Writing a message on the topic of debate

1. Write a message on the topic of debate

Introduction: on August 27, Luo Yonghao and Wang Ziru appeared as promised to confront each other on the spot in response to the previous cell phone video review.

The entire debate lasted more than three hours, but the rules and etiquette of the debate were quite controversial. In fact, the Chinese people's understanding of the rules of debate only stays in the "college debate", thinking that is the normal debate etiquette, but in fact, this is not the case.

Sixty seconds to read the feature: Chinese people's knowledge of the debate format is limited to the Chinese debate system, but not all debate modes are "to the point", in the United States, there is a one-sided debate format, in the specified time, the two sides have to interact with the questioning, and each other to refute. The debate between Luo Yonghao and Wang Ziru was poor, and the fault lies with the organizers.

Debate without rules is no different from arguing. Chinese people's knowledge of the form of debate from the international college debate, that all debates should follow the "to the point" rules of debate Chinese people's knowledge of the form of debate mainly from the traditional Singapore four-person system of value-based debates, from the Singapore International College Debating Championships in 1993, the debate has been a high-end intellectual competition form of television screen. The format has been on TV since the Singapore International Collegiate Debate in 1993 as a high-end intellectual competition.

After the triumph of the Fudan Debate Team in the Lion City in 1993, the "Singapore Debate System" was pushed to its "peak" in China. The Singapore system is divided into two parts: the presentation and the free debate.

Three debaters from both sides will make their speeches in 3 minutes, and then, after that, they will enter into a free debate, and then the four debaters from both sides will summarize their speeches, which is also to the point.

Debate more than one rule, the U.S. college debates have a "single" mode, the two sides of the "interactive questioning", take turns to state and rebuttal and a single domestic debate system is different, there are a variety of forms of foreign debate system, the United States is the most common is the Oregon system (Oregon). Oregon system (Oregon Style Debate), originated in 1924 in the United States, Oregon State University, with reference to the United Kingdom and the United States and other countries in the court of debate mode, the development of an "interactive questioning" type of debate system, so that the positive and negative sides can be more fully reached face to face communication purposes. 1952 formalized for the U.S. "In 1952, it was formally adopted by the National Forentic League, and has been widely publicized in Europe and the United States.

U.S. college debates generally take five modes, including cross-questioning debates, Lincoln-Douglas system, moot court debates, town hall debates and parliamentary debates. Among them, the Lincoln-Douglas debate is a debate model named after U.S. presidential candidates Abraham Lincoln and Abraham Douglas, a one-on-one two-player competition, which can be roughly regarded as the Oregon system with only one debater.

Simply put, it is a two-person "one-on-one" competition, taking turns to present and rebut. In addition to this, the parliamentary debate system, which is modeled after the British Parliament, also has a special rule of "questioning": Point of Information ("PoI").

The opponent is allowed to ask questions at any time during "unprotected time" (other than the first and last minute). The party presenting the point may accept or reject the question.

A normal debate cannot be separated from a reasonable set of procedures. In American debates, there is a moderator who acts as a referee and controls the scene, making sure that both sides have the opportunity to express their views on an equal footing rather than attacking each other.

In the debate, if there is a personal attack, avoiding questions and other violations, the other side can immediately stand up to the judges to put forward the "Point of Order" (Point of Order), the jury referee "established" (well) or "not taken" (well), and the other side can immediately stand up to the judges to put forward the "Point of Order" (Point of Order). The jury decides whether it is "well taken" or "not well taken", and if it is well taken, points will be deducted. This procedure is Robert's Rules of Order on Points of Order.

Such a mechanism ensures that both sides have an equal opportunity to express their views (rather than attacking each other), creates a deterrent to violating the rules, and provides a simple, decent, and orderly process for individuals to assert their rights and have the rules enforced. Contrast this with Chinese debates, where the only choices are to tolerate insults and raise a ruckus in the face of rule-breaking behavior.

