Which is more suitable for children, traditional education or innovative education?

Traditional education and innovative education should be complementary, not selective. They are not an either-or relationship, nor a necessary choice. Instead, they can have a certain focus. Personal advice is still based on traditional education. Traditional education is the foundation. Although innovative education is important, it is meaningless if there is not enough knowledge reserve as the basis.

Traditional education is the basis for students to master knowledge. For example, mathematics and physical chemistry are the basic things that a science major must master. None of these can be mastered, and no matter how good the sense of innovation is, nothing can be learned. Because you don't understand the basic law of today's world, it is just something that people must abide by under the framework. You can't succeed if you violate this law. If you don't understand these things, the sense of innovation is useless. Can't learn anything.

Innovative education is to improve children's ability to use knowledge. After he has mastered the basic knowledge, he will have divergent thinking. He will definitely think about how to use this knowledge to create more useful things. This innovative thinking may be reflected not only in science students, but also in liberal arts students. For example, professional economic management and financial law corresponding to liberal arts also need some innovation. This is a question of life development prospects. You have a good sense of innovation and put forward a very.

Innovative education is the development direction of traditional education. Traditional education should gradually incorporate some teaching methods into innovative education, but it should not be completely abandoned. Jin Ping's numerous historical facts show that if there is to be development, there must be innovation, but we can't completely deny the past, which has no foundation and will never have long-term development.