China's "imperial dynasty" and Britain's "royal family"

Dynasty probably refers to dynasties, such as Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing. Britain also has dynasties, such as house of hanover, Plantagenet and Tudor. Now it's the Windsor Dynasty, but we are emperors. They are called kings, so there are "emperors" and "kings". Dynasty or dynasty is the continuation of family rule, so we can probably think of the same surname. For example, the Windsor Dynasty in Britain is now called Windsor, our emperor of the Tang Dynasty. Moreover, to be precise, the British monarchy should not use "emperor" at present, but only "king". Britain's "emperor" came from India's "emperor" position only once, and now there is no more, only Britain's own "king" position.

As for the British royal family, it still exists because of the national characteristics of Britain. Whether it is the constitution, democracy, revolution, industrialization, or the lifestyle of modern society, many of them were initiated by Britain, but they only created it and stopped further development and transformation, so that in many aspects, he was the first, but often not the most advanced and thorough. Therefore, they basically stopped their revolution and democracy almost stopped. So now let's look at Britain. They are all modern, but they look a little older than any other country. They change half of everything and keep half, unlike us who tear down all the old ones with one order.

Some people are against the royal family because it is always a symbol of inequality, and the royal family spends a lot of money.