Luo Yonghao grabbed the words is not unqualified, "grab the words, interrupting" is the "one-upmanship" debate in the habit and strategy, if the organizers stay moderator control will be better in the three hours after the live broadcast, most of the comments are in the blame! "Luo Yonghao interrupts, snatch words, no quality", but in fact, Luo Wang debate belongs to the "single challenge", the original two sides should question each other, rebuttal. The two said together, Luo Yonghao grabbing words is not called uneducated, Wang Ziru is not not want to grab, just most of the time to grab but.

A debate into a "street scolding" is precisely because the organizers of the dereliction of duty, the rules of the debate set unreasonable, the lack of moderator, the lack of control of the field (so that the two sides to express their views fluently) control. As self media person @Appendix said, the debate skills are very useful for the argument, but that is also based on the debate scene: there should be clearly informed rules (such as fair length of speeches, time allocation, etc.), there should be a good moderator to control the scene (responsible for ruling on the behavior of breaking the rules), and there should be a gradual setup of the argument (the arguments must be maintained without dispersion). None of the basic facilities are prepared.

In contrast, in the U.S. televised presidential election debates, the rules of debate are very detailed, and the 2004 Bush-Kerry televised debate even required room temperature and lighting, and the order of speeches was determined by the moderator's coin toss. The 32-page memorandum of understanding that resulted from weeks of urgent negotiations between US presidential candidates George W. Bush and John Kerry over the rules for the presidential debates in 2004, laid out almost all the details, including a "sweating clause". The Democrats demanded that the room temperature be kept at 21 degrees Celsius for fear that Kerry would sweat, and the **** and the party wanted the backlighting not to be too bright for fear that Bush would be dwarfed by the taller Kerry.

The requirements for the moderator were also detailed, and a coin toss was used to determine who would speak first. The selection of the audience was based on the principle that it would be largely open to a roughly equal number of voters who favored each side and who had not yet made up their minds.

The U.S. election TV debate, interrupt each other is a common strategy, 2012 Obama and Romney's second televised debate, the two sides frequently interrupted each other to speak, flat.

2. To "remember a debate" as the theme of writing an essay

People often say: "open the book is beneficial." But some people say: "open book may not be beneficial." So, today we have a unique debate on the question of whether it is beneficial to open the book. The positive side's point of view is that it is beneficial to open a book, and the negative side's point of view is that it may not be beneficial to open a book. I am the main debater of the opposite side.

At the beginning of the debate, the positive side of the old Xu preemptively said: "I think it is beneficial to open the book, we go to school every day, every day to read extracurricular books, are not all that open the book is beneficial to come to school to receive knowledge?"

Lao Xu's words did not put us on the opposite side of the town, I calmly said: "There are two kinds of books, beneficial and non-beneficial, we go to school to read the books are good for us physically and mentally, but there are also some books out there that are not beneficial to us, do you also read? Some people say that a bad book is like a devil, reading it will defile the pure and fertile soil of your mind. As soon as my words fell, our party applauded.

"The ancients have a saying, 'There is a golden house in a book, there is a face like jade in a book', books are all treasures, why do you say books are not beneficial?" Positive Xiao Zhao is also not willing to show weakness.

At this point, the opposite side was silent. Fortunately, the resourceful Quan Quan timely help. She said, "Ancient is ancient, modern is modern, how can this be compared? Now there are so many yellow books and magazines on the market, what if we read and imitate indiscriminately?"

We are arguing in the face of the time, the teacher as a "peacemaker". She said: "open the book is certainly beneficial, but the book to have a choice to see, or else on their own is harmful."

Through this debate, we not only exercise eloquence, but also know that everything should be seen in two, this debate can be said to be a lot of harvest.

3. Write a 700-word essay on the topic of fierce debate

On Friday afternoon, our class held a wonderful debate, which benefited me a lot, and I understood the real meaning of "open the book".

