Why can't ancient martial arts be played as well as modern fighting?

Hello, I am a professional boxer. Let me explain my point. Both modern fighting and traditional martial arts have their own strengths and weaknesses and their own values. Fighting and countless things are abstract. If there is no one to compose, practice, teach and apply, you can't see or touch it at all, so what matters is the martial artist himself, not what martial arts and fighting you practice, but the actual combat experience of your martial artist. And the most important thing is special combat capability. If your martial arts level is high enough and your special fighting ability is strong enough, then a simple straight punch can kill your opponent. If your level is not high and your special fighting ability is not strong, then even if you practice all the 18 martial arts, you will be equally vulnerable. So there is no difference between fighting and traditional martial arts. It's people, not kung fu. Whether it is traditional martial arts or modern fighting, it is good as long as it is suitable for your own practice and can improve your fighting ability. Besides, some people upstairs don't look at things with your amateur theory. I can only say that you are deeply influenced by martial arts novels and don't understand martial arts at all. Look at things realistically. You don't know who the ancient martial arts practitioners are. Everything is just hearsay. Besides, there is no routine in judo. You think that the so-called routines in judo are just exercises of some basic movements.