The following is a debate: "easier said than done" or "easier said than done"? We are the opposition and support "easier said than done". How to refute and refute?

In favor: Nanjing University is hard to know and easy to do.

Objection: Fu Jen Catholic University is easier said than done.

PRESIDENT: Welcome to the '95 International University Debate Competition jointly sponsored by China CCTV and Singapore TV. Today will be the long-awaited grand final and the climax of this debate.

In the past six days, eight debating teams have played four preliminaries and two semi-finals, and each team has performed well.

On the surface, the debate seems to be an advanced intellectual game, but the knowledge and wisdom it evokes, especially the personality of debaters and the overall youthful charm, are not available in the debate itself. Of course, since it is a debate, there will always be winners, so the two teams sitting on the court today are "determined to win." With a little attention, both sides will find a very interesting coincidence. In my opinion, it happens to be male left and female right. On the one hand, they are good at dancing with long sleeves, and on the other hand, they are "curious, good men want to fight with women." In the past, we all said "Long Hudou" and "Long Hudou". It seems that today will be changed to "Dragon and Phoenix Becoming Lucky".

Now let me introduce both sides of today's debate. Sitting on my right is the square-Nanjing University Team. Their four debaters are: Yi Zhong Yi Chen, a third-year student in sociology; Re-debate of Wu Jian's Department of Civil Law in Level 4: the third debate is Lu Han, a sophomore in economics; Four Debates: Yang Wei, a first-year graduate student of Chinese Department (applause). Then the team sitting on my left is Fu Jen Catholic University. If you have watched the past few games, you may be quite familiar with these debaters. They are: Gu Zhenhao, a third-year student of Yi Debate Law Department; Li Lishu, a classmate in the second debate, is a junior in the Finance and Economics Law Group of the Law Department. The third debate competition is Liu, a third-year student in the journalism department of the Department of Mass Communication; Four Debates Lin Zhengjiang, a junior in Finance and Economics Law Group of Law Department. (Applause)

Our jury today is composed of famous Li scholars at home and abroad. Let me introduce them to you. The five members are: Professor Ping Jiang from the Law Department of China University of Political Science and Law (applause). Professor Wei, Professor of History and Philosophy in China, Harvard University, and Academician of the American Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences (Applause). Professor Wang Yuanhua, President of China Literary Theory Society and President of East China Normal University (applause). Professor Sun Kangyi, Director of the East Asian Language and Literature Department of Lu Na University (applause). Professor Yu from Shanghai Theatre Academy. (Applause)

Ladies and gentlemen, it is difficult to know what is easy and difficult to know what is easy is a classic proposition in the sense of traditional culture. All the Taisa people in the past dynasties sighed deeply and left many famous conclusions. In real life, it is easier to know than to do, and everyone will make different answers according to their own life experience. I hope today's eight debaters can also put forward convincing arguments on this issue. As an active team, the debate position of Nanjing University is "easier said than done". As the opposing side, the debate position of Fu Jen Catholic University team is: "It's easier said than done." The positions of both sides are decided by drawing lots.

First of all, please welcome Zhong Chan, the first debater of the positive side, to speak for 3 minutes.

