How to understand that there are three kinds of unfilial, none of which is the biggest? Is it unfilial to choose to be a dink?

If Chinese civilization has both civilization and dross, I think this aimless filial piety is the dross in Chinese culture.

Why should filial piety and unfilial be measured by having children? It's good to have children, but now we are not ancient and it's not the time to carry on the family line, so? Pass the incense? This is not right. Therefore, it is really unnecessary to have children and be filial to parents.

It may be more filial not to have children. First of all, I'm not Dink, and I don't have Dink's idea, but I think not having children will give us more time to be filial to our parents. After having children, we will focus on life and have less time to take care of our parents. We are no longer in that superstitious era. People used to believe that children can continue their consciousness, but now we know that a person can only live once. What happened?

So, I don't think it's important to have children. What matters is whether you can spend your life in the way you like. There is only one success in life, and that is to live as one pleases. I don't think there is anything wrong with this idea.

Of course, having children is very meaningful. I suggest that people with dink ideas consider children, because the process of reproduction is sacred. Maybe after being parents, we can find more meaning. Fertility still occupies a large part in the human reproductive process. If everyone is a dink, then we have no descendants. Therefore, if Dink must think about it, he must seriously consider whether he will regret not having children in the future. if