China traditional sword

Conclusion: The book A Record of Taikang puts forward the wrong order of swords, with some place names as the names of swords and the sword of the king of Chu as the sword of Hanwang. Nine swords are not ranked correctly and do not exist. Tae Ah and General Mo Xie also have nothing to do with South Korea.

"Bill Han has many swords, one is Tangxi, the other is Yang Mo, the third is Hebo, the fourth is Deng Shi, the fifth is Feng Wan, the sixth is Longquan, the seventh is Taiya, the eighth is Mo Xie, and the ninth is Ganjiang." From historical records? Su Qin Biography and Tai Kangdi Ji said that "there are many swords of Bill Han in the world", including Longquan, Artest, Mo Xie and Ganjiang. Not historical records? The Biography of Su Qin itself.

"Historical Records" Su Qin once said: "The swords, spears and halberds of the Han Dynasty all came from famous mountains, Tangxi, Yang Mo, Hebo, Deng Shi, Feng Wan and Tai 'an, all of which were broken by land and waterways, and when the enemy was defeated ..."

"Tai Kang Di Zhi" says: There is Longquan water in the west, which can quench the sword with great strength, so there is Longquan sword-the sword of Chu. There is another saying, "There are many swords in Bill Han, one is Tangxi, the other is Yang Mo, the third is Hebo, the fourth is Deng Shi, the fifth is Feng Wan, the sixth is Longquan, the seventh is Tai 'an and the eighth is Mo Xie. Their swords are all from Xiping County. "

Look, the key is to break sentences. Su Qin that sentence, a * * * made seven names. Which of them are place names and which are sword names? Because there are no punctuation marks in the historical records, some people think that the six names after the famous mountains are all swords. I think they are all place names. From the perspective of language structure, the two "Dus" inherited the word "halberd" in front, and there can be no sword name in the middle, so there is something wrong with this sentence. Su Qin can't even say a word, so what is a strategist? In a word, the busybodies added six place names, including Longquan, Ganjiang and Mo Xie, making nine. Plus the first ghost mountain, it is enough for ten famous swords. However, Yuejueshu said that the three swords of Longyuan, Taiya and Kampot were all built by Ou Yezi and his generals for King Hui of Chu. Long Yuanhe was mentioned in the Book of Jin Zhang Huazhi, and they fought fiercely. They thought that the alias of these two swords was Ganjiang He, and these four swords were actually the same sword. Then the two swords turned into male and female dragons and left. In the Tang Dynasty, in order to avoid (Tang Gaozu Li Yuan), Longyuan in all books was changed to Longquan.

Tangxi was the territory of Chu in the Spring and Autumn Period. During the Warring States Period, the State of Chu lost Tangxi, which was acquired by South Korea. Chu annexed the land of wuyue and drove the descendants of Yue to Fujian. Tai 'a and other swords were born in the Spring and Autumn Period, when Tangxi belonged to the State of Chu. Su Qin, a Warring States person, was right to say that Tangxi in South Korea is rich in swords, because three famous swords were indeed born in history. But it has nothing to do with Korea. If China now occupies Hawaii, it is certainly right to say that Hawaii in China was attacked by Japan, but it cannot be said that Hawaii fought back against Japan under the rule of China. Because the Hawaiian counterattack against Japan is under the rule of the United States and has nothing to do with China.

It's hard to prove whether Lieutenant Mo Xie is too arrogant. Cao Pi's "Artemisia": "Wu Zhijun, the step of light, the Longquan of Chu, the North Korea. The collar of Miaoshan. Yangtou Steel is a famous former generation. Salty taste calls itself beauty, beauty. I am not as good as Jun Liangjian. " No mention of Mo Xie. Xunzi's Theory of Evil Nature: "General He Lv, Mo Xie, Juque, Bilu, etc. are all good ancient swords." He Lv, prince of Wu, said. As for the origin of Mo Xie's two swords, now the whole country knows that the King of Chu killed the sword and then avenged his brow. In fact, there are several versions of Mo Xie, a senior general. In different ancient books, it is mentioned that they were killed by He Lv, Chu, Wei Huiwang, Jin Army and Han Wangzao, which spanned from the Spring and Autumn Period to the Warring States Period and involved five countries geographically. It's hard to tell true from false. However, a large number of works such as Wu Yue Chun Qiu and Sou Shen Ji adopted the view of the King of Chu, so the King of Chu dominated the group and became the person whose head was cut off because of the cadre Mo Xie. But we know that there is no mention in the history books of any king of Chu who was beheaded for casting a sword, so this legend should be regarded as a story. However, even in legend, the final conclusion of Mo Xie, a senior general, is the sword of Chu. It has nothing to do with Korea.

Conclusion: The book A Record of Taikang puts forward the wrong order of swords, with some place names as the names of swords and the sword of the king of Chu as the sword of Hanwang. The ranking of these nine swords is wrong and does not exist, and the three swords of Tai 'a have nothing to do with South Korea. Some nosy YY sounds like South Korea, and everything is yours.