Professor: Thank you, Chairman! Dear judges, distinguished guests and another debater from Bao Dao, hello! 500,000 years ago, our ancestor Beijingers lived in this land under our feet. Things have changed, and the stars have changed, saying goodbye to the past of eating and drinking blood. They learned to drill wood for fire. The use of fire is a great discovery that transcends the times. However, it was not until more than 100 years ago that scientists uncovered the law that mechanical energy was converted into heat energy, thus scientifically explaining the real mystery of drilling wood for fire. This irrefutably proves our position that it is easier said than done. The so-called "behavior" is the process of human action on external things, including the use of "knowledge"; The so-called "knowledge" refers to the understanding of "doing" and solving the problems of doing what, why and how. Knowledge is both a process and a result. The so-called "easy to learn from difficulties" means that it is difficult to learn knowledge and easy to use. It's easy to do things while knowing difficulties, and it should not be confused with his view of words and deeds, which is easier said than done. We advocate walking despite difficulties for the following reasons: First, cognitive genetics tells us that after being a prophet, we should walk despite difficulties. People can do it at birth. The so-called "dancing". "But it is difficult to be a knowledgeable and charming gentleman like other debaters. Personal knowledge is endless, and human exploration is endless. " The deeper you drill, the stronger your back will be. "(1) Confucius his old man's house still insist on learning the Book of Changes, weft knitting three unique. Visible learning is difficult! Secondly, dialectics tells us that cognition and action are closely related. Human behavior is a process of continuous progress, in which knowledge is the key. The journey of ignorance is just a simple repetition. With knowledge, there will be conscious behavior; With knowledge, there will be development and introduction. As the understanding, generalization and summary of action, knowledge is the beacon and guide of action; Only by mastering the knowledge and methods of business can you succeed. Know that only long-term hard exploration will achieve something, so knowing is more difficult than doing. Third, daily experience tells us that it is not easy to do it. In the final analysis, knowing or not knowing is not enough. As the saying goes, "it is not difficult to meet people, but it is not difficult to meet difficult people." "That's the truth. Once you have mastered the knowledge and methods of doing things, you will be as skilled as an expert in understanding cows. To sum up, knowing is more difficult than doing. Thank you! (Applause)

President: OK, ladies and gentlemen, now let's see how the other side puts forward their views. Please debate the opposing side, and Gu Zhenhao will speak for 3 minutes. Please.

Against: Hello, Madam President, ladies and gentlemen! The topic separates knowledge from practice, which requires us to discuss the difficulty. If pure cognition and action are confused, where do the difficulties come from? The first contradiction put forward by the opposing debater is the process of incorporating knowledge into the line. Is it necessary to discuss lines? Any era needs the cooperation of knowing and doing, but different eras need the theory of knowing and doing. Generally speaking, there are only two kinds of knowledge, one is the conscience of morality and ethics, and the other is the knowledge of so-called scientific experience. Next, I will discuss the relationship between "knowledge" and "behavior" from these two aspects. First, looking around today's society, education and technology are becoming more and more popular, but people's moral behavior is becoming more and more degenerate. The so-called eating, drinking, whoring, gambling, smoking, cheating, cheating, stealing and social unrest are the problems we should face. At this moment, we can't help wondering, is this really the case? Is it because knowledge, education and culture are not enough? Isn't the problem specific implementation and practice? Don't we know the so-called benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom? Don't we know the so-called ordinary citizen morality? What does traditional Confucianism tell us? The so-called "goodness of human nature, even if it is still water, will decline." . There is nothing wrong with people, and there is no water. "Mencius didn't say. Is "benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom" the four ends of human beings? Mr. Wang Yangming even told us that today's so-called conscience is inherent in the heart and is innate. Therefore, we already know some basic principles of dealing with people and the so-called general Buddhist morality. Conscience is what we hold in our hearts. Isn't it clear and simple? Where is the difficulty? The difficulty is "ok"! The difficulty lies in the specific practice. Because of the slack of people's hearts, due to various restrictions and variables of the external environment, it is harder to say than to know! From the second aspect-scientific experience, it is easier said than done. Top quarks have been able to prove the existence of so-called top quark particles in physics for a long time, but we can't really grasp this concept before the accelerator is produced. After Einstein invented the theory of relativity, it took a long time for people to build an atomic bomb. To sum up, what common problems can we find? Common faults are one thing to say and another to do. That's why I just want to analyze what is hard to know and what is easy to do here. What is easier said than done? Only by recognizing what you know easily can you recognize what you don't know but just don't want to do. Therefore, knowing is not only knowing, but also doing. Actions must be coordinated. Therefore, after understanding the truth that it is easier said than done, it is necessary to prescribe the right medicine and hope to cure the disease! Thank you! (Applause)

-

-Author: Teana

-Release date: June 27th, 2005 at 0: 56.

