What's the difference between reading a book and using a knowledge-based payment platform?

The biggest difference between reading and knowledge payment platform is that the channels for acquiring knowledge are different.

I think it is one of the most effective ways to acquire knowledge through books, because the knowledge that books can convey is very comprehensive, and you can have a more self-understanding of the contents in books, which is a better way in learning.

However, it is precisely because everyone's self-learning ability is different, so if you teach yourself through books, the input-output ratio is very different. It may take you two or three days to finish reading a book, but under various factors, the knowledge you can learn may be just a scratch, so as far as I am concerned, I seldom learn directly through books, but books are one of the important sources of knowledge, which I don't deny.

Learning through the knowledge payment platform, because learning is carried out under the talents in a certain field, can obtain the corresponding knowledge content more efficiently, which is more cost-effective from the input-output ratio.

In the field of knowledge payment, consumers focus on one thing for content consumption and content acquisition. For example, the courses related to guitar learning that I subscribed to on the short book platform are all focused on guitar learning. In the existing course time, I can effectively and efficiently acquire the corresponding guitar knowledge, which is more useful to consumers.

But in the end, books and knowledge payment platforms can coexist, and there is no competitive relationship between them, just different ways to acquire knowledge. Their main purpose is to learn, and their learning methods can be understood each other.