Is the cross talk of Deyun Society the most primitive traditional cross talk? Why?

The cross talk of Deyun Society is not the original cross talk. Although his basic form is the same, it is definitely different from traditional cross talk, because I think it may not conform to the characteristics to create original cross talk with the changes of the times. Therefore, cross talk should also keep pace with the times in order to maintain its relatively stable development.

In fact, I think cross talk should keep pace with the times. If it is always the same style, the audience will not like it so much soon. So I think culture should be constantly changed and improved. Otherwise, it will be eliminated in the end. In order to ensure the stable development of a team, we must constantly innovate. If it is stagnant, it will definitely make the audience feel very tired. Therefore, authenticity is definitely the basic requirement, but more importantly, it conforms to the aesthetics of modern people.

The second is to respect the original culture. If you don't follow the original intention of crosstalk in the creative process, it is meaningless. Moreover, these innovations are the improvement and re-creation of the original crosstalk. Therefore, the creation of any literary form should be changed according to the original form, which is also the reason why the audience likes cross talk.

Finally, it is in line with the aesthetics of most people. Originally, young people don't like to watch cross talk, and their ratings are relatively low. Therefore, if you keep the original style, it is likely to make young people feel that this thing is meaningless and worthless. Therefore, if you want to be liked by more people, you have to constantly innovate your own content so that more people like to watch it.