A draft of the debate

I think Lida: (Compared with the ancients, because the ancients didn't develop science) From the perspective of life, compared with the ancients, those Beijingers who live in caves don't have all the electrical appliances we have now, so it's too much to talk about one. Just give a few examples of basic necessities of life, such as computers and airplanes. From the perspective of work, the ancients only hunted and cultivated, while modern people worked too much. From the perspective of education, the ancients still used living people as sacrifices.

From the human point of view, human development and growth can not be separated from science and products brought by science.

However, the development of science has made people's dreams come true from ancient times to the present. In ancient society, people could only eat and drink blood. Now, let's see how much progress we have made in food, clothing, housing and transportation. Can we live so comfortably without scientific development? It used to be that a little cold and fever could kill people, but now medicine can bring them back to life. It used to be "it is rare to be 70 years old", but now it is not unusual to live to 100 years old. Isn't this the credit for the development of science and technology? Cars and planes, trains and ships were unimaginable in ancient times. A few kilometers is an adventure. Now, the earth is like a small village, which can rotate at any time.

Without the progress of science and technology, how can you eat hybrid 2? How can I put on cotton-padded jacket and live in a tall building?

China's 8,000-year history of civilization is irrefutable evidence. History has been changing and technology has been developing. Humans learn to use or cook food from primitive life, from relying on nature to thriving, from unarmed to metallurgical smelting. This is not progress, this is not development? If the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, then why do human beings choose progress in unison? Only progress can make tomorrow better!

If you say that the development of science and technology does more harm than good, can you come to class without a car, a ballpoint pen and a pen within a week? Can you stop watching TV, listening to the news, reading newspapers, reading books and surfing the Internet for a week? Can the developed hybrid rice not be eaten for a week? No spaghetti? Don't drink? No, no and no, because technology is closely related to you and inseparable from you! Now you write to the chairman and suggest stopping all scientific research activities. Do you want to send flowers or pat bricks?