The important aesthetic standard of Chinese art is to pursue what and what

In art activities, artists express and convey their aesthetic consciousness and ideals through art creation; the public obtains a sense of beauty and satisfies their aesthetic needs through art appreciation. Art, as a special social ideology, influences people's mental outlook and thoughts and feelings through the whole process of artistic activities, and eventually exerts a multifaceted effect and influence on social life. Through the practice of artistic creation, the natural beauty of real life is summarized and refined, and centrally expressed in the beauty of art works. In the history of aesthetics, due to the different philosophical views of aestheticians, the understanding of artistic beauty is not the same. Hegel from the objective idealism, that the art of beauty is all the years in the advanced stage of development of beauty, is the advanced form of beauty; he advocates the art of beauty is higher than the natural beauty, claiming that the art of beauty is the real beauty, it is "the regeneration of the beauty of the mind, the mind and its products than the natural and how much it is higher than the phenomenon, the art of beauty than the natural beauty of the high number of ". Chernyshevsky, on the other hand, criticizes Hegel from the standpoint of metaphysical materialism, arguing for the supremacy of natural beauty over artistic beauty, arguing that "beauty in objective reality is thoroughly beautiful." "Art creates less than what is beautiful in reality" Art is just a pale and inaccurate reflection of life. Marxist aesthetics believes that the beauty of art is the main object of aesthetics research, art can not be separated from the image, and thus the beauty of art is mainly the beauty of the artistic image, it is the same as the artistic image is also derived from real life, the same as the image of real life has the same vividness and richness and other characteristics, but it is different from the same with the image of art is different from the real life, it is the crystallization of the artistic creation of the aesthetic activities of mankind is a typical generalization of real life, therefore, the real-life image is not a typical generalization, so it is the same as the artistic image. It is the crystallization of human aesthetic activities created by art and the typical generalization of real life, so the beauty in real life is more concentrated and typical. Like other major problems in aesthetics, the classification of beauty is a problem that has not been normatively solved in the history of aesthetics. Common in our aesthetics textbooks is the classification according to the nature of the aesthetic object itself, such as natural beauty, social beauty, artistic beauty, formal beauty and so on. The biggest defect of this classification is that it turns the classification of "beauty" into a mechanical categorization of "things of beauty", which does not and cannot reveal the different generative characteristics and laws of beauty itself, and thus does not help to understand, analyze and grasp the objective beauty. This is related to the mechanical understanding of the nature of beauty in traditional aesthetics. From the point of view of systematic aesthetics, beauty cannot exist independently from the system of aesthetic relations1, and beauty is only the systematic quality of the object in the aesthetic relations. In reality, without the specific aesthetic correspondence and aesthetic subject, without the specific aesthetic distance and aesthetic environment, the object will not be beautiful or not beautiful; beauty is never the natural or social function quality inherent in the object. Therefore, the classification of beauty cannot be separated from the aesthetic system. Of course, if we set the human subject as the aesthetic subject according to the principle of scientific abstraction, and at the same time, the elements of the aesthetic system --