-

Chairman: thank you, Mr gu zhenhao! Now, please ask Wu Jianmin, a student in the second debate, to further elaborate on the positive side. The time is also three minutes.

Professor: Thank you, Chairman! Hello everyone! The other debater put forward a point: "It's one thing to say, but it's another thing to do." Obviously, they stole today's "relationship between knowledge and action" into "relationship between words and deeds". Did you really know when you said it? Parrots can still speak human words after training, but can we say that these parrots are as knowledgeable as their opponents? Obviously not! (Applause) Today, it has become a world trend to respect knowledge and talents, develop high technology and explore new fields. Humans have deeply understood that it is easy to walk despite difficulties. Only by facing difficulties directly can we walk briskly. The reason why we think what we know is difficult to do is more based on the following reasons. Firstly, it is more difficult to create knowledge than to use it. Today, people have turned a blind eye to electric lights, but Edison went through hardships and never changed his mind. He tried more than 1600 materials, made more than 10000 experiments and wrote 20000 pages of notes. You can see how difficult it is! Dr. Sun Yat-sen, the great revolutionary forerunner, traveled around the world and devoted himself to revolutionary research. He almost died in London, and finally worked hard to form People's Republic of China (PRC)'s founding strategy. Faced with such a fact, does the other debater have to tell everyone that it is easy to know? Schopenhauer put it well: great thinkers and scientists are the beacon of classification. Without them, human beings will wander in the confused sea! Second, it is more difficult to explore methods than to use them. Seeking knowledge includes not only general principles, but also specific methods. Legend has it that ancient Gun blindly used the method of covering soil with water, which led to flooding. Yu took his father as a mirror, explored the method of dredging, and finally achieved a comprehensive victory in flood control and disaster relief. Third, it is more difficult to know the law than to act according to law. Understanding the law is a process of accumulating sand into gold. Law is not a salesman, it won't come to you by itself. It needs people's unremitting exploration. The transformation and utilization of desert resources is a difficult problem to understand the law. Once human beings have overcome this problem, desert to oasis will no longer be a mirage. To sum up, understanding is a difficult and tortuous process. He needs the sense of responsibility of "God will hand over the great task to the Sri Lankan people", the courage of "I will search up and down" and the perseverance of "many people will look for him". Once we thought it was difficult to know and easy to do! Thank you all. (Applause)

PRESIDENT: Thank you for your speech! Now let's see how the students who oppose each other refute the positive views. The time is also 3 minutes.

Objection: Hello everyone! What kind of proposition did the other debater tell us? What the other party wants to know is to tell us what we know but not what we can do. Just unknown! Another debater, under such a proposition, let's see where today's argument should stand. If that's the case, the other debater told us that all the knowledge, everything you know is false unless you experience it one by one. For example. Today we know that it is immoral to throw garbage, and I also know that it is moral not to throw garbage. Then when I am throwing garbage, can you tell me: I have forgotten morality at that time, don't I know morality? When I lost it, I suddenly realized that my morality appeared again. In other words, what did the other debater tell us? Under this framework, the other debater just tells us: knowing without doing it is just unknown. So what is knowledge? What is the unknown? Don't forget a sentence: "knowing is knowing, not knowing is not knowing, just knowing." Don't confuse the opposing debater. Well, I'll tell you from three aspects. It may be difficult to know, but it's even harder to do. First of all, in terms of weather, Mencius said: "Although wise, it is better to guide the situation: although there is a foundation, it is better to wait for the time." If it weren't for the situation of the Three Kingdoms, Liu Bei would have taken care of the thatched cottage, and the east wind in Chibi was brilliant. Despite his strategic wisdom, Kong Ming would not have been able to show his talents and make a big splash, and he would eventually fall into a "place where heroes are useless." Let's take a look at the limitations of the geographical environment. With the advanced technology in today's architecture, it is easy for us to know what methods and materials should be used to build the Three Gorges Dam, but it will take 15 years from start to completion. This project is huge and arduous, and it is entirely caused by the environment. Moreover, it is the logic of our human life to know what is easy and difficult. Everyone knows that men and women should care about each other and men should treat women equally, but after 20 years of long women's movement, women's status has not improved, so we should hold a women's conference in Beijing to continue our efforts! (Applause) Moreover, what we want to tell you is that individuals in today's society, whether they are environmental protection, women's rights, democracy, legal system, education, peace, culture or morality, all embody the truth that it is easier said than done. Only by recognizing the true meaning of what is easier said than done can we understand and understand. It is a common problem for people in China to sit and not talk. Only by taking the right medicine can we get rid of the disease, let everyone stand up bravely and be ashamed of empty talk, and give full play to the true spirit of China's traditional foolish old man moving mountains! My application is over! Thank you! (Applause)

CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr. Lin Lishu! Now, please ask Lu Han, a student of the third debate on the active side, to speak for three minutes. Please.

Pro: Hello, everyone! The other party talks about morality and ethics with us, which means saying one thing and doing another. Do you really understand morality? Please ask another debater to explain to us what is "full of benevolence and morality, full of men stealing women *"? Another debater also said that some people don't know, but they don't want to do it. So, is this an excuse for thieves? Because the thief said, "I really don't know that stealing is bad, but I can't help but reach out my third hand"! The other side argues that men need love more than women, so since the other side argues that it is easier said than done, we want to ask a question, how can we open a man's closed heart? How can we make a man an open man? Well, we think it's easier said than done. Turning the page of history, the great cause of human understanding and exploration can be described as "earth-shattering, crying ghosts and gods." "Life is precious", but Lilienthal gave his life for science. "Love is more expensive", but Nobel lived alone for his career. Li Shizhen tasted a hundred herbs before he got the "rejuvenation", and Sima Qian made great efforts to make it a "family statement". As you must know, the theory of evolution was born after decades of painstaking efforts. Bruno condensed the truth with his life. "The soul goes back and forth." "Difficulties and hardships, Yucheng." Throughout the ages, it is this knowledge seeker who has knocked on the door of knowledge with blood and life, which has cast the backbone of human civilization. Facing up to real life is not always smooth as debaters say, but a deep understanding of what is known tells us that it is more difficult to know than to do. "The road to knowledge is long, and human beings are searching up and down." Peace is difficult, and the difficulty is that the understanding of all countries has not yet been reached; Anti-corruption is also difficult, and it is difficult to know the way to stop corruption; It is more difficult to cure AIDS, and the difficulty lies in the lack of breakthrough in medical knowledge. Knowing will make things easier. Extensive and profound knowledge and profound thoughts are really hard-won, but what you get is courage in action and calmness in work. Overseas telephone calls sent out "God never shuts one door but he opens another", and radio waves sent out heartfelt feelings; Credit card allows us to "travel all over the world with one card in hand".

-

-Author: Teana

-Release date: 00: 57 on June 27th, 2005.

-

Free debate:

Pro: Of course, this process of seeking knowledge is also a cicada. We say that knowledge means seeking knowledge and learning! Action is the meaning of action. Another student said it's good to know, so please tell the people of Zaire how to prevent and treat that terrible Ebola virus, which is even more terrible than AIDS!

Counterparty: The opponent's debater said it well. If we define the process of cognition as knowledge, as another debater said, then we will find that knowledge is basically everywhere today. But this is not the case! Today, for me, seeking knowledge is an act. If there is any difficulty, as another debater said, it is the behavior difficulty of seeking knowledge, not knowledge itself. Another debater! (Applause)

Professor: The comparison of knowing and doing is, of course, a process of comparing knowing and doing. Other students compress knowledge into results and expand lines into processes. So how can a result and a process be more difficult? (Applause)

Counterparty: Do what the other party says, and the next steps should be very simple after the principle appears. Then, Plato, two thousand years ago, told us that there is no "ideal country" today.

