Taobao's new regulations banning offshore publications on behalf of the purchase, what do you think?

Offshore shopping is a new thing, naturally, there are many imperfections, but both online and offline, has been a spark, prairie fire is sooner or later! This is not to say that overseas shopping will replace the domestic shopping, but all people may be "treasure sea shopping" and access to overseas goods, first of all, the advantages of online shopping has been in the course of Taobao very perfect show!

For example, foreign milk powder, such as foreign cosmetics. Our own side of the people are basically in use, and the channel is mostly Taobao's sea purchase!

So, this ban, can not ban the public opinion of the sea purchase!

It's just that there are a lot of problems with the sea Amoy, Taobao is not ready, we are not ready! The "ban" is only!

I believe that Taobao and the relevant regulations, but also the relevant management departments have already begun to plan how to like the current "Taobao", so that we can enjoy the "tempting" "sea Amoy! "The We don't need to "complain" about the ban "unsatisfactory", we should be grateful that there is no such a ban, really big problems with the sea purchase, was banned for a long time, it is not the good thing we hope!

So, here we will only discuss the new trend of sea-buying, the new Kawasaki vitality!

As for the prevention of rivers, the most successful and famous one in history is "Yu's Rule of Water"!

So in today's open era, the globalization of the economy and trade in the context of the management of the introduction of "blocking the river" to "prohibit" the prevention of starbursts, it is also too limited, vision is too shallow.

Moreover, there is too much "administrative intervention" in our lives now! The fact that Taobao has issued such a ban on rules is nothing more than an "administrative order"!

Everything has a problem, then a piece of paper administrative orders, there is no specificity, flexibility, not to mention special measures, and do not implement the "death by a stick". Personally believe that the scientific approach is to solve the "Amoy" problem of the power to really give "Taobao", urge them to continue to improve and optimize, because they may be compared to our administration, more than enough combat experience, more ways to cope with! Because they are the responsibility and development of the main body of the sea purchase! Leave them this problem is simply impossible to solve.

And, on the one hand, we support the overseas development of enterprises, personally believe that "sea" should belong to the foreign exchange and trade, belong to the trend of overseas development of enterprises.

So we should not use administrative "intervention", but by the enterprises themselves to improve and develop!

Look at the management and policy of cultural publications in this context.

First of all, openness and cultural exchanges in the background, if there is a cultural conflict or political and economic influences, interference, or even destructive tendencies, or in a word, the exchange and transmission of the way is too much, simple "blocking" is not possible to solve!

In the context of free communication on the Internet, it is impossible to completely eliminate the text and video of culture and cultural carriers! On the contrary, if you just "block" it, it may generate a lot of "curiosity", and create opportunities for the spread of certain cultural or autonomy tendencies. The last time a Japanese hotel deliberately placed "books propagating Japanese reactionary ideology" in a Chinese hotel, it triggered a lot of people to search for these books and their names and contents.

Looking back, we can see how far we have come in reforming and opening up our country's culture and popular ideas.

In the beginning of the opening up, "many people criticized some people say that the moon in the United States is fuller than in China", and even experts and scholars are worried: the United States as the leader of the Western countries in the attempted cultural infiltration to engage in the "Western learning eastward"!

But the fact is that the result is as Mr. Lu Xun said, "foreign for Chinese", but also with our reform and opening up of the purpose of the match: the introduction of foreign advanced experience and advanced concepts, updated our backward thinking and technology! Although it is undeniable that when advanced ideas come in, negative and even politically inclined things also come in. Some people have asked, "Why don't we put a window screen in place while we open the window to take in the fresh air," so that "flies and mosquitoes" can't get in?

The final fact proves that only a worry and fear, only to scare themselves to death! And the "window screen theory" is not valid or feasible at all, the complexity of the communication program is not what we think! We can only isolate a part of it and let this part of "Western culture" come in and compare it with our traditional culture and political culture, so that we can honestly show the merits of our politics, policies and culture, and really solve the problem of "infiltration and gradual change of Western culture" from the ideological point of view, or even the erosion of political tendency! Even the erosion of political tendencies!

So, I personally believe that the "ban" can only be a temporary, or special period of time measures, not a long-term "strategic policy and arrangement!

Additionally, the promotion of our main themes and policies, and the strengthening of our political party's ability to govern, is the essence, the most critical, the most long-term strategic, in line with the main theme of the times of the creation!

In short, the era of openness requires open creativity and even more innovative thinking!

"Decree" for the "political and human harmony" plan, rather than a ban! There is no scientific follow-up to solve the problem, became a business and the problem of posing the problem of the "mangy dog"!