Advantages and disadvantages of China's civil servant assessment system

Advantages: 1 The following positions of the chief clerk "must be tested and selected", which embodies social fairness and justice.

2. China's civil service system is a civil service system with China characteristics. Its basic spirit is: first, always adhere to the party's basic line as the fundamental guiding ideology for the establishment and implementation of the civil service system. Second, to implement the civil service system, we must adhere to the party's management of cadres and implement the policy of "four modernizations" and the principle of having both ability and political integrity. The third is to inherit and carry forward the fine tradition of cadre and personnel work in China. The fourth is to summarize and improve the fresh experience of the reform of the cadre and personnel system. The fifth is to absorb and learn from the beneficial practices of foreign civil service systems.

The main differences between China's civil service system and the western civil service system are as follows: First, the civil service team is an important part of the party's cadre team, and should accept the party's leadership, adhere to the socialist direction, and not engage in political neutrality. Second, civil servant management is not an independent management system. Party committees at the central and local levels are responsible for selecting, appointing and managing civil servants who hold leading positions. Third, civil servants do not distinguish between politics and business, emphasizing that the nature of civil servants' work is the same regardless of their positions, and unifying their responsibilities to the country and the people. Fourth, civil servants and other categories of staff can communicate with each other according to their work needs and their own conditions, and do not engage in a closed management system.

Disadvantages: 1 Most of the research on the civil service system focuses on static description, rather than real analysis, deduction and criticism.

Most importantly, there are few dynamic analysts and even less research. 2. The research on the civil service system itself is systematic, objective and systematic, and it is difficult to see the whole picture of the civil service system reform. 3. The historical evolution of the civil service system is discussed in detail, but the research on the future reform trend of the civil service system is relatively thin. 4. The research on individual systems of the civil service system is relatively rich, and the comprehensive and systematic research is relatively scarce.