Agree: The other side argues that it is because we haven't found the right way to reach the ideal country, or we don't know much about it! The other debater just said that knowledge is easy to learn. Let's ask the other debater again. Are there aliens in this world? How can we communicate with aliens and become friends?

Opposing party: The other party said that there was no way to "realize the ideal country". Then Marx has long said the ideal and realization steps of building socialism. Why do you need the efforts of Mr Mao Zedong and Mr Deng Xiaoping to reform? Why is China still in the "primary stage of socialism"? Isn't "doing" more difficult than "knowing"? (Applause)

Pro: Didn't you see the other debater? After we put forward the correct reform strategies and methods, China's reform has made great achievements in 17! I would like to ask another debater, Sister Lin of Daguan Garden, who drank so much ginseng soup and tonic, but could not cure her lung disease. But today, consumption can be cured, and terminal diseases emerge one after another. I wonder if this is not the credit of knowledge, but the credit of "doing"? (Applause)

Opposing party: opposing party should not jump out of the topic of discussion. Today's knowledge is a static cognition and understanding. Everyone with a high school education or above knows Einstein's great formula-"The energy emitted by an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by the square of the speed of light", and also knows that the atomic bomb is made according to this formula. Then I want to ask everyone here, you have never seen any high school graduate make an atomic bomb. (Applause)

Founder: Do other students remember this famous saying? Montaigne of France said: "Memorizing is not equal to mastering knowledge." Does the other classmate say that rote memorization equals complete knowledge? (Applause)

Counterparty: In other words, my opponent, if there is a doctor who specializes in treating gastric ulcer today, he has gastric ulcer himself. Do you want to say that he doesn't know how to treat it? I don't know how to maintain it

Founder: This doctor is going to find a doctor who is better at treating gastric ulcer to treat his illness! The other classmate just said that learning is not seeking knowledge, and studying hard is not seeking knowledge. Only the result of that diploma is to know. Then why do we start from elementary school and get our diplomas only in our senior year? (Applause)

Opposition: Opposition, we all know that everyone makes mistakes. According to you, as long as you make a mistake, you don't know. Then we have two questions for you to answer directly. First, I don't know that as long as I can make mistakes, people are not saints. "Who knows the truth in this world? Second, if you say that keeping the correct concept is knowledge, then in which century will real knowledge, your knowledge, appear-when mankind dies? (Applause)

Pro: The other classmate said it well. In Song Dynasty, Lu Jiuyuan once said, "If you know your mistakes, you can go, and if you know your mistakes, you can change them." If he really knows the truth, why doesn't he correct his mistake?

Opposing party: That is to say, under the framework of opposing debaters, I really don't know when it will appear, and it may not appear until the death of the earth, so "I love my teacher, I love truth more" should be changed to "I love my teacher, I love ignorance more"! (Applause)

Professor: We say that knowledge is a process, a process of accumulation bit by bit. Debate friends, we accumulate true knowledge all the time in the process of seeking knowledge. How can we say that real knowledge will not be available until the earth dies? So all four debaters are "ignorant" people sitting here? (Applause)

Counterparty: The opponent's debater said it well. You also admit that real knowledge happens through the constant test of action, so the difficult thing should be the process of action, which is full of difficulties. When the process of action overcomes the difficulties, true knowledge naturally comes into being, which is the true meaning of today's "teacher" (1), the opposing debater! (Applause)

Agree: Another debater said that knowing and doing come from doing, so knowing is easier said than done. Then we know that people evolved from apes. According to another debater, does it mean that being a monkey is miserable or even more difficult, while being a man is "easy to live"?

Counterparty: My opponent, please don't apply Mr. Wang Yangming's definition of knowing as one. Did another debater tell us that charcoal must be compressed and pressurized before it can be turned into a diamond, so charcoal is actually a diamond? Can the opposing debater explain this?

