What are the advantages and disadvantages of cabinet system and presidential system?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of cabinet system and presidential system?

1, presidential system and cabinet system, the relationship between government and parliament is different.

In countries with cabinet system, the head of government is usually the leader of the majority party, and its cabinet members are nominated and appointed by the Prime Minister. In Britain, the Prime Minister himself was first elected as the leader of a political party by voters. Only when the party he leads wins the general election can he be appointed as prime minister by the Queen.

Once appointed, he immediately submitted a list of more than 100 government ministers and other ministers to the king, and the king approved it as usual. The Prime Minister selected 20 to 30 senior ministers from more than 100 ministers to form the government. In presidential countries, the president is indirectly elected by voters, and the president selects government personnel and is approved by the Senate.

2. The presidential system and the cabinet system have different responsibilities to the parliament.

In countries that adopt the cabinet system, the cabinet holds the executive power, formulates all internal and external policies, and is responsible to the parliament. It has the responsibility to answer Members' questions and explain the government's policies. In presidential countries, because the president is elected by voters, the government is not responsible to parliament, but only to voters.

In the United States, the three powers of Congress and the government are separated, and each has a constitutional term of office and performs its duties. The president is only responsible to the voters, but the voters cannot recall the president. Congress has no right to recall the president unless the House of Representatives accuses him of a crime and the Senate tries and convicts him.

3. The difference between the presidential system and the cabinet system lies in whether the parliament has the right to vote without confidence.

Under the cabinet system, the parliament has no confidence in the government. In Britain, if the opposition proposes motion of no confidence to the government and it is passed, the government must step down.

In a country with a presidential system, except for the right to bomb and rob, the parliament cannot force the president to resign in the way of motion of no confidence. Bullying is a review and investigation of the president's illegal crimes, and it does not involve the correctness of government policies. It is different in nature from the cabinet system countries, which put forward a vote of no confidence because the parliament is dissatisfied with the policies implemented by the government.

4. The presidential system and cabinet system decide policies in different ways.

Under the cabinet system, government decisions are decided by the cabinet meeting. In Britain, major policy issues are generally discussed by cabinet meetings. The Prime Minister presided over the cabinet meeting and made a concluding speech on the discussion. His concluding speech is the final decision.

Under the presidential system, all cabinet members are subordinate to the president, and government policies are decided by the president. Whether members of parliament can also serve as cabinet members is different. Under the cabinet system, members can also serve as cabinet members, and the government can submit bills directly to the parliament. Under the presidential system, members of parliament cannot concurrently serve as members of the government cabinet, and cabinet members are not allowed to attend parliamentary meetings.