Sanda, Muay Thai, Taekwondo, Aikido, Karate and traditional martial arts, which is more powerful?

1: It still depends on age. For example, Sanda and Muay Thai are not suitable for developing children, because they are relatively high-intensity training, while taekwondo and karate are not as high as the first two.

2. Availability, Sanda. Karate. Muay Thai will be more practical in actual combat, not to say that Taekwondo is not good. The spread of Taekwondo must have its significance. You need more time and experience to practice in actual combat. Compared with Taekwondo, the first three things need less time and are faster.

3. Applicability: If it's just fitness, it's ok. If you want to practice Muay Thai well, you will hurt your health. Some people say that Muay Thai masters will not live past 60. Sanda, as long as the physical development can almost withstand the training intensity, the effect is remarkable. Karate, like Taekwondo, belongs to a variety of technical sports styles, while Muay Thai and Sanda belong to vigorous martial arts with few movements but strong explosive force and physical strength. Personally, karate and Sanda are more suitable if you need to protect yourself and exercise.

Traditional Wushu does not explain, not to say that it is impossible. It takes too long to lay the foundation. Aikido knows nothing.

The characteristics of moves are described in detail in Baidu (the above are purely personal opinions, if you have any comments. . . )

So if you are a college student or have already worked, I recommend you to learn Sanda.

Speaking of being good, I'll go. Whether you are good or not depends on how you learn. There is no strong martial arts, only the extent to which users practice.