In favor: the opponent's debater makes a mistake, which is the unity of knowledge and action of the opponent's debater. We have repeatedly said that the process of seeking knowledge is knowledge, and our practice is to use this knowledge. How can we say that we are one of knowing and doing?

Counterparty: The debater of the other side has always told us that when mistakes are constantly detected, we won't know until we come out. According to the logic of the other debater, then I will always know and always do it. Isn't this called "integration of knowledge and action"? !

The positive side: does this person constantly know and then guide the line, and then gain knowledge from the line? That is to say, knowing and doing are both "knowing and saying are doing, and doing is knowing"? So, other debaters, are you sitting here today to know or are you good at this? Are you a person who knows and knows?

The opposing side: the opposing side argues with friends, which is the so-called "conscience"! You said that you should use all your efforts to discover knowledge today. These efforts are all actions. Today's trip has two meanings: one is to explore the truth, the other is to practice the truth. How can you say that it is ok to practice the truth without exploring it? Please answer directly. (Applause)

Professor: We say that seeking truth is of course a process of seeking knowledge. It is difficult to ask the other side to argue. Do you want to turn difficult things into easy things?

Opposing party: opposing party, what we are debating today is a theoretical phenomenon and truth. "It is difficult to do things" and whether people should be encouraged to do them are two different things. Even if it is difficult to argue today, we can still encourage others to argue. I'm afraid today you advocate quitting after knowing difficulties. Are you telling people to leave those difficult things alone?

Pro: I'm not saying that I don't care, but I want to make things simple. What shall we do? We must solve the problem of knowledge! Wang Shuli, an associate professor of sociology at Fu Jen Catholic University, also said that in recent years, the crime problem in Taiwan Province Province is serious, and it is more difficult to find effective strategies. Do you feel the same way? (Applause)

Counterparty: So everyone knows that there should be no crime, no violence and no bad things, but these things keep coming out one after another. Isn't that why he didn't do it ... (at the end of the whistle)

In favor: The other debater said it well. It is precisely because the other debater knows that he should not commit a crime and that he should not make mistakes, so we see that all four students are charming gentlemen!

PRESIDENT: Please continue to speak.

In favor: the other debater said that it is difficult to learn from good people and to talk about morality now. So we should reflect on this phenomenon morally and know why. Is it more difficult?

Pro: "People are not born to know." So Confucius said, "If you don't stop learning, it will be enough to close the coffin." Confucius said, "Never tire of learning, never tire of teaching." Is it easy to know the direction?

Founder: Another student just gave many examples of hard work, but is it difficult to sweat hard? Another student thinks it is difficult to run twice on the playground ... (whistle ends)

-

-Author: Teana

-Release date: 00: 58 on June 27th, 2005.

-

PRESIDENT: Sorry! Time is up. Well, ladies and gentlemen, the free debate just now was very exciting, and the concluding speech to be made by the fourth debater from all sides is often more important. Let's start with Lin Zhengjiang, and the opponent's four arguments will last for 4 minutes. Please.

