Does China's traditional philosophy emphasize the inequality of life?

There are many schools of traditional China's philosophy, but many schools think that people are born unequal, which is called transcendentalism or heroism, including many ancient philosophers in China, who seem to have such "thinking limitations". Generally speaking, since the pre-Qin period, there have been many philosophers' theories of "three qualities of sex", that is, there are superior people who are born with wisdom and kindness, middle people who need to learn good and evil, and inferior people who are born with evil. However, there are also arguments that all men are created equal, such as the classic argument that people are born different, just like falling flowers, where they fall is accidental, but they are all falling flowers, and they are all the same. Later, around the Song Dynasty, Neo-Confucianism appeared, and people began to think that people were born with "reason", all of which were the same, just because they got different "qi", so people were different. So I think China's traditional philosophy is still developing this judgment.

I think it's amazing. I think the reason why people are born different comes from education, just like the story we have all heard, that is, herding sheep, selling sheep, marrying a wife, having children and letting children herd sheep. Such children may be the same as those born in "nobility", but they are different because of their different education and concepts. It is said that swift horses are common and Bole is not common, but it seems to be opportunistic. It's still a little like what I said before. People may be born similar, but they are "educated" like "Qi", so they are different. Think about it, China's simple philosophy is quite reasonable ~

This is my opinion ~ where are my parents ~