As soon as the bell rang, Ms. Guo walked up the stairs with a big step, and she was very confident about the debate. When Ms. Guo walked into the classroom door when the footsteps slowed down, she scanned the classroom, see the students are talking, the face of the smile immediately disappeared, became serious. The students suddenly realized that something was wrong and stopped immediately. Ms. Guo saw the classroom quieted down and instructed the students to set up the field of play, then walked to the podium and said, "After a week of preparation, I believe that we are all confident, this game will be very successful." Then picked up the chalk over the body, on the blackboard a few strokes wrote "debate - open book benefit". She announced the rules of the competition, the first designated debate, the second free debate, and then exchange both sides of the point of view for another debate. A command, in the applause of the students to participate in the contestants on the field, they all stand tall, holding a thick material. On the left side sat the girls' team, who were the opposite side; on the right side sat the boys' team. They were the positive side. After a while of preparation, the debate began. First the positive side spoke. "Our side thinks that opening books is beneficial, and only by reading more can knowledge be enriched." "Our side thinks that opening books is not beneficial, there are some loopholes in the management nowadays, and some unhealthy books are very unfavorable to us after reading them." The best is still Pan*'s sentence, "May I ask the other side of the defense, do you love reading books?" "Love!" "Oh, then you must have read very hard to get your eyes nearsighted." "Hahaha" the classmates laughed loudly, and applauded Pan Tian one after another. Hu ** only then realized that he was fooled, busy explaining: "Hey, really ashamed ah, in fact, I am playing computer eyes only myopia." After half a lesson of "war of words", the teacher announced that the two sides exchanged views. The boys' team became the opposite side and the girls' team became the positive side. "We think it's good to open a book, because reading more can broaden your horizons, and at the same time it's helpful to learn from the textbook, isn't it the best of both worlds?" "Our side thinks that opening a book is not beneficial, some elementary school students they often go to some small bookstalls to buy books, due to the lack of discernment to buy unhealthy books, read them and then go to imitate them, on the road of no return." At this point, the two sides are arguing, and no one can convince anyone. The audience is even more emotional, all can not wait, the expression has been changing, a moment of happy hands and feet, a moment to stare at the contestants on stage, for the contestants pinched a sweat, really more nervous than the contestants ......

Finally, with the teacher's order to end the debate, the contestants withdrew! The first thing you need to do is to get rid of all the stuff you've been doing. The audience is still a little unfulfilled, if it is not because of the relationship between time, do not know to argue until when it!

This game allows us to exercise eloquence, show their own advantages, and increase knowledge, it is really a fierce and wonderful debate!

4. To write a 700-word essay on the topic of a heated debate

Editor's note: This is an evenly matched debate, the debate on whether opening a book is beneficial to the theme of a heated debate, the debate, so that the author understands that reading is very important.

Today, we are ready to hold a debate, the theme of the debate is: whether the open book is beneficial! Classes, see the teacher put us in accordance with the positive and negative parties sitting on both sides, suddenly felt the smoke filled the air! The "battle" started, the positive side of the defense took the lead to show their own point of view: "books are the ladder of progress of mankind, books have their own golden house, books have their own Yan Ruyu, these familiar proverbs are enough to show that reading is beneficial." Our defense partner, the opposite side, then elaborated our point of view: "Liu Xiang in the Han Dynasty once said, 'Books are like medicine.

'Since books are medicines, they have two functions, one is a good medicine and the other is a poison, a good medicine can cure the disease, and a poison can put a person in a dead place." Both sides of the debaters have stated their views, and the audience listened with great interest.

At this point, the defense told a reality: "I once saw a news story about a boy who got carried away reading martial arts novels and thought he could fly, so he 'flew' down from the window and fell to his death. All these cases show that books may not always be beneficial."

The positive side again lit up the point: "Read a thousand books, the pen is like a god, that is to say, only to read a lot of books, can enrich the inner, can grow knowledge." The opposite side immediately rebutted: "'Read a lot of books' are not all beneficial, some youth idols, martial arts, comics and other books, rendering violence and other unhealthy things, we are purely harmless, because we do not have strong self-control, can not withstand the temptation, easy to believe, will taint our pure heart. ."

