What is the difference between the Renaissance in China and the New Culture Movement in treating traditional culture?

Different Renaissance uses and develops classical culture, making it a tool to oppose feudal system, under the banner of reviving classical literature and art ... China New Culture Movement has absolutely positive or negative views on eastern and western cultures. For example, the slogan put forward at that time was "Down with Kongjiadian", advocating new morality, opposing old morality, advocating new literature, opposing old literature, advocating democracy and science, and opposing tyranny, ignorance and superstition. He held a negative attitude towards China's traditional morality and past literature.

The reason for the above differences is that during the Renaissance in Europe, the bourgeoisie at that time was still weak and could not directly put forward the slogan of opposing feudal autocratic rule, but could only be realized by reviving classical literature and art. In the New Culture Movement in China, Confucianism, the core of China's traditional culture, was always attached importance by feudal rulers, and the feudal ruling forces in China were very stubborn. During the rule of Beiyang warlords, respecting Confucius' retro style became more and more serious. Therefore, the old things have a deep influence and cannot be overcorrected. At that time, the radical Democrats took this extreme approach and absolutely denied our traditional culture.