How to evaluate Professor Chen Ping's remarks?

Chen Ping Inequality This is a very absurd sentence.

Chen Ping's inequality: 2,000 RMB under the China system is greater than 3,000 US dollars in the United States.

Mathematical expression: 2000 CNY| within the system > 3000 USD.

Exchange rate of RMB against USD: 1:7.

Subsidies within the system, such as 2 yuan can enjoy food in 30 yuan, the exchange rate ratio is 1: 15.

= "1cny | Within the system =" 1 CNY | = 2. 14 USD.

Draw a conclusion: 2000 CNY| In-system = 4280 USD >; Three thousand dollars.

Teacher Chen kept his mouth shut. Nobel Prize winners told me that all kinds of messy research offended researchers at home and abroad. In fact, anyone with a little academic knowledge knows where Mr. Chen's biggest knot is: he studied under the Nobel Prize winner, but he didn't get even a very bad teaching position in any American school; This is basically equivalent to denying a person academically.

I think many people still believe in Chen Ping. That's enough, isn't it? What can a person do with loess buried at the root of his neck? It is nothing more than spending some bad money to enrich your old age, and nothing else can be done.

Summarized as follows:

Teacher Chen's employees basically collapsed. The rest should only be iron powder, and the middle and high-end powder is basically gone.

Therefore, Chen Ping's personal design has never collapsed and he has never changed. I don't believe you took this idea to see his latest video responding to public opinion. Did you find that all his logic was smooth at once?