? Suolin Capsule, Luoshen, Zhao's Orphan, Wild Pig Forest, Hai Rui's dismissal from office, etc., which is not an innovative drama? The key is to see how and where you innovate! Beijing opera must add drama and film performance, and there are opera and even fashion shows on the stage of Beijing opera. Is this innovation? Is it innovative to make Tianjin steamed buns taste like "barbecued pork" and Beijing roast duck taste like "curry"? Or destroy tradition? Mei Lanfang, Cheng, Kirin Tong, Ma and other masters, which one is not innovative on the basis of traditional opera? But like some "innovations" now, I really dare not compliment!