Write an essay on a movie

1. Write a 600-word essay on one of my favorite movies. 2012 Movie Introduction: The scene is huge and the plot is rough. Core tip: But in the end, this is just a disaster movie. It is essentially nothing like the comet hitting the earth that I watched when I was a kid.

the difference.

In other words, this film just borrows the shell of 2012, and is essentially an old-fashioned disaster film.

2012 movie introduction: plot synopsis 2012 movie introduction: first-rate scenes, second-rate plot, plus embarrassing humanity. It is indeed not easy to bring down the world in a movie.

So I thought about it for a long time and felt that although the plot was very low, but for the big scenes, I gave it four stars.

The big scenes are nothing to say, landslides and ground cracks, fireballs falling from the sky, floods engulfing the land, the tall buildings and natural landscapes familiar to the world are all wiped out, there is a sense of fear and excitement when playing games.

If the end of the world is really coming, what are the little things we usually think about?

The building where the money was piled up disappeared in a second, and countless tiny human particles were blown away and torn apart. We are too fragile and insignificant!

But in the final analysis, this is just a disaster movie, essentially no different from the comet hitting the earth that I watched when I was a kid.

In other words, this film just borrows the shell of 2012, and is essentially an old-fashioned disaster film.

There is no suspense, no surprises, only survival that makes people visually tired, and the embarrassing humanitarian spirit in the face of impending disaster.

The techniques for escaping are racing cars and flying airplanes, which always feel familiar and a little less creative.

The only technical aspect is the emphasis on the voice control system of the big Bentley.

As for those arks, apart from being big, they were still big and not very interesting.

To be honest, the plot and character settings are a bit unflattering.

First of all, there is the hippie who exposed half of his naked body before he died. The little old man broadcast 2012 every day. According to the photo, the relevant insiders were assassinated, so why has he been okay all this time?

Even if you don’t kill him for being a lunatic, you should at least ban the blog and expel him from Yellowstone Park!

It was a bit strange that he was still reporting there even though the army had come in.

The identity of the protagonist is also a bit puzzling. The frustrated writer drives a car for a Russian rich man?

Rich people usually have regular drivers, so why would they care about an unreliable writer?

The protagonist and his family went to Yellowstone Park to play and entered a restricted area. Why would a great geologist ask them?

I can't figure it out, it's strange.

Arranging for the two to get to know each other in such a far-fetched way actually lowers the level of screenwriting for blockbusters.

The President of the United States has once again been portrayed as a hero for the people, and there is also a selfish commander and a kind-hearted young scholar with surging passion, which is quite boring.

The pace of the film is not very tight. Basically, you are waiting for the big scenes and have little expectations for the plot.

Especially towards the end, I spent a long time working on a gate, which made me anxious and angry.

However, the film shows the absolute rise of Asia and Africa, the positive appearance of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, the Indian scholars who realize that the end is coming, and Africa has also become the world's highest point after the catastrophe.

The people who bought the space on the ship were also wealthy people from Russia and Saudi Arabia, and they spent billions of euros on it!

I really like the Russian tycoon Yuri, he acted so well!

In the film, his emotional portrayal is relatively complete and rich.

At the end of the world, it is China that has taken up the banner of saving mankind. This is the direction of the world!

Besides, the Chinese market is so big. When I watched it yesterday, the venue was almost full. It’s really unjustifiable not to include some Chinese elements.

It's a pity that few foreigners have a true understanding of Eastern culture, and they always deceive people with a few Zen stories.

The story about the tea cup has been worn out. This time, the soup is replaced without the medicine, and the story about Zen Buddhism is put on the head of the lama. Does this mean that the knowledge of foreigners is shallow?

Or is it shallow?

I used to talk about 2012, but most people thought it was nonsense. Wasn't there also an end of the world in 1999?

Nothing happened!

But the meaning of 2012 is different. Mysterious prophecy, religion and science finally merged into one, and unanimously set the end of the world to December 21, 2012.

Go check it out on the Internet. You will be able to read all kinds of true and false opinions for a week, and you can write a lot of novels. It's so fun.

In fact, starting from last year, I would search for information about 2012 when I was free, joined many related Douban groups, and even stayed up in the middle of the night watching it.

There is only one statement that I can agree with, and that is that 2012 is not the end, but a node.

Humanity has reached a crossroads, where so-called development has destroyed the earth and drowned spirituality, and we need a rebirth.

In comparison, "Knowing", which was released in China at the same time, is much more interesting.

It is exactly the same as the reason for the demise of the earth explained in the 2012 Chinese New Year, which is that solar activity detonated neutrinos.

However, although the screenwriter of "Mysterious Code" also has loopholes, he added elements of suspense and thriller, and the technical content is much higher.

More importantly, the meaning of "Mysterious Code" is more open, looking at the universe, and being more calm and free about the end of the world.