Generally speaking, the dynasties after Qin Dynasty held a () attitude towards feudalism in the traditional sense of China.

Generally speaking, the dynasties after Qin Dynasty were against feudalism in the traditional sense of China.

"Feudal system" is a relatively broad concept, which covers a wide range, including other specific social, political and economic systems. However, in the history of China, "feudal system" usually refers to the social and political system in which centralization and local strongmen are interdependent, and the enfeoffment system is only a part of this system model.

The "feudal system" in this topic refers to the system of enfeoffment. Under this system, the central government controls the administrative power of all localities and gives certain land and official positions to governors. Territorial dispersion, external unification and internal division make it impossible for the kingship to completely control other vassal States, and sometimes it is even difficult to maintain its own stability.

After the unification of the six countries, the Qin Dynasty adopted measures such as centralization and local official system. Compared with the traditional model of feudal decentralization and local separatism, this highly centralized political model is more conducive to governing a huge country. Therefore, from the Qin Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty, there were indeed some dynasties in China that opposed the feudal system and promoted the political, economic and social progress and development to a certain extent.

Concentration of power:

Centralization in ancient China refers to a political system in which the political, military and economic power of the whole country was gradually concentrated in the hands of the central government, and the administration and economy of all parts of the country were highly controlled.

Centralization was introduced in the Qin Dynasty, further improved in the Han and Tang Dynasties, and reached its peak in the Ming and Qing Dynasties. Through the central official system, land merger and other means, the central government's ability to manage various places has been strengthened.

Centralization is conducive to maintaining national stability and developing economic activities, but it may also lead to excessive centralization and is not conducive to local development.