Specification for preparation of government procurement documents of Jilin Province Public Resource Trading Center

(Ji Zi Fa [2022] No.23, released on July 18, 2022)

Chapter I General Provisions

Article 1 In order to further standardize the government procurement behavior, optimize the business environment of government procurement, protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved in government procurement, and promote the openness, fairness and justice of government procurement, this Code is formulated in accordance with the Government Procurement Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the Implementation Regulations of the Government Procurement Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and relevant laws and regulations.

Article 2 These Regulations shall apply to provincial organs, institutions, social organizations and relevant units (hereinafter referred to as purchasers) using fiscal funds to purchase goods, projects and services and carry out related activities.

Chapter II Qualification Setting

Article 3 National non-mandatory qualification or certification shall not be used as the qualification conditions of bidders. If the qualifications stipulated by the state are used as the qualifications of bidders, the set qualification grade shall be suitable for the scale and nature of the procurement project, and the qualification grade which is far from the scale and nature of the procurement project and obviously unreasonable shall not be set, so as to restrict suppliers from participating in the competition on an equal footing.

Article 4 If the qualification conditions are based on the similar performance of bidders in non-specific industries in the country, there are generally no more than two performance contracts, the contract amount should not be set, and the specific scope of similar businesses should be defined. The procurement of innovative products supported by government procurement policies shall not put forward performance requirements such as similar business contracts, number of production units, and service life.

Article 5 A purchaser shall not take the scale conditions such as registered capital, total assets, operating income, employees, profits and tax payment of suppliers as qualification conditions.

Article 6 The purchaser shall not take the authorization, commitment, certificate and endorsement of manufacturers other than imported equipment as qualification requirements; Any award-winning situation or ranking of enterprises, products and after-sales service shall not be taken as the procurement threshold condition.

Article 7 The business scope of a supplier shall not be regarded as a qualification condition.

Article 8 The items, qualifications and certificates of administrative examination and approval that are not mandatory in the laws and regulations promulgated by the state and local administrative organs and have been cancelled and adjusted in the State Council shall not be used.

Article 9 Except for factors such as safeguarding national security interests and facilitating the quality of public services, it is generally forbidden to set the ownership form, organization form or location of suppliers.

Article 10 A purchaser shall not arbitrarily set specific qualifications of suppliers and exclude qualified potential suppliers out of the specific characteristics and actual needs of the procurement project and out of illegitimate interests. For procurement projects that are not classified or have no sensitive information, suppliers shall not be required to have classified qualifications; When purchasing information hardware without system integration, suppliers shall not be required to have system integration qualification.

Chapter III Setting of Technical Parameters (Service Standards)

Article 11 If the bidder's performance and awards are required as bonus items or conditions for winning the bid, the supplier may be required to put forward similar performance requirements as bonus items for review according to the technical management characteristics and actual needs of the project itself, but the purchaser shall promise that the number of potential suppliers can meet the competitive conditions.

Article 12 There is no specific brand, patent, trademark, design, country of origin or manufacturer. Not as an evaluation factor or a bonus item; Projects approved by the Provincial Department of Finance to purchase imported goods shall not exclude domestically produced goods that meet the requirements.

Thirteenth as a supplier qualification conditions (procurement threshold conditions) shall not be used as a scoring factor; Administrative examination and approval items, qualifications and certifications that are not mandatory in laws and regulations promulgated by state and local administrative organs and have been cancelled or adjusted in the State Council shall not be used as evaluation factors or bonus items.

Article 14 A purchaser shall not take the scale conditions such as registered capital, total assets, operating income, employees, profits, tax payment, market ranking and market share of suppliers as evaluation factors; Enterprise qualification certificate, employee professional qualification certificate and shortlist issued by trade associations and chambers of commerce cannot be used as evaluation conditions.

Article 15. One or several specific patents, trademarks, brands or suppliers shall not be specifically identified, and other contents of potential suppliers shall not be tilted or excluded.

Article 16 The sales authorization letter, distribution agency agreement and after-sales service commitment letter issued by the production enterprise shall not be used as a scoring factor or a bonus condition.

