The two sides of the lazy economy

Modern society, accelerated tempo, intense competition, the country's "health overdraft" consequences of the beginning of the emergence of information shows that China's cancer mortality rate reached 1.5 million per year. Mental and psychological disorders amounted to 16 million. People want to make some trivial and heavy chores easier, in order to focus their energy and time to deal with more important things. In this way, the burden of work is reduced and the quality of life is improved, which cannot be said to be a manifestation of social progress. Besides, the "lazy economy" has given rise to the "errand economy", which undoubtedly provides employment opportunities for some people, which can also be said to be a great thing.

Some people are worried that the development of the "lazy economy", the more it will be in the city to breed a "pampered" atmosphere, so that the traditional virtues of hard work to lose the market, and even produce a new "urban aristocrats The new "urban aristocrats" will be created. Since parents are the first teachers of children, so "lazy", will not have a negative impact on the growth of children? Also, "lazy people" are generally richer residents of the city, and "errand" runners are feared to be some of the city's wage earners, although it can not be said that the service for others is inferior, but over time, will the integration of rural migrant workers into the city will not bring certain psychological barriers? Will not make some of the original distorted values more imbalanced?

"Lazy people" and "errand boy" is a kind of economic interaction, but also the relationship between service and service. This interpersonal relationship maintains social harmony and fairness and justice. Although the need is an objective existence, "lazy economy" has a reason to rise, but it must be included in the overall track of social construction, so that it is healthy, harmonious development, and is conducive to promoting the city's "ecological balance". Hopefully, the many "lazy people" in the crossroads, do not appear really lazy.