Objection: Hello everyone! China people are really amazing! What did you say?/Sorry? Because China people can use one word to symbolize many meanings. How can I put it? The "knowledge" mentioned by another debater today is actually the product of the integration of knowledge and practice. The so-called true knowledge today is "knowledge" that needs constant action, and the middle "process of doing" refers to "process of knowing", not "doing". However, ladies and gentlemen, let's think about it. Why on earth should we discuss such a topic? The real significance of discussing such a topic should be to make everyone stand on the same footing, which is more difficult than pure cognition or practical action. Another debater wants to tell us in an upside-down way that the process of pursuing truth is called "the process of knowing", not "the process of doing". However, I want to ask you, isn't it a practice that Edison invented electric light with several metals? His purpose is to prove his theory, isn't it? We want to tell each other that the purpose of any theory is that it can explain the world. However, the knowledge of moral conscience that we emphasized at the beginning is really easier said than done! Today, can you say that the murderer doesn't know that he shouldn't kill at that moment? No, he knows. Just for an instant, he was carried away by his own desires and impulses and forgot not to kill people. The opponent's statement is: "As long as you are making a mistake, you don't know! As long as you do something wrong, it is not true knowledge! Then we don't know. If a person wants to gain true knowledge, I'm afraid it's really a so-called closed coffin. To test his past history at the moment of his death, what he didn't do is true knowledge. So, is it fair? (Applause) Moreover, let's discuss the knowledge of scientific knowledge. Is it easier said than done, or easier said than done? Everyone here doesn't know what the shape of a circle is, but now I'll give you a pen. Can you draw a positive circle by hand? This is the standard "easier said than done"! Even if you are given compasses, you will not be able to draw a scientific circle because of different shades of pigments and different line thicknesses. Isn't this the best portrayal of "knowing difficulties and doing things easily"? As we told you in the debate just now, if the other debater takes whether he has made a mistake as a concept, then today's understanding of smoking is not the moment of death. When he really shed his last tear, the other debater will say, "He really knows." However, when he got the cigarette case and saw that "smoking is harmful to health", it didn't know to turn a blind eye and turned a deaf ear. Is this in line with everyone's rule of thumb? What we want to tell you is that Confucius once said, "If the name is irregular, the words are not smooth, and if the words are not smooth, nothing will be achieved. "Today, we use practical actions to compare the pure spiritual experience with great cognitive difficulty, and confirm the proposition that it is easier said than done. Then what we need to do next is: because walking is more difficult, it is better to walk than to sit. Let's practice together. If you argue with each other about the concept of easy behavior, you don't have to explore the methods of easy behavior, you just have to do it regardless, because easy behavior is so easy! How to be careful between reasons? Don't worry! So to sum up, we find that, first, there is no way to accurately distinguish each other's knowledge and behavior. Another debater also wants to tell you that the process of pursuing knowledge is "knowledge" rather than "action". Even if you try your best to do it, it is "knowing" rather than "doing". Second, it is easier to explain the world by knowing than by doing, and it can give more enlightenment to human beings by using methods that are difficult to know and easy to do. Therefore, we want to tell you that it is natural and imperative for such an idea to appear. Thank you! Thank you! (Applause)

Professor: Thank you, Chairman! Hello, judges, distinguished guests! We have just discussed the philosophical proposition of knowing and doing for so long, and the process of seeking knowledge is really difficult! The eloquence and sincere manner of the opponent's debater are really touching, but if you think about it carefully, it doesn't seem to cover up some mistakes in their argument.

First of all, other students don't know what they know and do, and record all the credits they know in the ledger. The comparison of knowing and doing should be the comparison of two processes, while the other students regard knowledge as a static result and line as a dynamic process. How do they compare? Second, the concept is unclear. There are two kinds of knowledge, one is "scientific knowledge" and the other is "moral knowledge", but other students all talk about morality, so we don't want science today? What is moral common sense, and the other party says it is conscience, then the other party's conscience is "Sister Lin fell from the sky"? Can people easily know? Third, change the debate. Another student cited many examples to demonstrate the relationship between words and deeds. But what we are discussing today is the relationship between knowing and doing, and words are by no means equal to knowing! Let me sum up our views further.

First, go through the prophet. You don't necessarily know what you can do, but you must do what you can know, so it is difficult to know and easy to do. Second, you may encounter some obstacles in your action. In the final analysis, it's because you don't know enough or know very little. Turning resistance into motivation, people should follow the guidance of wisdom, so they go ahead despite difficulties. Third, it is easy for individuals to explore knowledge, but it is even more difficult for everyone to reach * * * knowledge. Didn't we argue so fiercely with the other debater just now because we couldn't unify our thinking and reach a consensus? But as long as everyone knows, they can unite; If we unite, we can move Mount Tai. So still?