[help] Which is more conducive to the development of literature, traditional literature or Internet literature?

Network literature is a newly emerged literary style, it refers to the Internet as a publishing platform and communication media, with the help of hypertext connection and multimedia interpretation of the means to express the theme, online creation and publication for Internet users to read the literary works, literary texts and contains part of the literary components of the network of art, which is based on the network of original literary works.

The main difference between traditional literature and Internet literature lies in the publishing platform. Internet literature will be published on the Internet as a platform and medium of communication, while traditional literature is published on paper materials. Both the positive and negative sides will press the other side to refute from the point of view of the medium of communication. Let's say traditional culture would say that paper has fewer typos, is more logical, and has beautiful writing (note that some of these points are shared by both sides). You can also list examples: Lu Xun wrote traditional literature, which influenced several generations of Chinese people, has such a Lu Xun appeared in network literature? Network literature has Confucius, Russell Rowland (and so on, can give 100 examples). Internet literature would say that the Internet is easier for the dissemination of literature, and the proportion of people who get their knowledge and news from the Internet is now higher than from books. More people involved means more vitality, more exploration and research in literature.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------

Debating takes skill. The basic skill is that you set up a few key arguments and list a lot of arguments for those arguments to prove them. When debating on both sides, everyone relies on the arguments they have prepared. All you have to do is keep making your own arguments over and over again and then proving them in order to make your point justifiable and reasonable (that way, the panel of judges will know how your side is arguing its point, and you won't lose, at least.) Then refute the points made by the other side, as well as the conflicting arguments of the other side and your own, (by means of counter-evidence, contradiction, etc.) to weaken the credibility of the other side's arguments, and in turn, to strengthen your own arguments. As long as the material is well-prepared, the information on both sides is much the same.

Let's say that online literature is more favorable to the development of literature.

Arguments:

1. The Internet allows more people to read literature

2. The Internet allows more people to participate in the creation of literature

3. The clash of cultures on the Internet is more intense, and in such an environment it is possible to cultivate good literature, which is conducive to the development of literature

The rest of the work is just to keep looking for information online and watching the video screens of other people's debates. information, watch other people's debate video screen; and then in the clinical time firmly believe that they will win ！！！！