Seek the materials and skills of debating "War embodies the value of soldiers"

1. Soldiers defend their country. (duty)

When the army doesn't need to do anything in peacetime, the police are enough and the soldiers are "redundant". Soldiers are used to keep the peace. If there is no war, there is no need for soldiers. Since they are "redundant", what is their value? So in peacetime, we advocate "disarmament".

3. Raise a soldier for a thousand days and use it for a while. This moment is war. Since ancient times, the value of soldiers has been reflected in the battlefield. (Citing ancient materials)

4. Comparison of the role of soldiers in peacetime and wartime: they can only be used for construction and disaster relief in peacetime, and they fight for their country and shed blood and sacrifice in wartime.

The arguments against the other side can be said from the following angles: since it is peace, there is no need for an army, and the opposing side will definitely be caught. The arguments must be "wars will often happen" and "soldiers are just to guard against wars" and so on, and they are trapped.