Advantages and disadvantages of risk management and control

1, lack of agility. In every market segment, there are many problems such as geography, culture, information resources and technical conditions. The ever-changing market requires the management structure of enterprises to be simplified, which is convenient for reorganization and adjustment, and it is difficult for large group organizations to respond promptly to this. Agility usually plays a vital role in enterprises. If the agility is not strong enough, the enterprise will be paralyzed and unable to arrange the things to be handled according to the original plan.

2. The core competence is not outstanding. This model is similar to the "vertical integration" model, forcing enterprises to allocate limited resources to multiple fields, making it difficult for enterprises to form economies of scale and core competitiveness.

3. It is easy to produce "information islands". Under the group organization mode, the communication between project departments is completed through the project headquarters, and they often convey incomplete information to the project headquarters for their own interests. This leads to information funnel in vertical communication, lack of bridge in horizontal communication, and information "islands" in each project division, which leads to the poor integration of each subproject. In addition to the traditional project management mode commonly used in China, most traditional project management has the following advantages and disadvantages.

Advantages of traditional project management.

(1) Due to the long-term use of traditional project management mode and mature management methods, all parties have a good understanding of relevant processes; (2) Choosing a designer is more convenient to control the design requirements and stages; (3) Select supervisors and let go of project supervision methods; (4) Conducive to contract management and risk management. 2. The shortcomings of traditional project management. (1) The project design-bidding-construction cycle is long, and it is difficult for the supervision engineer to control the project duration; (2) The management and coordination work is complicated, and the owner's management fee is high and the initial investment is high; (3) The total investment of the project is not easy to control, and unnecessary disputes are easy to occur, which will lead to more claims; (4) In case of quality accident, both design and construction parties have the responsibility to pass the buck.