Positive and negative debate is not divided, however, through this debate, I understand, although most of the books are good, but "the tree has dead branches", there is always a bad in which we have to be selective to read, to learn to take the essence, to remove the dross, so that we can do the true "Open the book is beneficial." .

5. How to write an essay on the debate

The bell ~~~~~~" ringing, a debate on the "open book is beneficial" began in a tense, intense atmosphere.

When I stood up, my heart wanted to put a small rabbit, seven jumps and eight jumps. I started: "In this world of information technology, reading is one of the main ways for us to acquire knowledge.

Reading more can broaden our knowledge and enrich our literary cultivation, which will help us a lot in speaking and writing in the future." The other side of Chen Xiaoying aggressively said: "The ancient saying: "open the book is beneficial."

Indeed, this we can not deny. However, in the modern world, we have ** the ancient saying that "opening a book is beneficial", because we believe that "opening a book may not be beneficial".

Of course, "open book may not be beneficial" this statement does not mean that more reading is not beneficial, but that more reading of those unhealthy books will have an impact on the body and mind, there is no benefit. When you read more of those unhealthy books, your poisoning will become deeper and deeper, which will lead you to fall, fall into the abyss, and never have the opportunity to turn around, that is a how tragic fate ah! When she finished, everyone remembered to applaud, only to see some nodding and some whispering.

I was not to be outdone: "For a good book is beneficial, that everyone understands. So the argument is: does the so-called bad book have some benefits of its own? The benefits of reading can be so great that they can lead a person to great enlightenment, to change his ways, to a brighter path, to success; they can be so small that he can learn a few ways of writing, a few words, or even recognize a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which cannot be denied. Therefore, no matter how bad it is, in the so-called bad book at least can learn some writing methods, and even recognize a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?" Chen Xiaoying added, "What if many teenagers read books they shouldn't and go on to commit crimes?" Chen Kaishan from our group immediately stood up and said, "The youths who commit crimes on TV are all caused by going to Internet cafes and other places to play games instead of reading books! The other party was dumbfounded and speechless.

Chen Xiaoying and I argued you a word and I a sentence, we can add to add, looking for information to find information, and finally the teacher asked us to summarize. I said: "Books are the friends of mankind!" Chen Xiaoying said, "Some books can cause damage to people!!!" Although this debate we discerned difficult to distinguish, not divided, but let me know that books must be selective, to look at the books, to eliminate bad books, future service to the motherland!

6. how to write an essay on the debate

bell ~~~~~~ "The clear bell rang, a debate on the "open book is beneficial" in a tense, heated atmosphere began. When I stood up, my heart wanted to carry a small rabbit, seven jumps and eight jumps. I made a preemptive strike: "In this information-based world, reading is one of the main ways for us to acquire knowledge. Reading more can broaden our knowledge and enrich our literary cultivation, which will help us a lot in speaking and writing in the future." The other party, Chen Xiaoying, said aggressively, "The ancient saying goes, "Opening a book is beneficial." Indeed, this we cannot deny. However, in modern society, we have ** the ancient saying that "opening a book is beneficial", because we believe that "opening a book may not be beneficial". Of course, the expression "opening a book may not be beneficial" does not mean that reading more books is not beneficial, but that reading more unhealthy books will affect the body and mind, and will not be beneficial. When you read more of those unhealthy books, your poisoning will become deeper and deeper, which will lead you to fall, fall into the abyss, and never have a chance to turn around, that is a how miserable fate ah!

After she finished, everyone remembered the applause, only to see some people nodding, some whispering. I was not to be outdone: "For good books are beneficial, this everyone understands . So the argument is: does the so-called bad book have its own benefits? The benefits of reading can be so great that they can lead a person to great enlightenment, to change his ways, to a brighter path, to success; they can be so small that he can learn a few ways of writing, a few words, or even recognize a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which cannot be denied. Therefore, no matter how bad it is, in the so-called bad book at least can learn some writing methods, and even recognize a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?" Chen Xiaoying added, "What if many teenagers read books they shouldn't and go on to commit crimes?" Chen Kaishan from our group immediately stood up and said, "The youths who commit crimes on TV are all caused by going to Internet cafes and other places to play games instead of reading books! The other party was dumbfounded and speechless.

