The Bottleneck of Modern Science —— Quantum Mechanics

Since its birth, quantum mechanics has begun to subvert traditional scientific concepts.

As for what quantum is, everyone goes to science popularization, and this article will not elaborate too much.

The scientific problem brought by quantum mechanics is:

First, what is matter and whether there is a material entity.

By subdividing atoms, scientists found that particles were finally divided into strings, but what is a string? To put it bluntly, it is a state of "vibration". It has no substance, just like the air vibration formed by pulling strings, which is similar to a wave state, but does not have the characteristics of physical particles.

Then the problem is coming. In the end, there is nothing in matter, and there is no entity, so the whole thing is broken by "the basic particle is the smallest unit that constitutes the material world", because the particle finally belongs to vanity and has no entity, which is very simple, so the world is an illusion. This is the first question that scientists cannot explain.

The second is the uncertainty brought by the "double-slit experiment".

Specifically, the "double-slit experiment" is to shoot an electron in the form of a laser beam, let it pass through a front partition with two slits, and set a special baffle behind the partition to observe the state of the electron after landing. When no one is looking, the electrons pass through the two slits of the separator at the same time, showing "mutual interference" on the rear baffle (similar to the lines shown by the mutual interference of two circles of water waves). In this way, scientists come to the conclusion that electrons pass through two slits at the same time in the form of waves, which has an interference effect on themselves and themselves.

Scientists further experiment: set up observation instruments next to them, similar to today's cameras, and then do experiments. At this time, electrons no longer exist in the form of waves, but are "transformed" into a single particle, which smoothly passes through one of the slits and forms a projection of a single electron running on the baffle.

Therefore, when no one is watching, an electron passes through two slits at the same time in the form of waves. When people are observing, it seems to consciously "collapse" into a particle, which passes through one of the slits and forms "evidence" on the baffle.

Is "electron" conscious? Can you see if someone is watching it and starting a mystery with others? Or is it because human consciousness is also a kind of energy, and when it participates, it makes electrons form different forms? Scientists have two choices: one is to admit that electrons are conscious; Either admit that human consciousness can determine matter.

These two options run counter to the materialism that "matter determines consciousness". If it is not good, it will slide to "idealism". How can this work?

It is not "scientific" not to admit the reality, because the experiment has been done and it is there; If you admit it, it means that consciousness can decide matter. This has become a typical theology, not "scientific". If quantum mechanics does not advance, it will retreat. From the end of the twentieth century, Einstein put forward that "God can't roll the dice" has been unresolved, that is, when he didn't want to admit the intervention of consciousness on matter and couldn't push it forward, this was the bottleneck of quantum mechanics!

Thirdly, the contradiction that "Schrodinger's cat theory" can't be justified makes "quantum mechanics" almost go to the edge.

"Schrodinger's cat theory" must be understood by everyone. In short: put a cat in a box with characteristics set and slowly get poisoned. However, scientists are not so boring. What they mean is that when participants open the box, they can get the result that the cat is dead or alive. When you open it, the cat may be dead or alive.

Or this explanation is more intuitive. If Tom opens, Tom is lucky, so the cat is alive. Another person, Li Sikai, Li Sikai is unlucky, and the cat may be dead. The life and death of a cat is not "objectively" whether the cat is dead or living in a box, but the "luck" of the participants. This phenomenon often happens when we play poker. If you don't let someone shuffle the cards, they will be bad once they are shuffled. Change the shuffle, everyone is OK. In other words, people's consciousness can be superimposed on one thing and have a great influence on it.

Most scientists really can't refute Schrodinger's cat theory. A big V like Einstein didn't speak. Who are you and have no right to speak? What can we do to neutralize such a reactionary Schrodinger cat theory, so that everyone can have a scientific attitude towards the experiment and find an acceptable step?

Well, under the research of a group of weak scientists who are not confident, the "parallel universe" theory has finally stepped out of the platform, and it is precisely the platform of the "parallel universe" theory that puts science and theology, metaphysics and all religions in a "life-or-death" situation.

The theory of "parallel universes" explains that our world is made up of many "identical" parallel universes. "Schrodinger's cat" is actually the superposition of two or more cats in parallel universes. There are many possibilities, such as "life or death, or not life or death, and death if you want to live". At the moment of opening the box, a participant and the cat formed a certain time and space. If another person, when he opens the box, is associated with a "dead cat" in another time and space, he will see a "dead cat". This theory seems dazzling, but in my opinion, it is as unreliable as a child playing house. Scientists, do you think you can fool the public with the scientific cloak of "parallel universe"? This is ridiculous.

Okay, let me talk about this.

First of all, in this experiment, the cat is not taken as an element as a participant, which is a great failure of Schrodinger's cat theory. Why? Cats are conscious and have the right to decide other observers. You can't be pushed around. Nezha also said, "My life is not predestined". Why can you interfere with my life with your consciousness? Second, if there is a parallel universe, do people in the parallel universe have philosophical or religious beliefs? You would say, yes. Ok, then ask again, from the western point of view, everything has a "God" and God is the only creator. So, is there a God in the parallel universe? If there are, there are two or more gods in the world. How do you make theologians feel? Isn't it obvious to find fault? If only one creator creates two or more parallel universes, it will become that all parallel universes only serve the emperor once. If this is the case, the parallel system is not parallel, but just juxtaposed like a prince, and goes its own way! After all, there are many other adjacent universes, how can they be parallel?

Fourthly, the phenomenon of "quantum entanglement" made the traditional physical world collapse, and quantum mechanics came to an end completely.

Simply put, no matter how far the systematic relationship between two particles is, even tens of billions of light years apart, if one of them is acted on, the other particle will react with this particle at the same time, and the result will be the same. Just like in "Three sworn vows in Taoyuan", the United States died on the same day in the same year, and he was alone.

We know that Einstein's general theory of relativity defines the speed of light as the speed limit of the physical world, and the propagation of force must also follow the time axis. But quantum entanglement has obviously broken through time and space. Without the participation of time, two particles form a life-and-death alliance. No matter how far apart you are, you will live and die together. The moment of "love each other and kill each other until death do us part" is eternal. Please, you scientists can break us up. Just kidding.

So, what channel is used to realize the force on quantum entanglement at the same time? Faster than light? No, let's just say that ftl is unreliable. Even if you can, it will take time.

The universe we discovered is defined as about 93 billion light years old. Even if you put two particles, one in the east and the other in the west, their co-frequency effect is instantaneous and transcends time and space. In this case, Hawking didn't admit that whether you are a wormhole, a curved space-time or a parallel universe, it doesn't work well.

The so-called "you are at the head of the Yangtze River, I am at the end of the Yangtze River, I miss you every day and drink the Yangtze River water"! In a sense, the whole universe is "* * * Yangtze River water". Having said that, I can't help praising the ancients in China. What a cow!

I won't list them. Now the so-called frontier science is the frontier, not the cliff.

Derivative theory: the universe is conscious; The world is a virtual program and so on. This is not enough to explain the world. They are all similar theories, without empirical evidence, more like imagination. In the future, I will discuss these things with you slowly.

The next section discusses how to break through quantum mechanics.