Help me to think of some argumentative materials that refute disorganization and Fiona Fang.

Rules, Fiona Fang's instrument, the moment is square, the rules are round, and the rules are followed. Fiona Fang is. This means that Fiona Fang's vocabulary is meaningless without rules. His inner causality conforms to the general law of the development of things to a certain extent, so people extend it to all aspects of dealing with people and doing things, and teach future generations: without rules, you are not Fiona Fang, which has gradually become the motto of "wise man" in traditional culture.

It is true that, in China, at all times and all over the world, rules can be understood as obeying the law, being sincere and trustworthy, and its Fiona Fang can be described as prosperous and stable. At home, the rules can be understood as respecting the old and loving the young, and keeping filial piety to the grandchildren. Its Fiona Fang can be described as happy and harmonious; In words, it is still form and charm; In martial arts, skills are concentrated by repeating routines ... the game must have rules, so that you can enjoy it because of the rules. Bricks were molded into bricks, which made high-rise buildings; Standardized operation has made industrial civilization, which is the charm of rules.

However, throughout the ages, the old and the new alternate, but the advanced civilization is inherited and developed in the struggle with the old stereotypes. In this process, innovation has been struggling with the old. Whether it is consciousness transcendence, system reform or even technological innovation, breaking the routine and rebuilding Fiona Fang has become an eternal topic in political, economic and cultural development. Without rules, Fiona Fang has become a shield for dogmatism and formalism. They stick to the rules, stick to the rules, and only care about the temporary stability of the country, regardless of the development of benevolence and truth. What would China be like today without Shang Yang's political reform, the Revolution of 1911 and the birth of Marxism? If there is no vernacular Chinese instead of classical Chinese, what will the spread of words or the popularization of education look like today? Without the reform and opening up and the reform of the market economy system, we always adhered to the old rules. What would Fiona Fang look like today? There are countless examples of this. Not only in the long river of history, but also today when we call for the protection of intellectual property rights and advocate independent innovation, such examples happen around us at any time. I heard the voice of "reinventing VI's life" ringing in the marketing process, I saw various management theories staged in the business world, and I smelled the faint smell of gunpowder at the forefront of the market. These bold and unconventional beneficial attempts are getting worse and worse. And this spirit of no rules and no Fiona Fang has existed since ancient times, and will always stand in the future.

You know, there are no rules before the rules. The rules are made by people and will be changed by people. Without rules, Fiona Fang will not be effective at a certain stage of the development of things. At any time, it is very important to look at anything objectively, dialectically and developmentally. Therefore, without rules, it is also a square.

2

No rules, just the square radius.

Two thousand years ago, there was an ideological worker named Monk. He thought that when he was young, he traveled around the world for his political ideals and publicized his benevolent policies to the emperors of various countries. But wherever he went, the emperor was not interested in himself, and his jurisdiction was chaotic, and the people complained. "A tiny place, a small country, why is it still so messy?" Mr. Monk thought hard, and one day it dawned on him that sparrows are small and complete-it is impossible to form a square without rules!

Who knows that the conclusion reached by Mencius after decades of personal experience has actually become an immortal famous saying, ranging from national governance to children's food, clothing, housing and transportation. Later generations said: "If you don't follow the rules, you can't be round."

If there is no rule, can't it be a square? Is this really a universal proposition? I don't think so

We all know the story of Edison dropping out of school. If Edison was unfortunately born in an ordinary family in China (Note: Edison was born in an ordinary family in the United States. ), like most eager parents, the parents of this family are also thinking: "How can a child be admitted to a key middle school without formal primary education? How can I get into a good university if I can't get into a key middle school? How can you have a decent job in the future if you don't get into a good university? So as to enter the mainstream of society? " Therefore, the teacher said that this child can't do it. He needs a tutor or a gift for his teacher. Even if you sell iron in a pot, you should let your children keep up with the progress of the school, follow the same learning path as others, and move towards the "rules" step by step. Because this is our "rule", if we don't follow this "rule", I'm afraid we can't "become a square".

However, our ordinary but respectable loving mother, relying on her love for her children, her expectation for them, and perhaps her disappointment in school education, resolutely took little Edison home and educated him herself. We don't know how the loving mother educated little Edison at home, but when we turned on the light to drive away the darkness, we knew Edison gave it to us; When we listen to beautiful music through advanced audio equipment, we know that it is developed on the basis of the phonograph invented by Edison; When we enjoyed an audio-visual feast in the cinema, we knew that Edison had invented the earliest sound film system. ...

I can't imagine that Edison's later "Chengfangyuan" would have been possible without the "unruly" who loved his mother at the beginning. But this is at least the best example of "if you don't obey the rules, you will become a square."

In a society, there are no rules, but relative to the rigid "rules", everyone is a living person with different characteristics, IQ, ability and emotion. Sometimes, breaking the "rules" will lead to unexpected results. For example, Zhuge Liang's famous empty city plan in history, and Sun Bin's and Pang Juan's wits and wits of "encircling Wei to save Zhao" are all successful examples of "breaking the rules and becoming a square".

In fact, all the "rules" were formed under certain historical conditions, and there was never a fixed "rule". It used to be a "rule" that "a woman without talent is a virtue", but Qiu Jin failed to follow this rule and achieved the achievement of overthrowing the feudal monarchy for thousands of years; In the past, "more children, more happiness" was a "rule", but Ma Yinchu did not use this rule to realize one of the basic national policies in China today-family planning, thus making great contributions to controlling the world population; There used to be a "rule" that "everything is inferior, only reading is high", but the large demand for talents in various fields in modern society has already broken this rule. The current rule is "thirty-six lines, each line is the best." ……

In fact, there is nothing wrong with Mencius' saying that "no rules can make Fiona Fang". The mistake is that this is an open-ended question, but the world has turned it into a multiple-choice question. Many times, "if you don't follow the rules, you will become a party."