Chen Xiaoying and I argued you a word and I a sentence, we can add to add, looking for information to find information, and finally the teacher asked us to summarize. I said: "Books are the friends of mankind!" Chen Xiaoying said: "Some books can get people damaged!!!"

Although the debate we discerned difficult to distinguish between the two, but let me know that the book must have a choice, to look at the book, to eliminate bad books, future service to the motherland!

7. to debate the form of writing the essay is not argumentative

class, today finally looked forward to our long-awaited debate, positive and negative sides, divided into the north and south of the two rows of six people each, in the podium around the formation. To "open the book is beneficial" as the topic, just listen to the host of a command, at this time the positive side of the team as a few standby soldiers, all eager to try as if the order is issued, will immediately rush to the battlefield. And then look at the opposite side of the valor, high momentum, they seem to have a plan. The first thing you need to do is to look at the other side of the coin and see who is going to be the best.

The debate began, the positive side to pre-emptive strategy to seize the first opportunity, only to see the positive side of the team members smiled a little. But the first shot of the opposite side is not bad, our team in the form of celebrity quotes to resist the opponent's powerful offense.

Just see the audience wide-eyed, our little rabbit heart thumping, thinking: no, the other side has a "masterpiece" positive side said: "books are like medicine, good reading can heal the stupid". Unexpectedly, the opponent also used the same way, shot back a bullet, both sides of the bullets collided together, grinding out the wisdom of the sparks, which sparks make me light up, I retorted to the "medicine is three times poisonous, books are no exception. The people in favor of the opposite side applauded, and the positive side still did not have a trace of fear, which is puzzling to me.

The positive side finally came out of the trump card, which can be bad, our army morale fell, support for positive and negative students shouted, "Good! Good! Good!" Positive personnel are three words to demoralize our army. Our team also gave them a blow, this blow is really beautiful, the positive side is no longer so excited, but the positive side still said the words: "read a million volumes, the next pen as God". Our counter-argument was "Reading thousands of books is not as good as traveling thousands of miles". The other side of the players from the passive gradually into active, support for the opposite side of the students once again, and even some of the cardboard to write out "the opposite side of the must win" a few words.

The next class, or not divided into winners and losers, but I understand a truth: in fact, the combination of positive and negative views of the two sides is a perfect point of view, the future I must read more, read good books.

8. Debate essay how to write

Monday afternoon, our class around the "open book benefit" or "open book may not be beneficial" this issue launched a debate.

"Bell, bell, bell," the crisp class bell rang, the students are all fist, eager to try, take a piece of information, back to the seat. At the teacher's command, the debate began. First of all, it is the positive side of me to state the point of view: "Our point of view is that opening a book is beneficial, there are many famous people 、、、、、、 are 、、、、、、 successful because of reading." As I was the first to say, there is no preparation, so the other side easily refuted: "I think not any books are beneficial, if we read those unhealthy books, not only will not gain, but will tarnish our mind that a piece of pure fertile ground. There is a book called "My Dream", which makes many teenagers 、、、、、、 Therefore, our side's view is that opening a book may not be beneficial!" The opposing side was so vigorous that we were stupid, and I was as anxious as an ant on a hot pan. At this time, Xiaodan stood up and expressed his own viewpoint: surprisingly, you say that it is a bad book, you can not go to see ah! I immediately stood up and added: "Does the so-called bad book have its own benefits? In terms of the benefits of reading, the big can be so big as to make people realize, change their wrongs, to the bright road, success; small can be as small as to learn a few writing techniques, a few words, and even know a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which cannot be denied. Therefore, in the so-called bad books can at least learn some writing techniques, and even less can recognize a few words. Can this be said to be unprofitable?" My fluency seemed to have rendered the opposite side speechless. There was only a five-second lull, at which point Chao from the opposite side chestily said, "So what if you know a few words, they've gone off the deep end." The students on the opposite side applauded in support, and I was anxious, thinking, "Oh no, what should I do? I turned my head and said excitedly to our classmates, "Hey, didn't you guys collect? Come on! They're outnumbered." At the teacher's prompting, Xiao Long smugly read the information and countered with a long list of stories about celebrities who read. The opposite side did not suppress our reasoning tools. With a calm demeanor, Winnie from the other side pulled away, "There's a comic book called Crayola that has a lot of foul language in it, and it's something that can teach us bad things."

