At the beginning, the mainstream said that Degang Guo's cross talk was too vulgar, and Degang Guo's response was too Japanese. What did he say?

The mainstream said that Degang Guo's cross talk was too vulgar, but Degang Guo responded. There is naked hatred among peers, and our vulgarity is popular. Bao Zhenpei, a famous literature professor at Nankai University in China, once published an article satirizing the vulgarity and flattery of Degang Guo's crosstalk performance. In his article, he bluntly said that Degang Guo's crosstalk lines are not only vulgar, but also like the kiln tune in a brothel. Other mainstream professors commented that Degang Guo Deyun Society was a kind of cultural hooligan and hooligan culture, and he simply disdained to evaluate Degang Guo's cartoon sketches. Jiang Kun, Degang Guo's sworn enemy, once commented that Degang Guo's cross talk was really ugly and not elegant at all.

First, elegance and vulgarity are not contradictory. They can reward elegance and vulgarity. Generally speaking, literary writers prefer elegant literary works such as Chun Xue, but have little interest in popular literature of Xialiba people. However, Degang Guo's response to his peers' comments on his cross talk and sketch performance is really vulgar, which inevitably brings hatred and contempt among peers. This also reflects that there is no tolerance and tolerance among peers, and there is even an ugly jealousy. He always thinks that the vulgarity of his works is only popular, which is different from the evaluation of some professors and mainstream drama Jiang Kun. There is no contradiction between elegance and vulgarity, and many works can also enjoy both elegance and vulgarity.

Second, although members of Deyun Society have low academic qualifications, their culture is very high. Although most of Deyun's disciples only stay at the junior high school level, this cannot be the main reason for their vulgar satires. Education is not everything, and many experts and literature professors may have some academic bias when evaluating the vulgarity of Deyun's cross talk. The members of Deyun Society have traveled all over the country and have rich life experience and common sense of culture and history. Therefore, their works are not necessarily vulgar.

Thirdly, Deyun Society occupies half of the crosstalk entertainment circle in China, and it is common to be suppressed by the mainstream. One minute on the stage and ten years off the stage, Deyun Society can achieve today's achievements, which is also the result of the efforts of countless predecessors and apprentices. The success of Deyun Society naturally threatens the interests of some mainstream opera groups. In order to safeguard their own interests, they choose to constantly belittle Deyun Society and suppress Deyun Society. Take Jiang Kun as an example. He has never dealt with Degang Guo. It is common for them to taunt each other on their respective social media. Therefore, in the face of Jiang Kun and others' evaluation of Deyun Society, we should keep our rational judgment.

I have to admit that it is very rare for Degang Guo to take his time in the face of others' suppression or even insult to himself or Deyun Society.