Advantages and disadvantages of the college entrance examination system 200 words

I think this score is very familiar to students in China. Yes, after every scary exam, we are greeted by scores. In China, a country that implements exam-oriented education, scores have become the only assessment method for thousands of students. The university needs scores, and parents should pay attention to the scores. Grades can be said to be the lifeblood of our students. The scoring system seems to have been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, which has also led some parents to think that they should not lose at the starting line. How many children are there? How many children are forced to practice piano even if they don't like it? How many people can be the second Lang Lang? I don't know, but I know that these children have lost their happiness, which are common problems in exam-oriented education. Examination-oriented education refers to the educational thought and behavior that is divorced from the needs of social development, violates the laws of natural development, and aims at coping with the entrance examination. It is a concentrated expression of the disadvantages in education.

Examination-oriented education deviates from quality education and adopts mechanized education to train students. It tests the quality of school education, teachers' work performance and students' academic level by the enrollment rate. It aims at examination, and its educational mode and examination method limit the development of students' ability, which makes it difficult for students to adapt to the requirements of work and social development. Under the examination-oriented education, basic education develops abnormally, and the comprehensive quality of students accepted by higher education is low, which is easy to attach importance to intellectual education and ignore quality. Its main feature is to pursue high scores by unilaterally pursuing the enrollment rate. During the college entrance examination, regardless of students' future, the school will persuade students with poor grades to give up the college entrance examination or change their wishes. Simply put, their test scores determine their fate, which affects their lives. Are these examples still few? Isn't the poisoning incident of Fudan doctoral students, all kinds of poisoning cases of famous schools and crimes a serious impact on exam-oriented education?

Examination-oriented education brings too much pressure to students. Scores determine everything, but ignore the potential advantages. Scores have become the "standard ruler" for teachers to measure the quality of a student. Let's take a look at the United States, and implement the credit system, that is, the score is placed last, with morality and specialization as the measuring line. Compared with China's scoring system, the United States is excellent. I remember a person who once commented on the differences between Chinese and western cultures. China is strict with primary schools. Middle schools force students to study hard, universities mix, foreign primary schools play, middle schools mix, and universities force students to study hard. This is the great difference between Chinese and western education, which should be the most advanced knowledge to learn, but it has been ignored. Many students regard university as a kind of liberation, not a "battlefield" for struggle, while foreign countries focus on advanced knowledge. It can be said that China does not change its educational model for a day and wants to surpass it? How many college students are willing to fight? How many "college students" have really mastered knowledge? A diploma from a famous university can make you enjoy it for a lifetime. Who wants to fight for it The current distribution system is very unfair. The salary of front-line workers is only one tenth or even one percent of that of an executive. This is the current situation. No one wants to be a front-line worker, but they are all moving towards high education, resulting in a sharp drop in the number of front-line workers in the country. Highly educated has become the status quo of today's society. College students are village officials, and college students sweep garbage. What's the use of a university that has struggled for so long? Examination-oriented education only emphasizes abundant knowledge and ignores quality education, which indirectly leads to the lack of quality of people with higher education, such as college students. How many people can you see helping the old man cross the road? How many people can you see giving up their seats on the bus? This is a side effect of exam-oriented education, and it is also the sorrow of education in China. We have been talking about reducing the burden and quality education. I was thinking, is it effective? Rarely, at the beginning of the burden reduction order, parents rushed into the school and beat the teacher because they were dissatisfied with not assigning homework. I think this is the side effect of exam-oriented education. The scoring system has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. How easy is it to change? The disadvantages brought by exam-oriented education are definitely more than these, and there are many "side effects". It must be said that exam-oriented education is a method equivalent to teaching people as robots. In more popular terms, exam-oriented education is equivalent to a modern version of stereotyped writing of scholars who only know how to instill knowledge mechanically, but don't know how to educate them to use knowledge and limit their knowledge to a certain extent. How many Qian Xuesen can there be in the world? Examination-oriented education limits people's active thinking ability, only emphasizes the richness of local knowledge, but ignores how to innovate boldly. It must be said that exam-oriented education is a way of education that does more harm than good.