Similarities and differences between people-oriented, people-oriented thought and humanism

All three thoughts emphasize the role of human beings, put people first, promote the positive progress of society, and oppose theocracy, religious right, monarchical right and political privileges other than human beings.

1, as early as thousands of years ago, Chinese civilization had the people-oriented thought. Ancient thinkers in China put forward that "people are the foundation of the country, the foundation of the country and the foundation of peace" and "between heaven and earth, people are the most precious", emphasizing the need to benefit the people, enrich the people, help the people and benefit the people. People-oriented, which we emphasize today, inherits China's ancient people-oriented thought, but there are essential differences.

2. China's ancient people-oriented thought embodies the simple value orientation of attaching importance to the people, and to a certain extent, it plays a role in easing class contradictions and reducing the burden on the people. The "people" in the people-oriented thought is relative to the "monarch" and the ruler, and its essence is to maintain the ruling position of the feudal ruler. We adhere to the people-oriented principle and put the people's interests first, which embodies the historical position of the people as masters of their own affairs and embodies our party's ruling philosophy of building the party for the public and governing for the people.

3. Humanism is an ideological system, world outlook or ideological weapon formed by the emerging bourgeoisie in the anti-feudal and anti-church struggle during the Renaissance. It advocates all people-oriented, opposes the authority of God, advocates the liberation of personality and pursues the happiness of real life: pursuing freedom and equality, opposing hierarchical concepts, advocating rationality and opposing ignorance.