Article 17 The main technical parameters or service requirements in procurement requirements shall be taken as the content of conformity assessment, and no scoring factor shall be set.

Eighteenth bid evaluation factors should be detailed, quantitative, and corresponding to the corresponding business conditions and procurement needs. If there are intervals between business conditions and procurement demand indicators, the evaluation factors should be quantified to the corresponding intervals, and different scores should be set for each interval.

Article 19 Honorary certificates such as non-national compulsory certification certificate, qualification grade certificate and award-winning certificate, as scoring factors, shall be related to the quality and service of products or services, and the individual score shall not exceed 1% of the total score.

Twentieth technical indicators, business conditions, the scoring factors of individual scores shall not exceed 3% of the total score; The difference between grades should not exceed 3%.

Twenty-first in addition to national awards, national ministries and administrative departments, national quality and technical supervision and evaluation institutions and regional awards are not used as scoring factors or bonus points. National awards as a scoring factor, individual scores shall not exceed 3% of the total score; If the awards of the administrative departments of national ministries and commissions and the national quality and technical supervision and evaluation institutions are used as scoring factors, the individual score shall not exceed 1% of the total score.

Twenty-second business performance, project cases, etc. Because the scoring factor is not limited by the region, the individual score shall not exceed 2% of the total score.

Twenty-third in addition to a single source project, it is not allowed to put forward the requirements of matching with the existing system, docking with the original equipment, and seamless docking with the original system.

Twenty-fourth shall not require the payment of goods and services quality margin, shall not require no loss in financial reports, shall not require the payment of social security for more than several consecutive years.

Twenty-fifth may not be required to test, try out or demonstrate the products after winning the bid and before signing the contract, and change the results.

Chapter IV Setting of Bid Evaluation Methods

Article 26 According to the Regulations on the Implementation of the Government Procurement Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the Measures for the Administration of Public Procurement of Goods and Services and the Measures for the Administration of Private Procurement, the bid evaluation methods of government procurement projects are divided into comprehensive evaluation method and lowest bid evaluation method.

Twenty-seventh technology, service and other standards are unified, and the responsiveness, conformity and acceptability of the tender are easy to judge, or the lowest price (cost) of the goods item is required, the lowest bid evaluation method should be adopted.

Commodities with unified standards refer to general office supplies, general electronic products, information technology products, consumables and other commodities with clear work contents, clear indicators, easy description, consistent identification and easy distinction.

Property services, legal services, general printing, financial auditing, broadband leasing, information services and other projects should adopt the lowest bid evaluation method. , which requires unified service project standards, clear requirements and objective and clear service requirements.

The comprehensive scoring method can be used for large-scale equipment, teaching equipment and other goods with complex technology and strong professionalism, engineering cost, consulting services and other service projects, as well as design services, exhibitions, product promotion and other projects that require suppliers to provide design plans, solutions or organizational plans and cannot be completely determined.

Article 28 When the comprehensive scoring method is adopted, other factors in the procurement demand other than substantive terms shall be reflected through the conversion score. Evaluation factors generally include price, business, technology and service.

The setting of evaluation factors should pay attention to the following contents:

1. The evaluation factors should accurately reflect the requirements of the purchaser;

2. The evaluation factors should be set on the technical or service indicators related to the quotation, that is, only the technology or service related to the bidding quotation and the quality of the procurement target can be set as the evaluation factors;

3. The score setting of the scoring standard must correspond to the quantitative indicators of the evaluation factors, and the indicators that cannot be quantified cannot be used as evaluation factors. If the index is quantitative, the corresponding score must also be quantitative;

4. The factors of comprehensive evaluation must be quantified as objective points to limit the discretion of the judges to the maximum extent.

5. The main technical parameters or service contents in the procurement requirements are taken as the contents of compliance review, and no scoring factors are set.

Article 29 The goods price score of a project subject to tender shall not be less than 30% of the total score; The service item price score shall not be lower than 10% of the total score. The price of the project that implements the national unified pricing standard and adopts fixed price procurement is not listed as a bid evaluation factor. The price score of goods determined through negotiation is 30% ~ 60%; The service item price score is 10%~30%.

