The photographic process of artistic photography

This is a typical definition of traditional ontological logic, which is given from the principle that photography is a process. The first is the dichotomy of "process" and "result". Photography occupies the process, and then the dichotomy of "plane" and "three-dimensional". Photography occupies the plane, followed by "real scene" and "virtual object", and then photography occupies the physical object. After such a continuous classification process, the definition of photography was obtained. If separation occupies the opposite side, another definition may be such a face: "XX is the process of making the virtual things get the image representation or reflection on the plane from the sensory impression", and we can call XX in this definition a logical painting. Therefore, compared with painting, photography has the opposite meaning. If photography is relative to film and television, then the process of separation will continue, and then the static will be separated, and photography will occupy the static state. If, depending on the development of technology, a new image mode appears in the future, then this separation process will have to continue, and there seems to be no end. For example, the appearance of digital images raises a new question about the definition of photography. Is it to integrate digital images of virtual reality into photography? Or continue to insist on separation?