I was prepared for this question, and I gave a strong "cough" before saying, "Cartoon comics can increase the sense of art, martial arts novels can cultivate people's sense of justice, and which Chinese celebrities don't love to read? Besides, reading is a matter of mindset, a good mindset to read any book is not a problem." The last sentence, I deliberately dragged my voice, and because of the heavier, let the opposite side scared a little. My defense won the applause of the students.

"Bell, bell, bell" a *** broke the debate between the two sides, Mr. Chen commented on the views of the two sides, fully affirmed the wonderful performance of both sides. Then, the teacher emphasized: "Why did the students debate for so long or no result? Because there are two sides to everything, "open book is beneficial" is not wrong, "open book may not be beneficial" is also good. But we must clearly know, "open the book is beneficial" must open "benefit volume", take the essence. On this basis, the books, open eyes, improve our ability to appreciate, from the book to absorb nutrients, benefit from a lifetime."

Teacher's words, let me understand a lot: reading is the main way we get knowledge. Reading is to enrich ourselves, but only with the right guidance, we can benefit a lot.

9. to "debate" as the subject of writing an article of not less than 800 words

You can write a debate competition organized by the teacher.

For example: a unique debate One afternoon, the teacher said that tomorrow will be a debate on whether the Internet is beneficial. The teacher said that there would be a debate tomorrow about whether the Internet is good for us.

Early the next morning, I went back to school, all the way to the scenery looks particularly charming, the roadside wildflowers are blooming, the grass nodded to me. The birds were singing a beautiful song in the trees.

Seeing such a beautiful scenery, and thinking of the debate to be held, my mood is incomparably joyful. "Ding l00 ......" the class bell rang, the teacher walked into the classroom, said happily: "society due to the rapid development of technology, people use the computer e68a84e8a2ade799bee5baa6e79fa5e9819331333330323939, but is access to the Internet beneficial? Today we open a debate."

Said, on the blackboard wrote a few big words "whether the Internet is beneficial". And let our positive and negative side of the students gathered around to discuss.

After five minutes, the teacher said loudly: "The debate will now begin, please the students on the positive side first." The words just fell, our side of the small good chest stood up, said loudly: "I think the Internet can not only broaden their horizons, but also with the Internet users to pour out their hearts, to reduce pressure, why is not beneficial?" The first time I saw this, I was so happy to see you, and I'm so happy to see you.

Xiaotian immediately stood up, unhurriedly said: "Not everyone is a bad person, most people are good. And you can play games online and relax yourself!" The opposite side of the small flower quickly said, "Playing games on the Internet will make people addicted, and sitting in front of the computer for a long time is not good for your eyes, and it will also affect your study, and your memory will also decline."

...... We are not willing to show weakness, have put forward their own insights ...... Source: Finally, the teacher said in a serious tone: "In fact, every thing has two sides, there are good and bad, surfing the Internet is certainly no exception. However, there are more advantages than disadvantages of going online, and we should correctly utilize the positive effects of the Internet. "DINGZHOU ......" a clear bell ended this unique debate.

The students left the classroom with a smile on their faces. This debate is unforgettable to me, because I know that everyone should correctly utilize the network, improve their safety awareness, not addicted to online games, abide by national laws and regulations, and do not enter the business Internet cafes to consume.