The price score should be calculated by the low price priority method, that is, the bid price that meets the requirements of the tender documents and has the lowest bid price is the benchmark price for bid evaluation, and its price is divided into full marks. The price scores of other bidders are calculated by the following formula: bid quotation score = (bid evaluation benchmark price/bid quotation) × benchmark score.

Chapter V Setting of Other Contents in Procurement Documents

Article 30 Under normal circumstances, suppliers shall not be required to provide samples, except in special circumstances, such as the inability to accurately describe the procurement requirements in writing or the need for subjective judgment on the samples to confirm whether they meet the procurement requirements.

If samples are needed, the production standards and requirements of the samples, the evaluation methods and standards of the samples, and whether to submit the test report with the samples should be made clear. If a test report is needed, it should also explain the requirements and test contents of the testing organization.

The score of the 3rd1sample is less than 10. In principle, the quantity shall not exceed 5 (pieces).

Article 32 The demonstration of bidding products is generally not regarded as a substantive clause. In principle, the demonstration is not carried out in the bid evaluation process for projects with the lowest bid evaluation method.

The content of the argument must be quantified, and it is clear what effect each demarcation point needs to achieve in order to score.

Thirty-third demonstration is limited to physical function demonstration, information system demonstration and scheme content demonstration, and the demonstration personnel and time limit are specified. The demonstration score in the comprehensive evaluation method is 5~ 10, which generally does not exceed 10.

Chapter VI Announcement of Change and Extension

Article 34 Necessary clarification or modification of the issued procurement documents shall be made at least five days before the deadline for bidding, at least three days before the deadline for submitting the prequalification application documents, or three working days before the deadline for submitting the first response document; If it is less than the above time, the deadline for submitting bidding documents, pre-qualification application documents or response documents will be postponed. "

Thirty-fifth after the release of procurement documents, unless the purchaser requests to change the qualification conditions of bidders, the bidding scope of suppliers shall not be reconfirmed.

Chapter VII Provisions on Inquiry and Complaint Handling

Article 36 If a supplier believes that the procurement documents harm his rights and interests, he may, within 7 working days from the date of obtaining the procurement documents according to law, submit a written query to the purchaser or procurement agency. Supplier inquiry should be completed at one time according to the format and requirements of supplier inquiry letter.

Article 37 If a query raised by a supplier meets the requirements of the Measures for Query and Complaint in Government Procurement after examination, it shall be transmitted to the purchaser for research reply through the procurement system, and it shall be guaranteed to reply to the questioner before the expiration of the reply period.

Article 38 If the purchaser thinks that the query is invalid after the reply, and the supplier declares that he is satisfied with the reply, and both parties agree in writing to continue the procurement, they may continue the procurement; If the purchaser fails to reply on time or the supplier is not satisfied with the reply, the project will be suspended until the complaint expires or handled according to the complaint opinions of the procurement supervision and management department.

Article 39 When a supplier complains about a project, the document preparation administrator shall report it step by step according to the written notice of the government procurement supervision department, and organize experts to demonstrate the complaints one by one according to the provisions of the expert demonstration method of the Center, and report the demonstration results to the government procurement supervision department in writing.

Chapter VIII Implementing the Provisions of Government Procurement Policy

Article 40 If the procurement demand includes the national compulsory procurement items specified in the Catalogue of Government Procurement Items for Energy-saving Products, it shall be included in the scope of evaluation as a substantive response when preparing the procurement documents, and other energy-saving products shall be listed as preferential price items.

Article 41 The purchaser shall reserve the share of the project exclusively for the procurement of small and medium-sized enterprises, and the qualification of small and medium-sized enterprises shall be regarded as the qualification condition of the procurement project; All goods and services produced or provided for small and medium-sized enterprises enjoy preferential policies for small and medium-sized enterprises.

Disabled enterprises and prison enterprises enjoy preferential policies for small and medium-sized enterprises.

Article 42 The implementation of government procurement policies such as encouraging green environmental protection, supporting the development of underdeveloped areas and ethnic minority areas, and encouraging independent innovation shall be implemented according to the project situation.

For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd