Ying Zheng and Evonne were misunderstood by the audience's traditional ideas. Why?

"Dafuqin" ushered in the grand finale of Qin Wang dominating the whole country, and this highly discussed drama finally ended with 5.9 points. From the original broadcast of 9.0 to 5.9, many viewers said "I can't stand it" and "decisively give up the play" when I saw half of it. Does this mean that Dafuqin is a "bad play"? In fact, it is not necessarily that the plot is not good, but that the audience should reflect on it themselves.

Ying Zheng, who was misunderstood by traditional ideas, said that the first hot topic of Dafuqin must be that Empress Huayang deliberately made actresses imitate Evonne and humiliate Evonne. Ying Zheng drew his sword and beheaded the actress on the spot. Huayang imprisoned Ying Zheng and Evonne and staged a coup. Later, Huayang broke up and said that Ying Zheng was the son of Lv Buwei. So there is the following famous scene: when Ying Zheng escaped, he asked like a madman: "If you are really my father, I would like to leave Qin and wander around with you, and I don't want to be an animal who doesn't even know who my father is."

The audience began to vomit when they saw this. What is this king of Qin? As a person who wants to dominate the world in the future, how can he cry so unscrupulously? This is also the beginning of the decline in the reputation of Daqin House. But audience, you are thinking deeply about the situation of the king of Qin. Isn't it unreasonable for a screenwriter to write like this?

Although the King of Qin was a native of Qin, he was forced to leave his hometown at an early age. His mother is from Zhao as well. He lives in Zhao and Zhao himself. When he was a child, he witnessed that his father would rather give up himself and his mother for the land. How can his thoughts have no shadow? Why didn't he have doubts when he heard such rumors?

Perhaps at this time, some people say that people who achieve great things should learn to bear the burden of humiliation. How could a great king like Qin do such a stupid thing? But people don't look at how old Ying Zheng is in the plot! He is only 14 years old. 14-year-old children, even if they have more knowledge, have not reached real psychological maturity. Studies in modern times show that 14 years old is in physiological adolescence, and its most prominent feature is that it has certain rebellious performance, and it will be particularly sensitive and self-conscious. Ying Zheng was born without a father's love and has been wandering outside for many years. 14 years old, isn't it normal for him to be impulsive when he encounters such a thing?

Ladies and gentlemen, when you are 14 years old, what kind of mood is very clear? If you encounter the same experience as Ying Zheng, you will deal with it calmly and there will be no collapse. The screenwriter of this play just shows the soft side of the emperor's heart. I believe that no matter how tough people are, they will also have a soft side. The screenwriter just shows this side of the emperor to everyone, so that when analyzing historical figures, we should not always interpret him with traditional inertial thinking, and should not always think that the emperor should be domineering and cruel. So what's unreasonable about this scene? Besides, Qin Huang's identity is controversial in history, and it is wise for writers to deal with it in a vague way.

There is another episode in Evonne's scandal, that is, the scandal of Zhao Ji and Lao Ai, who have already become the Queen Mother. As soon as this emotional line appeared, the audience vomited that the scenes written by these screenwriters were not big, allowing an open queen mother to have an affair in her own palace? I also gave birth to a child, giving people a feeling of "destroying the three views."

But a closer look shows that the screenwriter only wrote the role of Empress Dowager Cixi from a different angle, getting rid of the venerable image of Empress Dowager Cixi, but she wrote about a woman, and women always have secular desires. Look at Evonne. Life is poor, too. She used to be the daughter of Zhao Fujia. She is a princess on high. She was originally Lv Buwei's concubine, but she was eventually abducted to Zi Chu by Lv Buwei. Soon after making friends with Zhao, he was imprisoned and unable to reunite with his husband, watching him abandon himself and his children. If you have this experience, who can bear it? Finally reunited with her husband's family, but her husband became king and had no time to get along with her. Her husband is sad for politics every day, and she will be sad in her heart, so she has her classic sentence: "Once a man becomes a king, he will be unhappy."

A man who becomes a king will lose the happiness of many ordinary people, because he shoulders a great responsibility, and there are thousands of Qian Qian people's lives behind him. At the same time, he should also prevent some courtiers from usurping the throne, and even they may not be able to trust a person completely in their hearts. This kind of pressure is much more than modern people. As a woman, Evonne must be eager for her husband's love, especially when they meet again after many years. Her desire for love must be stronger. However, Zi Chu died young without giving her much love, making her a widow in her thirties.

Being a widow in her thirties is nothing strange in modern times. People always have needs. And because Evonne experienced man's betrayal and her husband's early death, Evonne's feelings with Lao Ai didn't break away from the clearing, and her heart longed for love. Her mistake is that she is too self-centered and fails to fulfill her responsibilities as the empress dowager. But it is also reasonable for the screenwriter to arrange the plot like this. She just showed the back of the Queen Mother. Why can't the audience accept it? Is it correct to write according to the traditional "vicious" queen mother? And this passage about Evonne and Ai is indeed recorded in history. Did the audience blame the screenwriter wrong?

The sidewalk and the scenery About the drama Dafuqin, some people even complain that the scenes in the TV series are too clean. What kind of confusing remarks is this?

The costumes and scenery in Daqin Mansion are beyond the reach of many costume dramas. First of all, from the big background, the powerful crossbow, Zhao's unparalleled cavalry, and the ultimate Zhong Shan in the middle and late Qi Dynasty are all reflected in the play. Secondly, from the perspective of overall service, it is very close to history. Qin Jun is almost similar to the Terracotta Warriors, and it can be seen that every detail is very attentive.

With the hit drama "Legend of Fei", exaggerated special effects and broadcast gymnastics-like martial arts, it can be seen that "Da Qin Fu" is a work of heart.

Conclusion Generally speaking, the production of Ode to Daqin is not the so-called "bad drama" in everyone's mouth. As the director said, Ode to Daqin is not Qiong Yao's kung fu drama. Whether it is handled to cater to the tastes and hobbies of the current audience has nothing to do with this, but according to the process and results recorded in history, we have constructed a more reasonable story logic, and we need such story logic. "

The audience's taste may be to see how Ying Zheng dominated the world, but this drama broke the traditional thinking and showed the emperor's soft side more often. In fact, this can make people understand this historical figure more stereoscopically. Ying Zheng's life story is inherently vague. For example, Biographies of Lv Buwei and Biographies of Qin Shihuang in Historical Records contradict each other, so it is not impossible for this drama to be handled in a vague way. But it is precisely because of this that he is inconsistent with the traditional concept of the audience. In the traditional concept, everyone thinks that the king of Qin is domineering, and the queen mother should have a plan, so there is a spit.

In addition, the audience has been poisoned by many fast food cultures. Many people like to watch the scripts of overbearing presidents or emperors, and this 70-episode Dafuqin makes the audience feel procrastinating? So should the audience reflect on their need to slow down to understand this TV series and change their thinking to accept the innovation of the screenwriter? Therefore, it may not be the writer's problem that Dafuqin got such ratings, but that it didn't cater to the audience's interest. Should the audience reflect?