Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional festivals - Exciting data from the World Bank
Exciting data from the World Bank
As soon as this person was so exuberant, he forgot about the land billion low-income groups. It seems that because the World Bank published this set of "high credibility" data, self-confidence is again encouraged.
The public summarized, "The World Bank measures the country's comprehensive strength of these 11 quantifiable indicators, if the competition to the analogy, China won eight championships, two runners-up, a runner-up, and the United States only took three championships, the remaining nine runners-up, a runner-up and a fifth.
This public emotionally said, "to know that the United States in the past in the 11 aspects of all the world champions, while China has 10 aspects of even the top 20 can not enter!" Qing chicken bottom to open up the world's first but repeatedly change the history of the war, but also forget the end.
Exactly what data, actually have such magic, let these people how "excited" it? Briefly:
First, the total power consumption: China first, the United States second
Second, the total power generation capacity: China first, the United States second
I have to say: the above two aspects, it seems to be the same thing, right? Need to be hard to get into two things?
Third, manufacturing value added: China first, the United States second.
I have to ask: China's manufacturing value added, are given to whom, is China's profits accounted for less than 1% of the whole benefit, can be ignored?
Fourth, the value added by agriculture: China first, the United States second.
In that case, why is there a "three rural issues" in China? Where does the agricultural value added go, why not benefit farmers, agriculture, rural areas? Why are farmers still leaving their homes, leaving their families behind, and going out to work?
V. Currency and service exports: China first, the United States second.
I have to say: isn't this just the right thing to make up for the hollowing out of American industry?
VI. Arms exports: US first, China fourth. Seven, total imports: China first, the United States second.
I'll say this: don't forget that Chinese imports are priced very high, and Chinese exports are priced strangely low!
Eight, total imports and exports: China first, the United States second.
I have to say: this and the fifth and seventh, not the same thing? Why make it two different things?
Nine, total reserves: China first, the United States fifth.
The author sees this as a basic sign of the country's real available funds and comprehensive economic strength. Bah! China's reserves of the dollar foreign exchange, simply do not spend out, only in the U.S. financial circles around, waiting for its depreciation to zero, how to become a "national real available funds and the basic signs of comprehensive economic strength"? Do you know anything about the economy? Obviously on the opening up, the introduction of foreign investment, exports, foreign exchange reserves, such as the abandonment of the RMB in international trade settlement rights, embraced the right to settle the dollar and other policies, blowing a fart! Really think the Chinese are so stupid? Why don't the United States want to bullshit foreign exchange reserves? People's dollar settlement rights are recognized by you ah, of course they do not need so much bullshit foreign exchange reserves! So, they ranked fifth ah! This item is more of a shame than a glory for China.
Ten, the total tonnage of naval vessels: China's second, the United States first.
This is a bit of progress, which means that China still has a loyal and good generals.
Eleven, military expenditure: the United States first, China second.
......
Someone asked me: what does it mean to circulate such data in the Peking University alumni group?
I said: very simple, it means that the alumni of Peking University who spread this news, as well as the World Bank is "jumping on the bandwagon"!
What do you mean by "jumping the gun"?
Simply put, it's an old-world scam. Usually under the banner of the Queen Mother, or the banner of the Goddess of Mercy, or the banner of any other sacred immortal Buddha, said that some mortals do not understand the words, to make some strange and strange, crazy action, to people to see the doctor, to solve the problem, the guidance of the people who believe in how to how, and then charge. In fact, there is no effect, harming countless people. Jumping God's professionals, women called "witch", "godmother", or three immortal nuns and so on; men called "God Han".
After the founding of New China, "witches", "goddesses", "jumping god" such harmful things by the people's power to clean up, and gradually extinct. So, not many people know about it today.
However, the alumni of Peking University were given data from the World Bank! "Highly credible". Is the World Bank - the financial institution of the advanced, civilized, developed Western world - also a "witch"? Is it also a "witch" and a "goddess"?
Of course they are, and it is in this capacity that they are best suited to do so.
The "witches" and "goddesses" mentioned above are the traditional Chinese culture of "jumping to the gods", the traditional Chinese culture of "witch", "godman", and so on. Witches" and "goddesses" of traditional Chinese culture. Today, the promotion of traditional culture has not yet been completed, and the traditional culture of "witches", "godmen" and "jumping to great heights" has not yet been fully developed and has not yet fully occupied the market. Therefore, today's "god jumpers" are usually labeled as "World Bank," "Harvard University," "Yale University," "famous foreign universities," "the World Bank," "Harvard University," "Yale University," "the World Bank," and "the World Bank. Yale University", "famous foreign think tanks" to jump in the name of "foreign witches", "foreign gods" to jump, at least once in these universities, think tanks At least those who have studied in these universities and think tanks, or those who have been supported by some kind of fund, to jump. This is more convincing.
Those crazy Peking University alumni who publicize these data, in fact, is a "foreign witch", "foreign god", is jumping out of a "data" type of foreign gods.
Those who believe in these data, that "credibility is very high", so that "blood boiling", "excited" guy?
They were fooled! Some people, when they see a big god, they think it's the real one.
Only some people are fooled on purpose, and some are fooled unintentionally. They hold up the World Bank's sign, simulate their appearance, and continue to jump "foreign gods" to cover up the reality of China's accelerated economic, ideological, cultural, and financial fall into colonialism, so as to deceive more people. (Responsible Editor: Deputy Editor)
- Previous article:What is the cultural connotation of jiaozi?
- Next article:Are these lacquer beads valuable?
- Related articles
- What is the bait for goldfish?
- The following are "chaos" of non-traditional security threats.
- What the center flame looks like
- What are the distinctive customs of Fenghuang Ancient City?
- Video Analysis of Traditional Zongzi in Li Ziqi
- Is Liuzhou Arts and Crafts School public or private?
- American traditional industrial distribution area
- What are the differences between green petrochemical industry and traditional chemical industry?
- Scarab 45 cm knitting video tutorial
- Detailed explanation of the price of chicken wing wood tea table Baoji chicken wing wood tea table heirloom